Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 12:07 UTC

fluentassertions / fluentassertions.autofac

Fluent Assertions extensions for Autofac

C#Apache-2.0★ 23 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Dec 2015View on GitHub ↗

fluentassertions/fluentassertions.autofac holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Security (71/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FluentAssertionsOrganization
98 followers9 public repossince Feb 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetFluentAssertions.Autofac6.5.2-190 days agoautofacfluent-assertionsioctdddotnet-core

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence2/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume2 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained14 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases3 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,665 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count3
latest_release_tag6.5.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,665
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.8/60Stars23 stars
7/25Forks8 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars23
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.1/80Total downloads611,288 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesFluentAssertions.Autofac
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads611,288
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.948
How it's scored
40.4/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance10/12 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs10
open_issues1
closed_issues26
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.963
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
14.3/25Owner reach98 followers of fluentassertions
19.3/25Track record9 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers98
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginfluentassertions
public_repos9
account_age_days3,497

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history19 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesFluentAssertions.Autofac
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsautofac, fluent-assertions, ioc, tdd, dotnet-core
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained14 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 9 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
12.3/40Legible commit history23 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.23
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapFluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj, FluentAssertions.Autofac/FluentAssertions.Autofac.csproj, SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsFluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj, FluentAssertions.Autofac/FluentAssertions.Autofac.csproj, SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/38 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes13,709
source_files_sampled38
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

23GitHub stars
6contributors
2commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
3releases
1bus factor
1open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468812016-032018-122021-09

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 12:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained14 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAutofac7.1.0FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions8.10.0FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetNSubstitute5.3.0FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetXunitXml.TestLogger3.0.70FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests/FluentAssertions.Autofac.Tests.csproj
NuGetAutofac7.1.0FluentAssertions.Autofac/FluentAssertions.Autofac.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions8.10.0FluentAssertions.Autofac/FluentAssertions.Autofac.csproj
NuGetGitVersion.MsBuild6.8.2FluentAssertions.Autofac/FluentAssertions.Autofac.csproj
NuGetAutofac7.1.0SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions8.10.0SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetNSubstitute5.3.0SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
NuGetXunitXml.TestLogger3.0.70SampleLib/SampleLib.csproj
All dependencies 9

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAutofac7.1.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetFluentAssertions8.10.0direct
NuGetGitVersion.MsBuild6.8.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0direct
NuGetNSubstitute5.3.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2direct
NuGetXunitXml.TestLogger3.0.70direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 9 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.