Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-23 01:42 UTC

fomantic / gulp-concat-css

Concatenates css files, bubbling up import statements (as per the standard), and optionally rebasing urls and inlining local import statements.

JavaScript · CSSMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2022forkView on GitHub ↗

fomantic/gulp-concat-css holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (59/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (22/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FomanticOrganization
37 followers27 public repossince Jul 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@fomantic/gulp-concat-css5.0.029,34955 days agogulppluginconcatcssimportmergeinline

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume2 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases5 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~338.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tag5.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases338.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

28At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
59.6/80Monthly downloads29,349 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@fomantic/gulp-concat-css
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads29,349
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 76% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.764
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.4/25Owner reach37 followers of fomantic
22.5/25Track record27 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginfomantic
public_repos27
account_age_days2,913
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history5 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@fomantic/gulp-concat-css
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

22At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

10Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages139
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 139 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
19.9/40Legible commit history22 of 59 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.373
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 59
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/2 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes4,646
source_files_sampled2
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
6contributors
2commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • deps.dev does not index npm:@fomantic/gulp-concat-css@5.0.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-23 01:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmlodash.defaults^4.2.0package.json
npmparse-import^2.0.0package.json
npmplugin-error^2.0.1package.json
npm@fomantic/rework^3.0.0package.json
npm@fomantic/rework-import^4.1.0package.json
npmrework-plugin-url^1.1.0package.json
npmthrough2^4.0.2package.json
npmvinyl^3.0.0package.json
All dependencies 139

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 131 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@fomantic/rework3.0.0direct
npm@fomantic/rework-import4.1.0direct
npmlodash.defaults4.2.0direct
npmparse-import2.0.0direct
npmplugin-error2.0.1direct
npmrework-plugin-url1.1.0direct
npmthrough24.0.2direct
npmvinyl3.0.0direct
npm@adobe/css-tools4.4.2indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npmansi-colors1.1.0indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.1.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmansi-wrap0.1.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-uniq1.0.3indirect
npmassertion-error1.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.1.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.3.0indirect
npmchai4.5.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error1.0.3indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmclone2.1.2indirect
npmclone-stats1.0.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdeep-eql4.1.4indirect
npmdiff8.0.4indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfast-fifo1.1.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfastq1.13.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-func-name2.0.2indirect
npmget-imports1.0.0indirect
npmglob10.5.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmimport-regex1.1.0indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.3indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmloupe2.3.7indirect
npmlru-cache10.4.3indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmmocha11.1.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnormalize-path2.1.1indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpathval1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmqueue-tick1.0.1indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmremove-trailing-separator1.1.0indirect
npmreplace-ext2.0.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrework-plugin-function1.0.2indirect
npmrework-visit1.0.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.7indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstreamx2.12.5indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstring-width-cjs4.2.3indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi-cjs6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmteex1.0.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtype-detect4.1.0indirect
npmunixify1.0.0indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool6.5.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi-cjs7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 139 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.