Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:25 UTC

galtzo-floss / rspec-pending_for

⏳️Mark specs pending or skipped for specific Ruby engine (e.g. MRI or JRuby) / version combinations | ranges

Ruby · ShellCustom license★ 12 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Oct 2015View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#rspec #spec-pending #ruby #rubygem #test-automation

galtzo-floss/rspec-pending_for holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (52/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Galtzo Open SourceOrganization

5 followers60 public repossince May 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
RubyGems	rspec-pending_for	0.1.27	-	26	22 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 22 days ago
7.6/36	Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 131 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	131
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	22
active_weeks_last_year	11

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~48.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	10
latest_release_tag	v0.1.27
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	22
mean_days_between_releases	48.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

17Critical

How it's scored

16.9/60	Stars — 12 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	12
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

79Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	8
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good

How it's scored

56/80	Total downloads — 246,495 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	rspec-pending_for
dependents	—
ecosystems	rubygems
total_downloads	246,495
monthly_downloads	—
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

25At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.992

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
8.9/30	PR acceptance — 24/81 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	24
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	57
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

51Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
5.6/25	Owner reach — 5 followers of galtzo-floss
15.6/25	Track record — 60 public repos, account ~1 yr old

Inputs used

followers	5
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	galtzo-floss
public_repos	60
account_age_days	468

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20	Version history — 26 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	rspec-pending_for
ecosystems	rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 33 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://railsbling.com/tags/rspec-pending_for
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	rspec, spec-pending, ruby, rubygem, test-automation
has_wiki	yes
homepage	http://railsbling.com/tags/rspec-pending_for
docs_site	http://railsbling.com/tags/rspec-pending_for
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	156
unassessed_packages	14
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 156 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

46Weak

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
1.1/40	Legible commit history — 2 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.02
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	10,571

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Gemfile.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	mise.toml
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
51.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/17 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	93,868
source_files_sampled	17
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

12GitHub stars

4contributors

131commits, last 12 months

22days since last push

10releases

1bus factor

0open issues

RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10

6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:24 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 3

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
RubyGems	kettle-family	`~> 1.2`	Gemfile
RubyGems	nomono	`~> 1.1`	Gemfile
RubyGems	irb	`~> 1.17`	Gemfile

