Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 23:59 UTC

firebase / firebase-unity-sdk

The Firebase SDK for Unity

C# · PythonApache-2.0★ 319 stars⑂ 59 forkssince Sep 2020View on GitHub ↗

KindMobile applicationhow this is determined

#firbase-database #firebase #firebase-analytics #firebase-auth #firebase-authentication #firebase-cloud-messaging #firebase-firestore #firebase-functions #firebase-remote-config #firebase-storage #firestore #unity

firebase/firebase-unity-sdk holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (73/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FirebaseOrganization

7,236 followers102 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

94Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
30.5/36	Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 118 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	118
human_commit_share	0.9
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	44

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 61 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	61
latest_release_tag	v13.15.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	18
mean_days_between_releases	28.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

65Good

How it's scored

40.6/60	Stars — 319 stars
14.7/25	Forks — 59 forks
9.3/15	Watchers — 48 watchers

Inputs used

forks	59
stars	319
watchers	48
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 31 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	31
top_contributor_share	0.466

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

35.4/42	Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
24.4/30	PR acceptance — 687/845 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

merged_prs	687
open_issues	102
closed_issues	552
prs_merged_7d	7
prs_decided_7d	7
prs_merged_30d	9
prs_decided_30d	9
issue_closed_ratio	0.844
closed_unmerged_prs	158
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 7,236 followers of firebase
25/25	Track record — 102 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	7,236
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	firebase
public_repos	102
account_age_days	5,334

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://firebase.google.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	firbase-database, firebase, firebase-analytics, firebase-auth, firebase-authentication, firebase-cloud-messaging, firebase-firestore, firebase-functions, firebase-remote-config, firebase-storage, firestore, unity
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://firebase.google.com
docs_site	http://firebase.google.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

74Good

How it's scored

6/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
4.5/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
3/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
4.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	7.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	262
unassessed_packages	7
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 262 resolved dependencies against OSV. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 89 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.989
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — scripts/gha/integration_testing/automated_testapp/ftl_testapp_files/Firebase.TestLabManager.csproj, scripts/gha/integration_testing/gameloop_android/app/build.gradle, scripts/gha/integration_testing/gameloop_android/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.07
toolchain_manifests	scripts/gha/integration_testing/automated_testapp/ftl_testapp_files/Firebase.TestLabManager.csproj, scripts/gha/integration_testing/gameloop_android/app/build.gradle, scripts/gha/integration_testing/gameloop_android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 4/421 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	C#
largest_source_bytes	203,337
source_files_sampled	421
oversized_source_files	4

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — sample, samples

Inputs used

example_dirs	sample, samples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

319GitHub stars

31contributors

118commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

61releases

2bus factor

102open issues

—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 59 ⇿

0Stars

59Forks

60Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 5Minor 47Patch 7

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10

7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 23:58 UTC

8	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
6	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9	Code-Review	Found 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
6	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
9	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 269

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 269 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@fastify/busboy	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	@firebase/app-check-interop-types	`0.3.4`	indirect
npm	@firebase/app-types	`0.9.5`	indirect
npm	@firebase/auth-interop-types	`0.2.5`	indirect
npm	@firebase/component	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	@firebase/database	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	@firebase/database-compat	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@firebase/database-types	`1.0.20`	indirect
npm	@firebase/logger	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	@firebase/util	`1.15.1`	indirect
npm	@google-cloud/firestore	`8.7.0`	indirect
npm	@google-cloud/paginator	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	@google-cloud/projectify	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@google-cloud/promisify	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	@google-cloud/storage	`7.21.0`	indirect
npm	@grpc/grpc-js	`1.14.4`	indirect
npm	@grpc/proto-loader	`0.8.1`	indirect
npm	@isaacs/cliui	`8.0.2`	indirect
npm	@js-sdsl/ordered-map	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	@nodable/entities	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@opentelemetry/api	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	@pkgjs/parseargs	`0.11.0`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/aspromise	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/base64	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/codegen	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/eventemitter	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/fetch	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/float	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/path	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/pool	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@protobufjs/utf8	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@tootallnate/once	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	@types/body-parser	`1.19.6`	indirect
npm	@types/caseless	`0.12.5`	indirect
npm	@types/connect	`3.4.38`	indirect
npm	@types/cors	`2.8.19`	indirect
npm	@types/express	`5.0.6`	indirect
npm	@types/express-serve-static-core	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/http-errors	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@types/jsonwebtoken	`9.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/ms	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`26.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/qs	`6.15.1`	indirect
npm	@types/range-parser	`1.2.7`	indirect
npm	@types/request	`2.48.13`	indirect
npm	@types/send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/serve-static	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	@types/tough-cookie	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	abort-controller	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	accepts	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.2.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	anynum	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	arrify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	async-retry	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	base64-js	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	bignumber.js	`9.3.1`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.9`	indirect
npm	buffer-equal-constant-time	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	content-type	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	cors	`2.8.6`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	duplexify	`4.1.3`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	ecdsa-sig-formatter	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	end-of-stream	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	event-target-shim	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	express	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-xml-builder	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-xml-parser	`5.10.1`	indirect
npm	faye-websocket	`0.11.4`	indirect
npm	fetch-blob	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	firebase-admin	`14.2.0`	indirect
npm	firebase-functions	`7.3.2`	indirect
npm	foreground-child	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	form-data	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	formdata-polyfill	`4.0.10`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	functional-red-black-tree	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	gaxios	`6.7.1`	indirect
npm	gaxios	`7.3.0`	indirect
npm	gcp-metadata	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	gcp-metadata	`8.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	google-auth-library	`10.5.0`	indirect
npm	google-auth-library	`10.9.1`	indirect
npm	google-auth-library	`9.15.1`	indirect
npm	google-gax	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	google-logging-utils	`0.0.2`	indirect
npm	google-logging-utils	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	gtoken	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	gtoken	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	html-entities	`2.6.0`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	http-parser-js	`0.5.10`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.3`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-promise	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-stream	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-unsafe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jackspeak	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	jose	`6.2.5`	indirect
npm	json-bigint	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonwebtoken	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	jwa	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	jwks-rsa	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	jws	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	limiter	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	lodash.camelcase	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.includes	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isboolean	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isinteger	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	lodash.isnumber	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isplainobject	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	lodash.isstring	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.once	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	long	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`10.4.3`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.5.2`	indirect
npm	lru-memoizer	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.54.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.9`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	node-domexception	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	node-fetch	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	node-fetch	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-hash	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	package-json-from-dist	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-expression-matcher	`1.6.2`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	proto3-json-serializer	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	protobufjs	`7.6.5`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.15.3`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`3.6.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	retry	`0.13.1`	indirect
npm	retry-request	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	retry-request	`8.0.4`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`5.0.10`	indirect
npm	router	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.8.5`	indirect
npm	send	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	stream-events	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	stream-shift	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	strnum	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	stubs	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	teeny-request	`10.1.4`	indirect
npm	teeny-request	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	tr46	`0.0.3`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	type-is	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	uuid	`11.1.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	web-streams-polyfill	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	websocket-driver	`0.7.5`	indirect
npm	websocket-extensions	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xml-naming	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.3`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	absl-py	`—`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`—`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pygithub	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 262 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 7 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records