Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 21:26 UTC

geuthur / aa-ledger

Character & Corporation Ledger PvE Statistics for Alliance Auth

Python · JavaScriptGPL-3.0★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2024View on GitHub ↗

geuthur/aa-ledger holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (44/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GeuthurPersonal account
10 followers20 public repossince May 2011Vienna

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIaa-ledger3.0.21,338793 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume337 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year337
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year38
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases66 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~27 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count66
latest_release_tagv3.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases27

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars4 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
41.7/80Monthly downloads1,338 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesaa-ledger
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,338
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 83% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.832
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
29.8/30PR acceptance274/276 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs274
open_issues1
closed_issues30
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.968
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of Geuthur
21.6/25Track record20 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginGeuthur
public_repos20
account_age_days5,556
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history79 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesaa-ledger
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.flake8, .pylintrc, eslint.config.js, tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://apps.allianceauth.org/apps/detail/aa-ledger
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsallianceauth, ledger, python, eveonline, eve-online
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://apps.allianceauth.org/apps/detail/aa-ledger
docs_sitehttps://apps.allianceauth.org/apps/detail/aa-ledger
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate5.1

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.flake8, .pylintrc, eslint.config.js, tox.ini
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
53.6/55Manageable file sizes4/154 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes496,167
source_files_sampled154
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

4GitHub stars
4contributors
337commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
66releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 21:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests17 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIallianceauth>=5pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-esi>=9pyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-eveonline-sdepyproject.toml
PyPIdjango-ninja>=1.5,<2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 184

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 181 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIallianceauthdirect
PyPIdjango-esidirect
PyPIdjango-ninjadirect
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@cacheable/memory2.0.9indirect
npm@cacheable/utils2.4.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.2.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.6indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/media-query-list-parser5.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/selector-resolve-nested4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/selector-specificity6.0.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.6.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.7indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@keyv/bigmap1.3.1indirect
npm@keyv/serialize1.1.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@sindresorhus/merge-streams4.0.0indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.14.0indirect
npmajv8.18.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmastral-regex2.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.5indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcacheable2.3.5indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolord2.9.3indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcss-functions-list3.3.3indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.4indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.6.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.2indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfastq1.20.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache11.1.3indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflat-cache6.1.22indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobal-modules2.0.0indirect
npmglobal-prefix3.0.0indirect
npmglobals17.7.0indirect
npmglobby16.2.0indirect
npmglobjoin0.1.4indirect
npmhas-flag5.0.1indirect
npmhashery1.5.1indirect
npmhookified1.15.1indirect
npmhookified2.2.0indirect
npmhtml-tags5.1.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimport-meta-resolve4.2.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmkeyv5.6.0indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.truncate4.4.2indirect
npmmathml-tag-names4.0.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmmeow14.1.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpostcss-safe-parser7.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser7.1.4indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqified0.10.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmslash5.1.0indirect
npmslice-ansi4.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstylelint17.14.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-recommended18.0.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard40.0.0indirect
npmsupports-color10.2.2indirect
npmsupports-hyperlinks4.4.0indirect
npmsvg-tags1.0.0indirect
npmtable6.9.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.4.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrite-file-atomic7.0.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.