Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 23:20 UTC

getporter / docker-mixin

A docker mixin for porter

GoApache-2.0★ 7 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Jul 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

getporter/docker-mixin holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (75/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (52/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PorterOrganization
48 followers48 public repossince Oct 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18Commit volume50 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year50
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 6 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~176.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv1.0.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases176.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars7 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars7
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 27% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth10 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.266
How it's scored
25.7/42Issue resolution61% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance67/73 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs67
open_issues7
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.611
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.2/25Owner reach48 followers of getporter
24.3/25Track record48 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers48
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingetporter
public_repos48
account_age_days2,455
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://getporter.org/mixins/docker
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsporter, docker, mixin
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://getporter.org/mixins/docker
docs_sitehttps://getporter.org/mixins/docker
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages97
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 97 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/30 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes4,606
source_files_sampled30
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

7GitHub stars
10contributors
50commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
15releases
2bus factor
7open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch go package 'get.porter.sh/mixin/docker' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 23:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests18 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Goget.porter.sh/magefilesv0.6.14go.mod
Goget.porter.sh/porterv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yamlv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschemav1.2.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 88 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Goget.porter.sh/magefilesv0.6.14direct
Goget.porter.sh/porterv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/ghodss/yamlv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonschemav1.2.0direct
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/cascadiav1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/carolynvs/aferoxv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cbroglie/mustachev1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cnabio/cnab-gov0.26.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cnabio/cnab-to-ociv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cyberphone/json-canonicalizationv0.0.0-20241213102144-19d51d7fe467indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/distribution/referencev0.6.1-0.20240718132515-8c942b0459dfindirect
Gogithub.com/dustin/go-humanizev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.29.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jeremywohl/flattenv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/magefile/magev1.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semverv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/mikefarah/yq/v3v3.0.0-20201202084205-8846255d1c37indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcdole/gofeedv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcdole/goxppv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulidv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/catv0.0.0-20250911104152-50322a0618f6indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/errorsv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/llv0.1.7indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv1.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/osteele/liquidv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/osteele/tuesdayv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/paesslerag/gvalv1.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/paesslerag/jsonpathv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-tomlv1.9.5indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/puerkitobio/goqueryv1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/qri-io/jsonpointerv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/qri-io/jsonschemav0.2.2-0.20210831022256-780655b2ba0eindirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/uwu-tools/magexv0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonpointerv0.0.0-20190905194746-02993c407bfbindirect
Gogithub.com/xeipuuv/gojsonreferencev0.0.0-20180127040603-bd5ef7bd5415indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.10.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.11.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.28.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.45.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaaindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260526163538-3dc84a4a5aaaindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afindirect
Gogopkg.in/op/go-logging.v1v1.0.0-20160211212156-b2cb9fa56473indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 97 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.