Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 01:40 UTC

fleetbase / core-api

Fleetbase API Core

PHPAGPL-3.0★ 13 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

fleetbase/core-api holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FleetbaseOrganization
242 followers64 public repossince Apr 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistfleetbase/core-api1.6.606,9391688 days agofleetbaselogistics-platform

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 783 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year783
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.6.60
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases8.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
17.5/60Stars — 13 stars
13/25Forks — 37 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks37
stars13
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.2/80Monthly downloads — 6,939 downloads/month across packagist
8.4/20Registry dependents — 17 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesfleetbase/core-api
dependents17
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads48,340
monthly_downloads6,939
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.945
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 234/246 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs234
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.2/25Owner reach — 242 followers of fleetbase
25/25Track record — 64 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers242
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginfleetbase
public_repos64
account_age_days3,078

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 168 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfleetbase/core-api
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages3
unassessed_packages46
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.6/40Legible commit history — 63 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.63
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 33 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.33
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 5/759 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes97,292
source_files_sampled759
oversized_source_files5

Key facts

13GitHub stars
7contributors
783commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿
0Stars
37Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383712023-082025-022026-09
Major 0Minor 2Patch 98

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 01:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php-laravel^3.7composer.json
Packagistfleetbase/countries^0.8.3composer.json
Packagistfleetbase/laravel-mysql-spatial^1.0.2composer.json
Packagistfleetbase/twilio^5.0.1composer.json
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-php^8.13composer.json
Packagistgoogle/apiclient^2.18composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.4composer.json
Packagisthammerstone/fast-paginate^1.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/broadcasting^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/database^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/http^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/notifications^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/routing^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/support^9.0|^10.0composer.json
Packagistinkrot/php-compress-json^0.1.1composer.json
Packagistinnoge/laravel-msgraph-mail^1.4composer.json
Packagistintervention/image^3.11composer.json
Packagistjdorn/sql-formatter^1.2composer.json
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/apn^5.0composer.json
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/fcm^4.1composer.json
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/twilio^3.3composer.json
Packagistlaravel/sanctum3.2.4composer.json
Packagistlcobucci/clock3.3.1composer.json
Packagistlcobucci/jwt^5.4composer.json
Packagistmaatwebsite/excel^3.1composer.json
Packagistphrity/websocket^1.7composer.json
Packagistsentry/sentry-laravel*composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-activitylog^4.7composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-google-cloud-storage^2.2composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-permission^6.3composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-responsecache^7.5composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-schedule-monitor^3.7composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-sluggable^3.5composer.json
Packagistsqids/sqids^0.4.1composer.json
Packagistxantios/mimey^2.2.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-pdf^1.9composer.json
Packagistmossadal/math-parser^1.3composer.json
Packagistrlanvin/php-rrule^2.4composer.json
All dependencies 49

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 39 direct and 10 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistaws/aws-sdk-php-laravel—direct
Packagistfleetbase/countries—direct
Packagistfleetbase/laravel-mysql-spatial—direct
Packagistfleetbase/twilio—direct
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-php—direct
Packagistgoogle/apiclient—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagisthammerstone/fast-paginate—direct
Packagistilluminate/broadcasting—direct
Packagistilluminate/contracts—direct
Packagistilluminate/database—direct
Packagistilluminate/http—direct
Packagistilluminate/notifications—direct
Packagistilluminate/routing—direct
Packagistilluminate/support—direct
Packagistinkrot/php-compress-json—direct
Packagistinnoge/laravel-msgraph-mail—direct
Packagistintervention/image—direct
Packagistjdorn/sql-formatter—direct
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/apn—direct
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/fcm—direct
Packagistlaravel-notification-channels/twilio—direct
Packagistlaravel/sanctum3.2.4direct
Packagistlcobucci/clock3.3.1direct
Packagistlcobucci/jwt—direct
Packagistmaatwebsite/excel—direct
Packagistmossadal/math-parser—direct
Packagistphrity/websocket—direct
Packagistrlanvin/php-rrule—direct
Packagistsentry/sentry-laravel—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-activitylog—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-google-cloud-storage—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-pdf—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-permission—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-responsecache—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-schedule-monitor—direct
Packagistspatie/laravel-sluggable—direct
Packagistsqids/sqids—direct
Packagistxantios/mimey—direct
Packagistcknow/laravel-money—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer3.82.2indirect
Packagistilluminate/translation—indirect
Packagistilluminate/validation—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpoffice/phpspreadsheet—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 46 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.