Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 02:55 UTC

gladiaio / sdk

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

gladiaio/sdk holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (71/100) and lowest on Vitality (45/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GladiaOrganization · verified domain
98 followers20 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@gladiaio/sdk2.0.019,906233 days agogladiasdktypescriptjavascript
PyPIgladiaio-sdk2.0.0278,828123 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

45Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
17.4/18Commit volume — 86 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year86
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
57.3/80Monthly downloads — 19,906 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@gladiaio/sdk
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads19,906
unverified_packages_excludedgladiaio-sdk
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.378
How it's scored
12/42Issue resolution — 29% of issues closed
21.8/30PR acceptance — 32/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs32
open_issues5
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.286
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
14.3/25Owner reach — 98 followers of gladiaio
19.5/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers98
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingladiaio
public_repos20
account_age_days1,795

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 23 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@gladiaio/sdk, gladiaio-sdk
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — e2e/e2e-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), eslint.config.mjs, packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 109 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages35
unassessed_packages36
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 35 resolved dependencies against OSV. 36 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .cursor/rules/nx-rules.mdc
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.cursor/rules/nx-rules.mdc
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,110
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — e2e/e2e-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), eslint.config.mjs, packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — e2e/e2e-node-esm/tsconfig.json, e2e/javascript-fixtures/tsconfig.json, packages/generator/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-js/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-python/src/gladiaio_sdk/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configse2e/e2e-node-esm/tsconfig.json, e2e/javascript-fixtures/tsconfig.json, packages/generator/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-js/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-python/src/gladiaio_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.05
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (e2e/e2e-node-esm/tsconfig.json, e2e/javascript-fixtures/tsconfig.json, packages/generator/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-js/tsconfig.json, packages/sdk-python/src/gladiaio_sdk/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/85 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes42,249
source_files_sampled85
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
7contributors
86commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
0releases
2bus factor
5open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'gladiaio-sdk-e2e-python' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412025-112026-022026-06
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 02:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests21 out of 23 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 22/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities109 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@gladiaio/sdkworkspace:*e2e/e2e-node-cjs/package.json
npm@gladiaio/sdk-e2e-javascript-fixturesworkspace:*e2e/e2e-node-cjs/package.json
npm@gladiaio/sdkworkspace:*e2e/e2e-node-esm/package.json
npm@gladiaio/sdk-e2e-javascript-fixturesworkspace:*e2e/e2e-node-esm/package.json
PyPIgladiaio-sdk—e2e/e2e-python/pyproject.toml
npmcase-anything^3.1.2packages/generator/package.json
npmcommander^14.0.1packages/generator/package.json
npmopenapi3-ts^4.5.0packages/generator/package.json
PyPIdataclasses-json>=0.6.0packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.0packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyee>=13.0.0packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=15.0.0packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml
PyPImarshmallow>=3.26.2packages/sdk-python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 71

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 62 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmcase-anything^3.1.2direct
npmcommander^14.0.1direct
npmopenapi3-ts^4.5.0direct
PyPIdataclasses-json0.6.7direct
PyPIgladiaio-sdk1.0.2direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPImarshmallow3.26.2direct
PyPIpyee13.0.0direct
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1direct
npm@commitlint/cli^20.1.0indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional^20.0.0indirect
npm@commitlint/types^20.0.0indirect
npm@eslint/js^9.37.0indirect
npm@nx/eslint^21.6.3indirect
npm@nx/eslint-plugin^21.6.3indirect
npm@nx/js21.6.3indirect
npm@nx/vite^21.6.3indirect
npm@nx/web21.6.3indirect
npm@nxlv/python^21.2.0indirect
npm@swc-node/register~1.11.1indirect
npm@swc/core~1.13.5indirect
npm@swc/helpers~0.5.17indirect
npm@tsconfig/node20^20.1.6indirect
npm@tsconfig/node22^22.0.2indirect
npm@types/node20.19.9indirect
npm@types/node^20.19.19indirect
npm@types/node^22.18.8indirect
npm@types/ws^8.18.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^8.46.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.46.0indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v8^4.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/ui^4.1.8indirect
npmeslint^9.37.0indirect
npmjiti2.6.1indirect
npmnx^21.6.3indirect
npmprettier^3.6.2indirect
npmtsdown^0.14.2indirect
npmtsdown^0.15.6indirect
npmtslib^2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript~5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint^8.46.0indirect
npmundici^7.22.0indirect
npmvite^7.1.9indirect
npmvitest^4.1.8indirect
npmws^8.19.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIautopep82.3.2indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIgladiaio-sdk-e2e-python0.0.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-sugar1.1.1indirect
PyPIruff0.13.1indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPItermcolor3.1.0indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 35 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 36 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.