Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:40 UTC

fugue-project / triad

A collection of python utility functions

PythonApache-2.0★ 11 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

fugue-project/triad holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (39/100). It was last updated 111 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Fugue ProjectOrganization
62 followers15 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPItriad1.0.22,222,19998197 days agofugueutilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

39Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

19Critical
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 111 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
7/18Commit volume — 5 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year5
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push111
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

70Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 94 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 197 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~91.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count94
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release197
mean_days_between_releases91.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

23At Risk
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars11
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, codecov.io, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 2,222,199 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestriad
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,222,199
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.963

Issue & PR responsiveness

95Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29/30PR acceptance — 119/123 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 26/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs119
open_issues0
closed_issues14
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.9/25Owner reach — 62 followers of fugue-project
20.8/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers62
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginfugue-project
public_repos15
account_age_days2,299

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 197 days ago
20/20Version history — 98 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestriad
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish197

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

76Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 26/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages6
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:triad@1.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 6 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — triad/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstriad/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (triad/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/52 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes43,216
source_files_sampled52
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

11GitHub stars
4contributors
5commits, last 12 months
111days since last push
94releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2024-07-12: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 11 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 11 ★ / 5 ⇿
11Stars
5Forks
56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2024-07-12. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

02468101211512020-102022-082024-07
Major 0Minor 5Patch 41

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10
3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 20:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests5 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 26/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities56 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2pyproject.toml
PyPIsix—pyproject.toml
PyPIpyarrow>=6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIfsspec>=2022.5.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 172

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 163 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIfsspec2025.10.0direct
PyPIfsspec2026.1.0direct
PyPInumpy2.0.2direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.4.1direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpyarrow21.0.0direct
PyPIpyarrow23.0.0direct
PyPIsix1.17.0direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings25.1.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.0.5indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.1.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIbleach6.2.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.3.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIciso86012.3.3indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.2indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.19indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.19.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.15indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.16indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel6.31.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.1.0indirect
PyPIipython8.18.1indirect
PyPIipython8.38.0indirect
PyPIipython9.9.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjson50.13.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.8.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.8.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.17.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.5.3indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImistune3.2.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.2indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.4indirect
PyPInbconvert7.16.6indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.3.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.24.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.1indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.0.0indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.27.1indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.14indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.10.2indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIsphinx7.4.7indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints2.3.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.4.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.4indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.4.0indirect
PyPIwebcolors24.11.1indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:triad@1.0.2 pulls in 6 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with fugue-project/triad. Read them side by side →

93ARM-software/golang-utilsHelpers and utilities for Golang in order to do actions not available in the standard library.Exceptional92tqdm/tqdm:zap: A Fast, Extensible Progress Bar for Python and CLIExcellent89Lightning-AI/utilitiesCommon Python utilities and GitHub Actions in Lightning EcosystemExcellent86mahmoud/boltons🔩 Like builtins, but boltons. 250+ constructs, recipes, and snippets which extend (and rely on nothing but) the Python standard library. Nothing like Michael Bolton.Excellent86SuperCowPowers/workbenchWorkbench: An easy to use Python API for creating and deploying AWS SageMaker ModelsExcellent81airbytehq/fastmcp-extensionsUnofficial FastMCP extensions, created by Airbyte for the FastMCP and Airbyte community. Used by our own MCP servers and inspired by our usage patterns and emerging best practices.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.