Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 08:23 UTC

galtzo-floss / gem_bench

🪑 Benchmark different versions of same or similar gems & Static Gemfile and installed gem library source code analysis

RubyCustom license★ 94 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Apr 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#benchmark#benchmarking#bundler#rubygem#rubygems

galtzo-floss/gem_bench holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100). It was last updated 23 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Galtzo Open SourceOrganization
5 followers60 public repossince May 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsgem_benchpoints to another repo — not scored2.0.5-19717 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

55Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

57Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 23 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
15/18Commit volume — 46 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year46
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push23
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 717 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv2.0.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release717
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak
How it's scored
31.9/60Stars — 94 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars94
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

29At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.961

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
14.7/30PR acceptance — 23/47 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs23
open_issues1
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of galtzo-floss
15.6/25Track record — 60 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingaltzo-floss
public_repos60
account_age_days471

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 33 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://railsbling.com/gem_bench
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbenchmark, benchmarking, bundler, rubygem, rubygems
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://railsbling.com/gem_bench
docs_sitehttp://railsbling.com/gem_bench
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages158
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 158 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

48Weak
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
3.3/40Legible commit history — 6 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.061
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,571

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

78Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes16,182
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

94GitHub stars
7contributors
46commits, last 12 months
23days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
1open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • rubygems package 'gem_bench' points at a different repository (http://github.com/pboling/gem_bench/tree/v2.0.5); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512013-122017-052020-10

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 08:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemskettle-family~> 1.2Gemfile
RubyGemsnomono~> 1.1Gemfile
RubyGemsirb~> 1.17Gemfile
All dependencies 178

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsirb1.18.0direct
RubyGemskettle-family1.2.54direct
RubyGemsnomono1.1.4direct
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader—indirect
RubyGemsanonymous_loader0.1.3indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2—indirect
RubyGemsappraisal23.2.2indirect
RubyGemsappraisal2-rubocop1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsast-crispr7.1.3indirect
RubyGemsast-crispr-markdown-markly7.1.3indirect
RubyGemsast-merge7.1.3indirect
RubyGemsbackports3.25.3indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal4.1.2indirect
RubyGemsbundler—indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit—indirect
RubyGemsbundler-audit0.9.3indirect
RubyGemscgi0.5.2indirect
RubyGemscitrus3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscmdparse3.0.7indirect
RubyGemscolsole1.0.1indirect
RubyGemscommand_kit0.6.0indirect
RubyGemscommand_kit-completion0.3.0indirect
RubyGemscompletely0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdebug1.11.1indirect
RubyGemsdelegate0.6.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsdiffy3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsdocopt_ng0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-configurable1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-core1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-inflector1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsdry-initializer3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-logic1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-schema1.16.0indirect
RubyGemsdry-types1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsemoji_regex15.0.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.7indirect
RubyGemsgeom2d0.4.1indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex—indirect
RubyGemsgitmoji-regex2.0.12indirect
RubyGemshexapdf1.9.1indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.9.2indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemskettle-changelog1.0.2indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev—indirect
RubyGemskettle-dev3.0.6indirect
RubyGemskettle-gha-pins0.3.12indirect
RubyGemskettle-ndjson0.1.12indirect
RubyGemskettle-rb0.1.10indirect
RubyGemskettle-soup-cover3.0.9indirect
RubyGemskettle-test—indirect
RubyGemskettle-test2.0.20indirect
RubyGemskettle-wash0.1.5indirect
RubyGemskramdown2.5.2indirect
RubyGemskramdown-parser-gfm1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmarkdown-merge7.1.3indirect
RubyGemsmarkly0.16.0indirect
RubyGemsmarkly-merge7.1.3indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source—indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmister_bin0.9.0indirect
RubyGemsmutex_m0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.19.4indirect
RubyGemsopenssl4.0.2indirect
RubyGemsostruct0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel_tests5.7.0indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsparslet2.0.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.4indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.4.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake—indirect
RubyGemsrake13.4.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.1.3indirect
RubyGemsrdoc7.2.0indirect
RubyGemsreek6.5.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.7.0indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench—indirect
RubyGemsrequire_bench1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrspec—indirect
RubyGemsrspec3.13.2indirect
RubyGemsrspec-block_is_expected—indirect
RubyGemsrspec-block_is_expected1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.13.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.13.5indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.13.8indirect
RubyGemsrspec-pending_for0.1.26indirect
RubyGemsrspec-stubbed_env1.0.13indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.13.7indirect
RubyGemsrspec_junit_formatter0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.88.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-capybara2.23.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-env0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-factory_bot2.28.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-gradual0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts10.3.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-lts-rspec1.0.5indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-md2.0.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-minitest0.40.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-on-rbs2.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-packaging—indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-packaging0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-performance1.26.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec3.10.2indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec-extra0.3.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rspec_rails2.32.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ruby2_33.0.6indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-thread_safety0.7.3indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar—indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby_engine2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsruby_version1.0.3indirect
RubyGemsservice_actor3.9.4indirect
RubyGemssilent_stream1.0.12indirect
RubyGemssimplecov1.1.1indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-cobertura4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-console0.9.5indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-rcov0.3.7indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_lcov_formatter0.9.0indirect
RubyGemssorbet-runtime0.6.13426indirect
RubyGemsstandard—indirect
RubyGemsstandard1.56.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-custom1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsstandard-performance1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rspec0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsstandard-rubocop-lts2.0.10indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums—indirect
RubyGemsstone_checksums1.0.8indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrings-ansi0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsstrscan3.1.8indirect
RubyGemsterminal-table4.0.0indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstimecop0.9.11indirect
RubyGemstimecop-rspec1.0.3indirect
RubyGemstoken-resolver2.0.9indirect
RubyGemstree_haver7.1.3indirect
RubyGemstree_sitter_language_pack1.14.3indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstty-cursor0.7.1indirect
RubyGemstty-progressbar0.18.3indirect
RubyGemstty-screen0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests2—indirect
RubyGemsturbo_tests23.2.5indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem—indirect
RubyGemsversion_gem1.1.15indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsyaml-converter0.2.5indirect
RubyGemsyard—indirect
RubyGemsyard0.9.45indirect
RubyGemsyard-fence0.9.8indirect
RubyGemsyard-junk0.1.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-lint1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-relative_markdown_links0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsyard-timekeeper0.2.6indirect
RubyGemsyard-yaml0.2.5indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.8.3indirect
RubyGemszlib3.2.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 158 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with galtzo-floss/gem_bench. Read them side by side →

89karafka/waterdropStandalone Karafka library for producing Kafka messagesExcellent73appraisal-rb/appraisal2🔍️ A Ruby library for testing your library against different versions of dependencies managed by bundler or OREGood94dotnet/BenchmarkDotNetPowerful .NET library for benchmarkingExceptional88CodSpeedHQ/codspeed-rustCrates to benchmark your Rust codeExcellent86ionelmc/pytest-benchmarkpytest fixture for benchmarking codeExcellent84Sahil170595/ChimeraforgePyPI capacity-planning CLI for LLM deployment. pip install chimeraforge.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.