Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 08:03 UTC

geoql / doctor

Your agent writes bad Vue/Nuxt. This catches it. — A pair of CLIs and oxlint plugins that audit Vue 3 + Nuxt 4 apps for performance, correctness, security, and AI-agent anti-patterns.

TypeScriptMIT★ 7 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryEditor extensionhow this is determined

geoql/doctor holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GeoQLOrganization · verified domain
18 followers13 public repossince Nov 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 328 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year328
human_commit_share0.26
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagvue-doctor-v1.7.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars7
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges13
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.1/80Monthly downloads — 13,518 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@geoql/vue-doctor, @geoql/doctor-core, @geoql/nuxt-doctor, @geoql/doctor-rule-core, @geoql/doctor-language-server, @geoql/eslint-plugin-vue-doctor, @geoql/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctor, @geoql/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads13,518
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
41.4/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance — 127/159 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs127
open_issues1
closed_issues68
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.986
closed_unmerged_prs32
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
9.2/25Owner reach — 18 followers of geoql
19.9/25Track record — 13 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers18
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingeoql
public_repos13
account_age_days2,117

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 45 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@geoql/vue-doctor, @geoql/doctor-core, @geoql/nuxt-doctor, @geoql/doctor-rule-core, @geoql/doctor-language-server, @geoql/eslint-plugin-vue-doctor, @geoql/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctor, @geoql/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish45

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://the-doctor.report/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsnuxt, vue, nuxt-doctor, vue-doctor
has_wikino
homepagehttps://the-doctor.report/
docs_sitehttps://the-doctor.report/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — no data
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Code-Review, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@geoql/vue-doctor@1.7.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 96 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

85Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .agents/skills/nuxt-agent-ready-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-geo-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-seo-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/vue-best-practices/AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://the-doctor.report/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 26 of 26 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://the-doctor.report/llms.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.agents/skills/nuxt-agent-ready-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-geo-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/nuxt-seo-best-practices/AGENTS.md, .agents/skills/vue-best-practices/AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes117,137
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — apps/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-core/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-language-server/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-rule-core/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin-vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tests/fixtures/build-quality/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tests/fixtures/clean/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/oxlint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/vue-doctor/tests/fixtures/build-quality/tsconfig.json, packages/vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 74 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/docs/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-core/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-language-server/tsconfig.json, packages/doctor-rule-core/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/eslint-plugin-vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tests/fixtures/build-quality/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tests/fixtures/clean/tsconfig.json, packages/nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/oxlint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/vscode-doctor/tsconfig.json, packages/vue-doctor/tests/fixtures/build-quality/tsconfig.json, packages/vue-doctor/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.74
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/516 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes51,926
source_files_sampled516
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7GitHub stars
1contributors
328commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 08:03 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 30 changesets
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@geoql/oxlint-plugin-nuxt-doctorworkspace:*packages/doctor-core/package.json
npm@geoql/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctorworkspace:^packages/doctor-core/package.json
npm@vue/compiler-sfc^3.5.41packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmc12^4.0.0-beta.5packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmkolorist^1.8.0packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmoxc-parser^0.144.0packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmoxlint^1.79.0packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmpicocolors^1.1.1packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmsemver^7.8.5packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmtinyglobby^0.2.17packages/doctor-core/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3packages/doctor-core/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-coreworkspace:^packages/doctor-language-server/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver^10.1.0packages/doctor-language-server/package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-textdocument^1.0.12packages/doctor-language-server/package.json
npmvscode-uri^3.1.0packages/doctor-language-server/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-rule-coreworkspace:*packages/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/eslint-plugin-vue-doctorworkspace:^packages/eslint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-rule-coreworkspace:*packages/eslint-plugin-vue-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-coreworkspace:^packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/oxlint-plugin-nuxt-doctorworkspace:*packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctorworkspace:*packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npmcac^7.0.0packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npmkolorist^1.8.0packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npmoxlint^1.79.0packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npmprompts^2.4.2packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npmshadscan-vue^0.3.2packages/nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-rule-coreworkspace:*packages/oxlint-plugin-nuxt-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-rule-coreworkspace:*packages/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-language-serverworkspace:^packages/vscode-doctor/package.json
npmvscode-languageclient^10.1.0packages/vscode-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/doctor-coreworkspace:^packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npm@geoql/oxlint-plugin-vue-doctorworkspace:*packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npmcac^7.0.0packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npmkolorist^1.8.0packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npmoxlint^1.79.0packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npmprompts^2.4.2packages/vue-doctor/package.json
npmshadscan-vue^0.3.2packages/vue-doctor/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@geoql/vue-doctor@1.7.1 pulls in 96 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.