Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 05:43 UTC

getsentry / sentry-elixir

The official Elixir SDK for Sentry (sentry.io)

ElixirMIT★ 691 stars⑂ 216 forkssince Aug 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#tag-production#hacktoberfest#team-web-backend#sdk

getsentry/sentry-elixir holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Security (63/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SentryOrganization
3,111 followers788 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Hexsentry13.3.0411,227999 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 156 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year156
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 86 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~32.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count86
latest_release_tag13.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases32.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

72Good
How it's scored
46/60Stars — 691 stars
19.4/25Forks — 216 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks216
stars691
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

94Exceptional
How it's scored
74.9/80Monthly downloads — 411,227 downloads/month across hex
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessentry
dependents—
ecosystemshex
total_downloads74,897,944
monthly_downloads411,227
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.54

Issue & PR responsiveness

91Excellent
How it's scored
40.5/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
26.3/30PR acceptance — 584/667 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs584
open_issues16
closed_issues431
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.964
closed_unmerged_prs83
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach — 3,111 followers of getsentry
25/25Track record — 788 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,111
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logingetsentry
public_repos788
account_age_days5,279
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 99 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessentry
ecosystemshex
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://sentry.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstag-production, hacktoberfest, team-web-backend, sdk
has_wikino
homepagehttps://sentry.io
docs_sitehttps://sentry.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

63Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,751
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — test_integrations/tracing/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstest_integrations/tracing/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Elixir with type-check config (test_integrations/tracing/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/231 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageElixir
largest_source_bytes55,255
source_files_sampled231
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

691GitHub stars
100contributors
156commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
86releases
1bus factor
16open issues
Hexpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 05:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 25/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 12 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities11 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Hexno_warnplts/dialyzer.pltmix.exs
Hexnimble_options~> 1.0mix.exs
Hexnimble_ownership~> 1.0mix.exs
Hexhackney>= 1.8.0 and < 5.0.0mix.exs
Hexfinch~> 0.21mix.exs
Hexjason~> 1.1mix.exs
Hexphoenix~> 1.6mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 0.20 or ~> 1.0mix.exs
Hexplug—mix.exs
Hextelemetry~> 0.4 or ~> 1.0mix.exs
Hexigniter—mix.exs
Hexrewrite—mix.exs
Hexopentelemetry>= 0.0.0mix.exs
Hexopentelemetry_api>= 0.0.0mix.exs
Hexopentelemetry_exporter>= 0.0.0mix.exs
Hexopentelemetry_semantic_conventions>= 0.0.0mix.exs
Hexshutdown—mix.exs
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@emnapi/core1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.6indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.137.0indirect
npm@playwright/test1.56.1indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.1.2indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@sentry-internal/browser-utils10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry-internal/feedback10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry-internal/replay10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry-internal/replay-canvas10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry/browser10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry/core10.5.0indirect
npm@sentry/svelte10.5.0indirect
npm@sveltejs/acorn-typescript1.0.9indirect
npm@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte7.1.2indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.3indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/node22.19.2indirect
npm@types/trusted-types2.0.7indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmaria-query5.3.1indirect
npmaxobject-query4.1.0indirect
npmclsx2.1.1indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevalue5.8.1indirect
npmesm-env1.2.2indirect
npmesrap2.2.8indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmis-reference3.0.3indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlocate-character3.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmobug2.1.3indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmplaywright1.56.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.56.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmrolldown1.1.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsvelte5.55.7indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmvite8.1.0indirect
npmvitefu1.1.3indirect
npmzimmerframe1.1.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with getsentry/sentry-elixir. Read them side by side →

97getsentry/sentry-pythonThe official Python SDK for Sentry.ioExceptional97getSentry/sentry-goThe official Go SDK for Sentry (sentry.io)Exceptional99getsentry/sentry-javascriptOfficial Sentry SDKs for JavaScriptExceptional97getsentry/sentry-cliA command line utility to work with Sentry.Exceptional98juspay/hyperswitchOpen source, composable payments platform | PCI compliant | SaaS and Self-host options | Enables connectivity to multiple payment, payout, fraud, vault and tokenization providers | Uplifts authorization with intelligent routing and revenue recovery | Reduce payment processing costs with cost observability | Reduces payment ops with reconciliationExceptional98Azure/azure-sdk-for-goThis repository is for active development of the Azure SDK for Go. For consumers of the SDK we recommend visiting our public developer docs at:Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.