Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 21:33 UTC

gluck / il-repack

Open-source alternative to ILMerge

C#Apache-2.0★ 1,353 stars⑂ 226 forkssince Oct 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

gluck/il-repack holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (74/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (24/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Francois ValdyPersonal account
103 followers74 public repossince Feb 2011<div>riots

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetdotnet-ilrepack2.0.46-138 days agoilrepackilmergedotnetildotnet-tooltool

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

55Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence — 4/52 weeks with commits
13/18Commit volume — 27 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year27
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year4

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 26 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~64.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tag2.0.46
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases64.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent
How it's scored
50.8/60Stars — 1,353 stars
19.6/25Forks — 226 forks
9.3/15Watchers — 48 watchers
Inputs used
forks226
stars1,353
watchers48
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

68Good
How it's scored
54.1/80Total downloads — 161,544 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdotnet-ilrepack
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads161,544
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

63Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 34% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 45 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled45
top_contributor_share0.345

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
37.4/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
22/30PR acceptance — 110/150 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs110
open_issues30
closed_issues246
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.891
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.5/25Owner reach — 103 followers of gluck
25/25Track record — 74 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers103
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingluck
public_repos74
account_age_days5,640
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 13 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdotnet-ilrepack
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

60Moderate
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

13Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/128 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes45,914
source_files_sampled128
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,353GitHub stars
45contributors
27commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
26releases
2bus factor
30open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 21:33 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 6/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained25 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetfasterflect3.0.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetFSharp.Core8.0.300ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.70ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.14.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetSourceLink1.1.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Reactive6.0.1ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions8.0.0ILRepack.IntegrationTests/ILRepack.IntegrationTests.csproj
NuGetfasterflect3.0.0ILRepack.Tests/ILRepack.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.70ILRepack.Tests/ILRepack.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0ILRepack.Tests/ILRepack.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.14.0ILRepack.Tests/ILRepack.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0ILRepack.Tests/ILRepack.Tests.csproj
NuGetBamlParser1.0.1ILRepack/ILRepack.csproj
NuGetfasterflect2.1.3ILRepack/ILRepack.csproj
NuGetSourceLink1.1.0ILRepack/ILRepack.csproj
NuGetBamlParser1.0.1ILRepackTool/ILRepackTool.csproj
NuGetfasterflect3.0.0ILRepackTool/ILRepackTool.csproj
NuGetSourceLink1.1.0ILRepackTool/ILRepackTool.csproj
All dependencies 23

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 11 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBamlParser1.0.1direct
NuGetfasterflect2.1.3direct
NuGetfasterflect3.0.0direct
NuGetFSharp.Core8.0.300direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0direct
NuGetMoq4.20.70direct
NuGetNUnit3.14.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0direct
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2direct
NuGetSourceLink1.1.0direct
NuGetSystem.Reactive6.0.1direct
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions8.0.0direct
NuGetDevExpressMvvm17.1.6indirect
NuGetExtended.Wpf.Toolkit2.4.0indirect
NuGetMahApps.Metro1.1.2indirect
NuGetMahApps.Metro.Resources0.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.10.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens7.6.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Immutable6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Windows.Interactivity.WPF2.0.20525indirect
NuGetWPF-UI4.0.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with gluck/il-repack. Read them side by side →

84JerrettDavis/JD.Efcpt.BuildMSBuild/SDK NuGet package that automates database-first EF Core model generation from DACPAC, SQL projects, or live databases. .NET 8+Excellent100dotnet/aspnetcoreASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.Exceptional100AvaloniaUI/AvaloniaDevelop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The future of .NET UIExceptional99App-vNext/PollyPolly is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner. From version 6.0.1, Polly targets .NET Standard 1.1 and 2.0+.Exceptional98unoplatform/unoOpen-source platform for building cross-platform native Mobile, Web, Desktop, and Embedded apps from a single C#/XAML codebase. Work from any IDE/CLI with Hot Reload, Visual Designer, MCPs, and Skills built for modern .NET workflows. 200M+ NuGet downloads.Exceptional98open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet-contribThis repository contains set of components extending functionality of the OpenTelemetry .NET SDK. Instrumentation libraries, exporters, and other components can find their home here.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.