Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 18:37 UTC

getsentry / sentry-kafka-schemas

Python · RustCustom license★ 11 stars⑂ 1 forksince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

getsentry/sentry-kafka-schemas holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (51/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SentryOrganization · verified domain
3,188 followers802 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIsentry-kafka-schemas3.0.162,45025022 days ago
crates.iosentry-kafka-schemas3.0.115,24123022 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 22 days ago
20.8/36Commit cadence — 30/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 142 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year142
human_commit_share0.79
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year30
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag3.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases6.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars — 11 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
8.1/15Watchers — 30 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars11
watchers30
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65.2/80Monthly downloads — 77,691 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessentry-kafka-schemas, sentry-kafka-schemas
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads400,946
monthly_downloads77,691
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 62 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled62
top_contributor_share0.347
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 461/489 decided PRs merged
9.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs461
open_issues6
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs28
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 3,188 followers of getsentry
25/25Track record — 802 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers3,188
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingetsentry
public_repos802
account_age_days5,334

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 250 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessentry-kafka-schemas, sentry-kafka-schemas
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://getsentry.github.io/sentry-kafka-schemas/
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstag-production
has_wikino
homepagehttps://getsentry.github.io/sentry-kafka-schemas/
docs_sitehttps://getsentry.github.io/sentry-kafka-schemas/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:sentry-kafka-schemas@3.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 9 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 68 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.861
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — python/mypy.ini, python/sentry_kafka_schemas/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/mypy.ini, python/sentry_kafka_schemas/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (python/mypy.ini, python/sentry_kafka_schemas/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/21 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes11,814
source_files_sampled21
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11GitHub stars
62contributors
142commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
6open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'sentry-kafka-schemas' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 18:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 9/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_yaml0.9Cargo.toml
crates.iojsonschema0.18.1Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2Cargo.toml
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioschemars0.8.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0.11Cargo.toml
crates.iotypify0.0.16Cargo.toml
crates.iosentry_protos>=0.8.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioprost>=0.13, <0.15Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2.5.4Cargo.toml
All dependencies 34

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 22 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iojsonschema—direct
crates.ioprettyplease—direct
crates.ioprost—direct
crates.ioschemars—direct
crates.iosentry_protos—direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.ioserde_yaml—direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iotypify—direct
crates.iourl—direct
npmprettier2.8.6indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema—indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.16.3indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIisort7.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.17.3indirect
PyPIjsonschema-gentypes2.5.0indirect
PyPImsgpack—indirect
PyPImypy1.13.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.2.0indirect
PyPIpython-rapidjson—indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPIsentry-protos—indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIshibuya—indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid—indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf—indirect
PyPItyping-extensions—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:sentry-kafka-schemas@3.0.1 pulls in 9 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.