Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 16:42 UTC

felinics / connect-it

Self-hosted connector gateway — hold your SaaS credentials once, and hand your agents a single MCP endpoint.

Go · TypeScriptMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined
#connector#gateway#mcp

felinics/connect-it holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FelinicOrganization
56 followers12 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/sdk/gov0.1.0-153 days ago
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-itv0.3.0-327 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

69Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

49Weak
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 21 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
16/18Commit volume — 60 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year60
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push21
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 3 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 27 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~11.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tagv0.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release27
mean_days_between_releases11.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars11
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 90% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.9

Issue & PR responsiveness

40Weak
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
18/30PR acceptance — 6/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.6/25Owner reach — 56 followers of felinics
9.5/25Track record — 12 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers56
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginfelinics
public_repos12
account_age_days250

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 27 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/felinics/connect-it/sdk/go, github.com/felinics/connect-it
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish27

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsconnector, gateway, mcp
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 59 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.983
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes1,610

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/web/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 17 of the last 60 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.283
toolchain_manifestspackages/api/go.mod, packages/connectors/go.mod, packages/core/go.mod, packages/service/go.mod, sdk/go/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/165 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes47,276
source_files_sampled165
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — packages/api/docs/swagger.json, packages/api/docs/swagger.yaml
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filespackages/api/docs/swagger.json, packages/api/docs/swagger.yaml
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

11GitHub stars
3contributors
60commits, last 12 months
21days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 16:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests6 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities52 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/packages/corev0.0.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/packages/servicev0.0.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/packages/connectorsv0.0.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/labstack/echo/v4v4.15.4packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/echo-swaggerv1.5.2packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/swaggo/swagv1.16.2packages/api/go.mod
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/packages/corev0.0.0packages/connectors/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0packages/connectors/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0packages/core/go.mod
Gogithub.com/felinics/connect-it/packages/corev0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000packages/service/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-migrate/migrate/v4v4.19.1packages/service/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3packages/service/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0packages/service/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0packages/service/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0packages/service/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.45.0packages/service/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0packages/service/go.mod
npm@connect-it/sdkworkspace:*packages/web/package.json
npm@felinic/uiworkspace:*packages/web/package.json
npm@radix-icons/vue^1.0.0packages/web/package.json
npmlucide-vue-next^0.562.0packages/web/package.json
npmvue^3.5.26packages/web/package.json
npmvue-i18n^11.4.7packages/web/package.json
npmvue-router^4.6.0packages/web/package.json
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0sdk/go/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.35.0sdk/go/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with felinics/connect-it. Read them side by side →

99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional94smg-project/smgEngine-agnostic LLM gateway in Rust. Full OpenAI & Anthropic API compatibility across vLLM, TRT-LLM, TokenSpeed, SGLang, OpenAI, Gemini & more. Industry-first gRPC pipeline, KV cache-aware routing, chat history, tokenization caching, Responses API, embeddings, WASM plugins, MCP, and multi-tenant auth.Exceptional98github/github-mcp-serverGitHub's official MCP ServerExceptional98pomerium/pomeriumPomerium is an identity and context-aware access proxy.Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.