Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 10:54 UTC

futrime / lip

A general package installer

C#GPL-3.0★ 72 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Jan 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

futrime/lip holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (49/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Zijian ZhangPersonal account
0 followers32 public repossince Jan 2018College of AI, Tsinghua University | NVIDIA Research

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@futrime/lip0.34.81,999844 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume321 commits in the last year
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
commits_last_year321
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases80 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 44 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~16.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count80
latest_release_tagv0.34.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release44
mean_days_between_releases16.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30/60Stars72 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars72
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
44/80Monthly downloads1,999 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@futrime/lip
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,999
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 86% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.862
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
19.8/30PR acceptance171/259 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs171
open_issues1
closed_issues82
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs88
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach0 followers of futrime
23.1/25Track record32 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginfutrime
public_repos32
account_age_days3,157
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history8 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@futrime/lip
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://lip.levimc.org/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslevilamina, lip, package-manager
has_wikino
homepagehttps://lip.levimc.org/
docs_sitehttps://lip.levimc.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
4.5/7.5Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.8

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages5
assessed_packages211
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 211 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history89 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.989
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,302
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/Golang.Org.X.Mod/Golang.Org.X.Mod.csproj, src/Lip.Cli/Lip.Cli.csproj, src/Lip.Core/Lip.Core.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance10 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Golang.Org.X.Mod/Golang.Org.X.Mod.csproj, src/Lip.Cli/Lip.Cli.csproj, src/Lip.Core/Lip.Core.csproj, src/Lip.Daemon/Lip.Daemon.csproj, tests/Golang.Org.X.Mod.Tests/Golang.Org.X.Mod.Tests.csproj, tests/Lip.Core.RegressionTests/Lip.Core.RegressionTests.csproj, tests/Lip.Core.Tests/Lip.Core.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.1
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/137 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes14,833
source_files_sampled137
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

72GitHub stars
9contributors
321commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
80releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 10 ⇿
0Stars
10Forks
51Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468101022023-042024-122026-07
Major 0Minor 19Patch 29

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 10:54 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
6Maintained8 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 6
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 211

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 211 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.28.5indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.2indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.0indirect
npm@docsearch/css4.6.0indirect
npm@docsearch/js4.6.0indirect
npm@docsearch/sidepanel-js4.6.0indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.4indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.4indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.75indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-rc.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.0indirect
npm@shikijs/core3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.5indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api8.1.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit8.1.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared8.1.1indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.30indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.30indirect
npm@vueuse/core14.2.1indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations14.2.1indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata14.2.1indirect
npm@vueuse/shared14.2.1indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.27.4indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfocus-trap8.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmoniguruma-parser0.12.1indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es4.3.5indirect
npmperfect-debounce2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpostcss8.5.12indirect
npmproperty-information7.1.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrollup4.60.0indirect
npmshiki3.23.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite7.3.2indirect
npmvitepress2.0.0-alpha.17indirect
npmvue3.5.30indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
NuGetCastle.Core5.1.1indirect
NuGetCliWrap3.10.4indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetDotNet.Glob3.1.3indirect
NuGetDownloader5.9.5indirect
NuGetFlurl4.0.0indirect
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2indirect
NuGetMessagePack2.5.302indirect
NuGetMessagePack.Annotations2.5.302indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.23.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x6410.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces6.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeCoverage18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Primitives5.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.StringTools18.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-x6410.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.Telemetry1.9.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport.Abstractions1.9.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform1.9.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild1.9.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.TestHost18.8.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Threading.Only17.14.15indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Validation17.13.22indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Registry5.0.0indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetNerdbank.MessagePack1.2.4indirect
NuGetNerdbank.Streams2.13.16indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetPolyType1.3.1indirect
NuGetScriban7.2.6indirect
NuGetSemver3.0.0indirect
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.3indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console0.57.2indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console.Ansi0.57.2indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cli0.55.0indirect
NuGetSpectre.Console.Json0.57.2indirect
NuGetStreamJsonRpc2.25.29indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.EventLog6.0.0indirect
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.TestingHelpers22.2.0indirect
NuGetTestableIO.System.IO.Abstractions.Wrappers22.2.0indirect
NuGetTestably.Abstractions.FileSystem.Interface10.3.0indirect
NuGetxunit.analyzers1.27.0indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
NuGetxunit.v33.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.assert3.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.common3.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.core.mtp-v13.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.extensibility.core3.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v13.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.runner.common3.2.2indirect
NuGetxunit.v3.runner.inproc.console3.2.2indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 211 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Microsoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-x6410.0.10indirecthigh310.0.11
nanoid3.3.11indirecthigh35.1.16
postcss8.5.12indirecthigh28.5.23
vite7.3.2indirecthigh28.0.16
esbuild0.27.4indirectlow10.28.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.