Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 22:48 UTC

franzose / ClosureTable

Adjacency List’ed Closure Table database design pattern implementation for the Laravel framework.

PHPMIT★ 462 stars⑂ 106 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

franzose/ClosureTable holds a health index of 44 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (62/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (30/100). It was last updated 223 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

44
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

44
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Yan IvanovPersonal account
91 followers27 public repossince Apr 2011

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistfranzose/closure-tablev6.2.234,64030225 days agodatabasecategorieslaravelpageshierarchyclosure-tableadjacency-list

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

34At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 223 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume — 15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push223
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 225 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~347.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv6.2.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release225
mean_days_between_releases347.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/60Stars — 462 stars
16.8/25Forks — 106 forks
8/15Watchers — 28 watchers
Inputs used
forks106
stars462
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesposer.pugx.org, shields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
60.5/80Monthly downloads — 34,640 downloads/month across packagist
4/20Registry dependents — 3 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesfranzose/closure-table
dependents3
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,270,441
monthly_downloads34,640
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.874
How it's scored
38.1/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 132/144 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs132
open_issues13
closed_issues126
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.906
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.1/25Owner reach — 91 followers of franzose
22.5/25Track record — 27 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers91
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginfranzose
public_repos27
account_age_days5,642
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 225 days ago
20/20Version history — 30 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfranzose/closure-table
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish225

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, php, database, hierarchical-data, tree, closure-table
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate1.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories23
affected_packages9
assessed_packages70
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 4, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 70 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40Legible commit history — 28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.28
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/50 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes49,838
source_files_sampled50
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

462GitHub stars
16contributors
15commits, last 12 months
223days since last push
31releases
1bus factor
13open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 106 ⇿
0Stars
106Forks
31Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010422013-052019-092026-02
Major 0Minor 1Patch 19

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10
1.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 22:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 70

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 70 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/inflector1.3.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.3.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer1.2.0indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator2.1.17indirect
Packagisterusev/parsedown1.7.4indirect
Packagistfzaninotto/faker1.9.1indirect
Packagistkylekatarnls/update-helper1.2.1indirect
Packagistlaravel/framework5.5.48indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem1.0.66indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog1.25.3indirect
Packagistmtdowling/cron-expression1.2.3indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.9.5indirect
Packagistnesbot/carbon1.39.1indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench3.5.5indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench-core3.5.11indirect
Packagistparagonie/random_compat9.99.99indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest1.0.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/version1.0.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.1.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.1.0indirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.10.3indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage5.3.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator1.4.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer1.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream2.0.2indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit6.5.14indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit-mock-objects5.0.10indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.3indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache1.0.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid3.9.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator2.1.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff2.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment3.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter3.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator3.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector1.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context3.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistswiftmailer/swiftmailer6.2.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/console3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector5.0.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/debug3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher4.4.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts1.1.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php561.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php701.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php721.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-util1.15.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/routing3.4.39indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation4.3.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts1.1.7indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper3.4.39indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.1.3indirect
Packagisttijsverkoyen/css-to-inline-styles2.2.2indirect
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv2.6.2indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.7.0indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 70 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
laravel/framework5.5.48indirectcritical1213.12.0
league/flysystem1.0.66indirectcritical12.1.1
nesbot/carbon1.39.1indirecthigh13.8.4
phpunit/phpunit6.5.14indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/http-foundation3.4.39indirecthigh27.3.7
symfony/process3.4.39indirecthigh28.0.5
swiftmailer/swiftmailer6.2.3indirectmoderate16.2.5
symfony/http-kernel3.4.39indirectmoderate16.2.6
symfony/routing3.4.39indirectmoderate28.0.13

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.