Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 13:08 UTC

getAlby / nostr-wallet-connect-next

Nostr Wallet Connect (NIP-47) application to allow apps to connect to your node

TypeScript · GoApache-2.0★ 7 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Feb 2024archivedforkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfaceDesktop applicationhow this is determined

getAlby/nostr-wallet-connect-next holds a health index of 14 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (73/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (19/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

14
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

14
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AlbyOrganization
412 followers145 public repossince Sep 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

22At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 745 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push745
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 5 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 810 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv0.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release810
mean_days_between_releases7.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

19Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars7
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled18
top_contributor_share0.457
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 289/384 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs289
open_issues2
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs95
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.8/25Owner reach — 412 followers of getAlby
23/25Track record — 145 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers412
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingetAlby
public_repos145
account_age_days1,829

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://nwc.getalby.com
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://nwc.getalby.com
docs_sitehttps://nwc.getalby.com
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 13/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 126 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://nwc.getalby.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 82 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://nwc.getalby.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.882
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/251 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes54,696
source_files_sampled251
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
18contributors
0commits, last 12 months
745days since last push
5releases
2bus factor
2open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/getAlby/nostr-wallet-connect' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212024-042024-052024-06
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 13:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 13/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities126 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@getalby/bitcoin-connect-react^3.4.1frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-alert-dialog^1.0.5frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-avatar^1.0.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-checkbox^1.0.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.0.5frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu^2.0.6frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-icons^1.3.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-label^2.0.2frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-navigation-menu^1.1.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-progress^1.0.3frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-separator^1.0.3frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.0.2frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-switch^1.0.3frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-toast^1.1.5frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-tooltip^1.0.7frontend/package.json
npm@scure/bip39^1.2.2frontend/package.json
npmargon2-wasm-esm^1.0.3frontend/package.json
npmcanvas-confetti^1.9.2frontend/package.json
npmclass-variance-authority^0.7.0frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.0frontend/package.json
npmdayjs^1.11.10frontend/package.json
npmembla-carousel-react^8.0.2frontend/package.json
npmgradient-avatar^1.0.2frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.363.0frontend/package.json
npmposthog-js^1.116.6frontend/package.json
npmreact^18.2.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.2.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-lottie^1.2.4frontend/package.json
npmreact-qr-code^2.0.12frontend/package.json
npmreact-router-dom^6.21.0frontend/package.json
npmswr^2.2.4frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.2.2frontend/package.json
npmtailwindcss-animate^1.0.7frontend/package.json
npmzustand^4.5.0frontend/package.json
Gogithub.com/adrg/xdgv0.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/breez/breez-sdk-gov0.3.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/davrux/echo-logrus/v4v4.0.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/elnosh/gonutsv0.1.1-0.20240602162005-49da741613e4go.mod
Gogithub.com/getAlby/glalby-gov0.0.0-20240621192717-95673c864d59go.mod
Gogithub.com/getAlby/ldk-node-gov0.0.0-20240624140557-d51c707f10d9go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-gormigrate/gormigrate/v2v2.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/sessionsv1.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/labstack/echo-contribv0.17.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/labstack/echo/v4v4.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nbd-wtf/go-nostrv0.32.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/nbd-wtf/ln-decodepayv1.12.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/orandin/lumberjackrusv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/wailsapp/wails/v2v2.8.2go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.24.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.21.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.64.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/DataDog/dd-trace-go.v1v1.65.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/macaroon.v2v2.1.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.25.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhashv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/glebarez/sqlitev1.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/kelseyhightower/envconfigv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/lightningnetwork/lndv0.17.4-betago.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.3go.mod
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.