Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 14:08 UTC

gahojin / middy-middlewares

Middy ミドルウェア群

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2024View on GitHub ↗

gahojin/middy-middlewares holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

株式会社GAHOJINOrganization · verified domain
1 follower16 public repossince Apr 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@gahojin-inc/middy-appsync2026.8.04185515 days agomiddyappsynclambdaaws
npm@gahojin-inc/middy-http-signature2026.8.04065015 days agomiddyhttp-signaturelambdaaws
npm@gahojin-inc/middy-http-body-parser2026.8.03442915 days agomiddylambdaaws
npm@gahojin-inc/middy-valibot-validator2026.8.03985915 days agomiddyvalibotlambdaaws
npm@gahojin-inc/middy-dynamodb-partial-batch-failure2026.8.04155815 days agomiddydynamodblambdaaws

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 512 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year512
human_commit_share0.81
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year49

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 60 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 29 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count60
latest_release_tagv2026.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases16.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44/80Monthly downloads — 1,981 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@gahojin-inc/middy-appsync, @gahojin-inc/middy-http-signature, @gahojin-inc/middy-http-body-parser, @gahojin-inc/middy-valibot-validator, @gahojin-inc/middy-dynamodb-partial-batch-failure
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,981
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.5/30PR acceptance — 457/464 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs457
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of gahojin
15.8/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingahojin
public_repos16
account_age_days1,252

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 59 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@gahojin-inc/middy-appsync, @gahojin-inc/middy-http-signature, @gahojin-inc/middy-http-body-parser, @gahojin-inc/middy-valibot-validator, @gahojin-inc/middy-dynamodb-partial-batch-failure
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmiddy
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages178
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 178 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 80 of 81 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.988
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — packages/middy-appsync/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-dynamodb-partial-batch-failure/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-http-body-parser/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-http-signature/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-valibot-validator/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 19 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/middy-appsync/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-dynamodb-partial-batch-failure/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-http-body-parser/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-http-signature/tsconfig.json, packages/middy-valibot-validator/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.19
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes13,508
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
512commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
60releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 14:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@biomejs/biomecatalog:package.json
npm@fast-check/vitestcatalog:package.json
npm@types/nodecatalog:package.json
npm@vitest/coverage-v8catalog:package.json
npmrolldowncatalog:package.json
npmrolldown-plugin-dtscatalog:package.json
npmturbocatalog:package.json
npmtypescriptcatalog:package.json
npmvitestcatalog:package.json
All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 169 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.11direct
npm@fast-check/vitest0.4.1direct
npm@types/node26.4.1direct
npm@vitest/coverage-v84.1.11direct
npmrolldown1.2.6direct
npmrolldown-plugin-dts0.28.4direct
npmturbo2.10.12direct
npmtypescript7.0.2direct
npmvitest4.1.11direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.11indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.11indirect
npm@gahojin-inc/aws-lambda-mock-context2026.8.0indirect
npm@gahojin-inc/aws-lambda-mock-contextcatalog:indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@middy/core7.7.2indirect
npm@middy/corecatalog:indirect
npm@middy/util7.7.2indirect
npm@middy/utilcatalog:indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.147.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.6indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@serverless/event-mocks1.1.1indirect
npm@serverless/event-mockscatalog:indirect
npm@standard-schema/spec1.1.0indirect
npm@turbo/darwin-642.10.12indirect
npm@turbo/darwin-arm642.10.12indirect
npm@turbo/linux-642.10.12indirect
npm@turbo/linux-arm642.10.12indirect
npm@turbo/windows-642.10.12indirect
npm@turbo/windows-arm642.10.12indirect
npm@types/aws-lambda8.10.163indirect
npm@types/aws-lambdacatalog:indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/lodash4.17.24indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@valibot/i18n1.2.0indirect
npm@valibot/i18ncatalog:indirect
npm@vitest/expect4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/mocker4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/runner4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/spy4.1.11indirect
npm@vitest/utils4.1.11indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-android-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-darwin-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-freebsd-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-linux-x64-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-codegen/binding-win32-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-android-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-darwin-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-freebsd-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl0.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-arm640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-parser/binding-win32-x640.9.4indirect
npm@yuku-toolchain/types0.9.4indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.5indirect
npmchai6.2.2indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdts-resolver3.0.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfast-check4.9.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig5.0.0-beta.6indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmagicast0.5.4indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmobug2.1.4indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.23indirect
npmpure-rand8.4.2indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env4.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.1.1indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmvalibot1.4.2indirect
npmvalibotcatalog:indirect
npmvite8.1.5indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmyuku-ast0.9.4indirect
npmyuku-codegen0.9.4indirect
npmyuku-parser0.9.4indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 178 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
valibotcatalog:indirectmoderate11.4.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.