Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 00:16 UTC

folbricht / routedns

DNS stub resolver, proxy and router with support for DoT, DoH, DoQ, and DTLS

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 633 stars⑂ 80 forkssince Jun 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

folbricht/routedns holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (59/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Frank OlbrichtPersonal account
59 followers27 public repossince Feb 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/folbricht/routednsv1.0.2-1875 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 292 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year292
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases5.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.4/60Stars — 633 stars
15.8/25Forks — 80 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks80
stars633
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, pkg.go.dev, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 73% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.732
How it's scored
39.6/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
28.8/30PR acceptance — 391/408 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs391
open_issues14
closed_issues236
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d15
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.944
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.8/25Owner reach — 59 followers of folbricht
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers59
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginfolbricht
public_repos27
account_age_days5,001
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 187 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/folbricht/routedns
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgo, golang, dns-over-tls, dns-over-https, dns, pipelining, dns-privacy, doh, dot, dns-server, dns-client, dns-over-quic, doq, dns-over-dtls
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages36
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 36 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
38.2/40Legible commit history — 71 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.717
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes809
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/203 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes46,620
source_files_sampled203
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

633GitHub stars
21contributors
292commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
14open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 80 ⇿
0Stars
80Forks
98Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060808022019-072023-022026-09
Major 1Minor 0Patch 97

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 00:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 27 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 19
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/0xERR0R/expiration-cachev0.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/RackSec/srslogv0.0.0-20180709174129-a4725f04ec91go.mod
Gogithub.com/cisco/go-hpkev0.0.0-20230407100446-246075f83609go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/odoh-gov1.0.1-0.20230926114050-f39fa019b017go.mod
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/folbricht/gluav1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/heimdalr/dagv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/jtacoma/uritemplatesv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.73go.mod
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/pion/dtls/v3v3.1.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.64.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.23.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/txthinking/socks5v0.0.0-20260601051520-339b044ab0ebgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.61.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.49.0go.mod
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 17 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/0xerr0r/expiration-cachev0.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/cisco/go-hpkev0.0.0-20230407100446-246075f83609direct
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/odoh-gov1.0.1-0.20230926114050-f39fa019b017direct
Gogithub.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22v22.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/folbricht/gluav1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/heimdalr/dagv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/jtacoma/uritemplatesv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/miekg/dnsv1.1.73direct
Gogithub.com/oschwald/maxminddb-golangv1.13.1direct
Gogithub.com/pion/dtls/v3v3.1.14direct
Gogithub.com/quic-go/quic-gov0.64.0direct
Gogithub.com/racksec/srslogv0.0.0-20180709174129-a4725f04ec91direct
Gogithub.com/redis/go-redis/v9v9.23.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.12.1direct
Gogithub.com/txthinking/socks5v0.0.0-20260601051520-339b044ab0ebdirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.61.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.49.0direct
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cisco/go-tls-syntaxv0.0.0-20200617162716-46b0cfb76b9bindirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/pion/loggingv0.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/pion/transport/v5v5.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/quic-go/qpackv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/txthinking/runnergroupv0.0.0-20250224021307-5864ffeb65aeindirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.12.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.5indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.58.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.43.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 36 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.58.0indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.