Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 07:41 UTC

flytohub / flyto-core

AI said it finished. Flyto2 shows the proof.

PythonApache-2.0★ 480 stars⑂ 83 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolPluginLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined

flytohub/flyto-core holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (55/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Flyto2Organization
43 followers17 public repossince Nov 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 581 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year581
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year40
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 27 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_tagv2.28.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release27
mean_days_between_releases20

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43.5/60Stars — 480 stars
16/25Forks — 83 forks
9.4/15Watchers — 51 watchers
Inputs used
forks83
stars480
watchers51
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
49.7/80Monthly downloads — 5,294 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesflyto-core
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,294
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.987
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
17.5/30PR acceptance — 42/72 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs42
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d14
prs_decided_30d14
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs30
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of flytohub
10.7/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginflytohub
public_repos17
account_age_days285

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 229 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesflyto-core
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://flyto2.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, browser-automation, mcp-server, workflow-engine, flyto2, evidence, replay
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://flyto2.com
docs_sitehttps://flyto2.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages21
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:flyto-core@2.31.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 21 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://flyto2.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 94 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://flyto2.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.94
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,329
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
11/11Static type checking — src/core/modules/atomic/testing/visual_worker/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/core/modules/atomic/testing/visual_worker/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/core/modules/atomic/testing/visual_worker/tsconfig.json)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/1,141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes98,231
source_files_sampled1,141
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, recipes
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

480GitHub stars
4contributors
581commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
13releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'flyto-plugin-example' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 83 ⇿
0Stars
83Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008342026-022026-052026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 8
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 07:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIflyto-core>=2.17.0plugin-template/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.3,<7pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp>=3.14.3,<4pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.15.0,<5pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml>=6.1.1,<7pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.13.4,<3pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.2.2,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles>=23.2.1,<25pyproject.toml
PyPIregex>=2024.4.16,<2027pyproject.toml
All dependencies 181

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiofiles—direct
PyPIaiohttp—direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup4—direct
PyPIflyto-core—direct
PyPIlxml—direct
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIregex—direct
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color5.1.11indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector7.1.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/generational-cache1.0.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/nwsapi2.3.9indirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/compat-data7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/core7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/generator7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-compilation-targets7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-globals7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-option7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/template7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@codemod/matchers1.7.1indirect
npm@codemod/parser1.4.1indirect
npm@codemod/utils1.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.2.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.1.9indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.6indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@types/node26.1.2indirect
npm@types/pngjs6.0.5indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.3indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.7indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001806indirect
npmcommander14.0.3indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.396indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.2indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmisolated-vm6.1.2indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsdom29.1.1indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmlru-cache5.1.1indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.51indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpixelmatch7.2.0indirect
npmpngjs7.0.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtldts7.4.9indirect
npmtldts-core7.4.9indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.2indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmtsx4.23.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici7.29.0indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebcrack2.16.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
npmyallist3.1.1indirect
PyPI-—indirect
PyPIasyncpg—indirect
PyPIblack—indirect
PyPIbuild—indirect
PyPIcryptography—indirect
PyPIdnspython—indirect
PyPIfastapi—indirect
PyPIhttpx—indirect
PyPIhttpx2—indirect
PyPIjsbeautifier—indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPIopenai—indirect
PyPIpillow—indirect
PyPIpip-audit—indirect
PyPIpip-tools—indirect
PyPIplaywright—indirect
PyPIpyjwt—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpython-telegram-bot—indirect
PyPIqdrant-client—indirect
PyPIqrcode—indirect
PyPIrequests—indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers—indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIstarlette—indirect
PyPItree-sitter—indirect
PyPItree-sitter-javascript—indirect
PyPItwine—indirect
PyPIuvicorn—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:flyto-core@2.31.2 pulls in 21 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.