Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-23 16:53 UTC

firebend / jobba

A durable job scheduling platform for dotnet

C#MIT★ 10 stars⑂ 2 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

firebend/jobba holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (64/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FirebendOrganization · verified domain
4 followers8 public repossince Jun 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18Commit volume11 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year11
human_commit_share0.46
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases13 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~49.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv12.0.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases49.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars10 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars10
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54.6/80Total downloads180,337 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesJobba.Core, Jobba.Cron, Jobba.MassTransit, Jobba.Redis, Jobba.Store.EF.Sql, Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads180,337
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 76% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth6 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.761
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
16.2/30PR acceptance112/207 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs112
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs95
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach4 followers of firebend
18.9/25Track record8 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginfirebend
public_repos8
account_age_days2,643

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable6 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history52 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesJobba.Core, Jobba.Cron, Jobba.MassTransit, Jobba.Redis, Jobba.Store.EF.Sql, Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.2/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages34
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 34 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history45 of 46 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.978
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapJobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj, Jobba.Cron/Jobba.Cron.csproj, Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance41 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsJobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj, Jobba.Cron/Jobba.Cron.csproj, Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj, Jobba.MassTransit/Jobba.MassTransit.csproj, Jobba.Redis/Jobba.Redis.csproj, Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj, Jobba.Store.EF.Sql/Jobba.Store.EF.Sql.csproj, Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite/Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite.csproj, Jobba.Store.EF/Jobba.Store.EF.csproj, Jobba.Store.Mongo/Jobba.Store.Mongo.csproj, Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj, Jobba.Web.Sample/Jobba.Web.Sample.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.41
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/257 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes13,217
source_files_sampled257
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

10GitHub stars
6contributors
11commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212022-112022-122023-02
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-23 16:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5CI-Tests8 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 55
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAsyncKeyedLock8.1.2Jobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions9.0.9Jobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions9.0.9Jobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions9.0.9Jobba.Core/Jobba.Core.csproj
NuGetCronos0.11.1Jobba.Cron/Jobba.Cron.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions8.7.1Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetFlurl.Http.Newtonsoft0.9.1Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLogger2.4.1Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.11.0Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.11.0Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4Jobba.IntegrationTests/Jobba.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMassTransit8.5.3Jobba.MassTransit/Jobba.MassTransit.csproj
NuGetLitRedis.Core5.0.0Jobba.Redis/Jobba.Redis.csproj
NuGetMassTransit.RabbitMQ8.5.3Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMassTransit.Newtonsoft8.5.3Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.9Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer9.0.9Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting9.0.9Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions9.0.9Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Hosting9.0.0Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Settings.Configuration9.0.0Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0Jobba.Sample/Jobba.Sample.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sql/Jobba.Store.EF.Sql.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sql/Jobba.Store.EF.Sql.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sql/Jobba.Store.EF.Sql.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sql/Jobba.Store.EF.Sql.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite/Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite/Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite/Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite/Jobba.Store.EF.Sqlite.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF/Jobba.Store.EF.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF/Jobba.Store.EF.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational9.0.9Jobba.Store.EF/Jobba.Store.EF.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4Jobba.Store.EF/Jobba.Store.EF.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions9.0.9Jobba.Store.Mongo/Jobba.Store.Mongo.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.5.0Jobba.Store.Mongo/Jobba.Store.Mongo.csproj
NuGetAutoFixture.AutoMoq4.18.1Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions8.7.1Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLogger2.4.1Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting9.0.9Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.9Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging9.0.9Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.11.0Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.11.0Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetNeleus.LambdaCompare1.0.3Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.TypeConverter4.3.0Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational9.0.9Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite9.0.9Jobba.Tests/Jobba.Tests.csproj
NuGetMassTransit.RabbitMQ8.5.3Jobba.Web.Sample/Jobba.Web.Sample.csproj
NuGetMassTransit.Newtonsoft8.5.3Jobba.Web.Sample/Jobba.Web.Sample.csproj
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore9.0.6Jobba.Web.Sample/Jobba.Web.Sample.csproj
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAsyncKeyedLock8.1.2direct
NuGetAutoFixture.AutoMoq4.18.1direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetCronos0.11.1direct
NuGetFluentAssertions8.7.1direct
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2direct
NuGetFlurl.Http.Newtonsoft0.9.1direct
NuGetGitHubActionsTestLogger2.4.1direct
NuGetLitRedis.Core5.0.0direct
NuGetMassTransit8.5.3direct
NuGetMassTransit.Newtonsoft8.5.3direct
NuGetMassTransit.RabbitMQ8.5.3direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions9.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0direct
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.5.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.11.0direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.11.0direct
NuGetNeleus.LambdaCompare1.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Hosting9.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Settings.Configuration9.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0direct
NuGetSwashbuckle.AspNetCore9.0.6direct
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.TypeConverter4.3.0direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 34 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.