All dependencies 170

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 167 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
RubyGems	irb	`1.18.0`	direct
RubyGems	kettle-family	`1.2.54`	direct
RubyGems	nomono	`1.1.4`	direct
RubyGems	addressable	`2.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	anonymous_loader	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	anonymous_loader	`0.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ansi	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2	`3.2.2`	indirect
RubyGems	appraisal2-rubocop	`1.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	ast	`2.4.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ast-crispr	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ast-crispr-markdown-markly	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ast-merge	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	backports	`3.25.3`	indirect
RubyGems	benchmark	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	bigdecimal	`4.1.2`	indirect
RubyGems	bundler-audit	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	bundler-audit	`0.9.3`	indirect
RubyGems	cgi	`0.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	citrus	`3.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	cmdparse	`3.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	colsole	`1.0.1`	indirect
RubyGems	command_kit	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	command_kit-completion	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	completely	`0.8.0`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`1.3.8`	indirect
RubyGems	date	`3.5.1`	indirect
RubyGems	debug	`1.11.1`	indirect
RubyGems	delegate	`0.6.1`	indirect
RubyGems	diff-lcs	`1.6.2`	indirect
RubyGems	diffy	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	docopt_ng	`0.7.1`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-configurable	`1.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-core	`1.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-inflector	`1.3.1`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-initializer	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-logic	`1.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-schema	`1.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	dry-types	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	emoji_regex	`15.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	erb	`6.0.7`	indirect
RubyGems	gem_bench	`2.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	geom2d	`0.4.1`	indirect
RubyGems	gitmoji-regex	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	gitmoji-regex	`2.0.12`	indirect
RubyGems	hexapdf	`1.9.1`	indirect
RubyGems	io-console	`0.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	json	`2.21.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-changelog	`1.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-dev	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-dev	`3.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-gha-pins	`0.3.12`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-ndjson	`0.1.12`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-rb	`0.1.10`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-soup-cover	`3.0.9`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-test	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-test	`2.0.20`	indirect
RubyGems	kettle-wash	`0.1.5`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown	`2.5.2`	indirect
RubyGems	kramdown-parser-gfm	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	language_server-protocol	`3.17.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	lint_roller	`1.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`1.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	markdown-merge	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	markly	`0.16.0`	indirect
RubyGems	markly-merge	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	mister_bin	`0.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	mutex_m	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	nokogiri	`1.19.4`	indirect
RubyGems	openssl	`4.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	ostruct	`0.6.3`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel	`1.28.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel_tests	`5.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parser	`3.3.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	parslet	`2.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	pp	`0.6.4`	indirect
RubyGems	prettyprint	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	prism	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	psych	`5.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	public_suffix	`7.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	racc	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rainbow	`3.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`13.4.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rbs	`4.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	rdoc	`7.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reek	`6.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	regexp_parser	`2.12.0`	indirect
RubyGems	reline	`0.7.0`	indirect
RubyGems	require_bench	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	require_bench	`1.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rexml	`3.4.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec	`3.13.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-block_is_expected	`1.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`3.13.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-expectations	`3.13.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-mocks	`3.13.8`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-stubbed_env	`1.0.13`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-support	`3.13.7`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec_junit_formatter	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop	`1.88.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-ast	`1.50.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-capybara	`2.23.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-env	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-factory_bot	`2.28.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-gradual	`0.4.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-lts	`0.3.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-lts-rspec	`1.0.5`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-md	`2.0.4`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-minitest	`0.40.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-on-rbs	`2.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-performance	`1.26.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rake	`0.7.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec	`3.10.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec-extra	`0.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec_rails	`2.32.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-ruby1_8	`2.0.6`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-thread_safety	`0.7.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`1.13.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_engine	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_engine	`2.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_version	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby_version	`1.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	service_actor	`3.9.4`	indirect
RubyGems	silent_stream	`1.0.12`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov	`1.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-cobertura	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-console	`0.9.5`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov-rcov	`0.3.7`	indirect
RubyGems	simplecov_lcov_formatter	`0.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	sorbet-runtime	`0.6.13426`	indirect
RubyGems	standard	`1.56.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-custom	`1.0.2`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-performance	`1.9.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-rspec	`0.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	standard-rubocop-lts	`2.0.10`	indirect
RubyGems	stone_checksums	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	stone_checksums	`1.0.8`	indirect
RubyGems	stringio	`3.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	strings-ansi	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	strscan	`3.1.8`	indirect
RubyGems	terminal-table	`4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	thor	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	timecop	`0.9.11`	indirect
RubyGems	timecop-rspec	`1.0.3`	indirect
RubyGems	token-resolver	`2.0.9`	indirect
RubyGems	tree_haver	`7.1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	tree_sitter_language_pack	`1.14.3`	indirect
RubyGems	tsort	`0.2.0`	indirect
RubyGems	tty-cursor	`0.7.1`	indirect
RubyGems	tty-progressbar	`0.18.3`	indirect
RubyGems	tty-screen	`0.8.2`	indirect
RubyGems	turbo_tests2	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	turbo_tests2	`3.2.6`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`2.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	version_gem	`1.1.15`	indirect
RubyGems	webrick	`1.9.2`	indirect
RubyGems	yaml-converter	`0.2.5`	indirect
RubyGems	yard	`0.9.45`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-fence	`0.9.8`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-junk	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-lint	`1.11.0`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-relative_markdown_links	`0.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-timekeeper	`0.2.6`	indirect
RubyGems	yard-yaml	`0.2.5`	indirect
RubyGems	zeitwerk	`2.8.3`	indirect
RubyGems	zlib	`3.2.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 156 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records