Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-25 05:23 UTC

fireblocks / fireblocks-sdk-js

Typescript & Javascript SDK for developers using Fireblocks API

TypeScriptMIT★ 84 stars⑂ 72 forkssince Sep 2019View on GitHub ↗

#sdk #nodejs #typescript #javascript #fireblocks #blockchain #crypto

fireblocks/fireblocks-sdk-js holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 8 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FireblocksOrganization

223 followers71 public repossince Jul 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	fireblocks-sdk	5.39.1	175,140	142	5 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

48Weak

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 5 days ago
2.8/36	Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18	Commit volume — 8 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	8
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	5
active_weeks_last_year	4

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 92 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~75.2 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	92
latest_release_tag	v5.39.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	5
mean_days_between_releases	75.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate

How it's scored

31.1/60	Stars — 84 stars
15.4/25	Forks — 72 forks
7/15	Watchers — 19 watchers

Inputs used

forks	72
stars	84
watchers	19
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

87Excellent

How it's scored

69.9/80	Monthly downloads — 175,140 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	fireblocks-sdk
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	175,140

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

98Exceptional

How it's scored

54/54	Bus factor — 8 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
20.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 10% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 63 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	8
contributors_sampled	63
top_contributor_share	0.1

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate

How it's scored

21.5/42	Issue resolution — 51% of issues closed
23.8/30	PR acceptance — 206/260 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	206
open_issues	23
closed_issues	24
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.511
closed_unmerged_prs	54
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

72Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.9/25	Owner reach — 223 followers of fireblocks
25/25	Track record — 71 public repos, account ~8 yr old

Inputs used

followers	223
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	fireblocks
public_repos	71
account_age_days	2,939

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20	Version history — 142 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	fireblocks-sdk
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

34At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.fireblocks.com/api/swagger-ui/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	sdk, nodejs, typescript, javascript, fireblocks, blockchain, crypto
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.fireblocks.com/api/swagger-ui/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

48Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 14/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
1/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

49Weak

How it's scored

14/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: uuid 8.3.2 (high 7.5)
8.8/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: uuid 9.0.1 (high 7.5), @stablelib/ed25519 1.0.3 (moderate 5.3)
26.5/40	No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 114 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	3
affected_packages	3
assessed_packages	97
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Matched the npm:fireblocks-sdk@5.39.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 97 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40	Legible commit history — 45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.45
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

22At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

92Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
46.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 2/13 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	105,004
source_files_sampled	13
oversized_source_files	2

Key facts

84GitHub stars

63contributors

8commits, last 12 months

5days since last push

92releases

8bus factor

23open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 72 ⇿

0Stars

72Forks

89Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 52Patch 33

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-25 05:23 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
5	CI-Tests	7 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 14/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
2	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	21 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@notabene/pii-sdk	`^1.17.1`	package.json
npm	axios	`^1.16.0`	package.json
npm	jsonwebtoken	`^9.0.2`	package.json
npm	platform	`^1.3.6`	package.json
npm	qs	`^6.11.0`	package.json
npm	query-string	`^7.1.3`	package.json
npm	uuid	`^8.3.2`	package.json

All dependencies 141

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 133 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@notabene/pii-sdk	`1.17.1`	direct
npm	axios	`1.18.1`	direct
npm	jsonwebtoken	`9.0.2`	direct
npm	platform	`1.3.6`	direct
npm	qs	`6.11.1`	direct
npm	query-string	`7.1.3`	direct
npm	uuid	`8.3.2`	direct
npm	uuid	`9.0.0`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.21.4`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.19.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/highlight	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@ethersproject/bytes	`5.7.0`	indirect
npm	@ethersproject/logger	`5.7.0`	indirect
npm	@multiformats/base-x	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@noble/ciphers	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@noble/curves	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@noble/hashes	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	@scure/base	`1.1.9`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/binary	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/ed25519	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/hash	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/int	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/random	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/sha512	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@stablelib/wipe	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@types/jsonwebtoken	`9.0.2`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`16.18.28`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`20.1.2`	indirect
npm	@types/platform	`1.3.4`	indirect
npm	@types/qs	`6.9.7`	indirect
npm	@types/uuid	`8.3.4`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`1.0.10`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	axios-oauth-client	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	axios-token-interceptor	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	base-x	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	base64url	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	bs58	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	buffer-equal-constant-time	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	builtin-modules	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	canonicalize	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	commander	`2.20.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	decode-uri-component	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	did-jwt	`7.4.7`	indirect
npm	did-resolver	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	diff	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`16.0.3`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ecdsa-sig-formatter	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	fetch-blob	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	filter-obj	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	formdata-polyfill	`4.0.10`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.12.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`3.14.1`	indirect
npm	jwa	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	jws	`3.2.2`	indirect
npm	lock	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash.includes	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isboolean	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isinteger	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	lodash.isnumber	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash.isplainobject	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	lodash.isstring	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.once	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	multibase	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	multicodec	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	multiformats	`9.9.0`	indirect
npm	node-domexception	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	node-fetch	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.12.3`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.5.4`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	split-on-first	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	sprintf-js	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	strict-uri-encode	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	tslint	`6.1.3`	indirect
npm	tsutils	`2.29.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	uint8arrays	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	varint	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	web-streams-polyfill	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 3

Installing npm:fireblocks-sdk@5.39.1 pulls in 97 packages, direct and transitive: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
uuid	`8.3.2`	direct	high	1	`13.0.1`
uuid	`9.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`13.0.1`
@stablelib/ed25519	`1.0.3`	indirect	moderate	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records