Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-29 14:17 UTC

go4org / go4

go4 hosts the go4.org packages.

GoApache-2.0★ 332 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Nov 2015View on GitHub ↗

go4org/go4 holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (64/100) and lowest on Vitality (6/100). It was last updated 228 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

go4orgOrganization
57 followers10 public repossince May 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

6Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 228 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18Commit volume2 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year2
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push228
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.9/60Stars332 stars
13/25Forks37 forks
7.1/15Watchers20 watchers
Inputs used
forks37
stars332
watchers20
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicestravis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth17 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled17
top_contributor_share0.54
How it's scored
19.4/42Issue resolution46% of issues closed
18.9/30PR acceptance17/27 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues14
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.462
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.7/25Owner reach57 followers of go4org
19.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers57
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingo4org
public_repos10
account_age_days3,391

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://go4.org/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://go4.org/
docs_sitehttps://go4.org/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
15.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: golang.org/x/net v0.48.0 (moderate 6.5), golang.org/x/sys v0.40.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.3/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 113 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories51
affected_packages8
assessed_packages48
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 3, moderate 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 48 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.7/40Legible commit history70 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.707
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/86 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes30,082
source_files_sampled86
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

332GitHub stars
17contributors
2commits, last 12 months
228days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
14open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'go4.org' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿
0Stars
37Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383722015-112021-032026-07

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-29 14:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.56.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/rwcarlsen/goexifv0.0.0-20190401172101-9e8deecbddbdgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.48.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.34.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.40.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.259.0go.mod
All dependencies 48

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 41 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.56.0direct
Gogithub.com/rwcarlsen/goexifv0.0.0-20190401172101-9e8deecbddbddirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.48.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.34.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.40.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.259.0direct
Gocel.dev/exprv0.24.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.121.6indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.18.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iamv1.5.3indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/monitoringv1.24.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cncf/xds/gov0.0.0-20251022180443-0feb69152e9findirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/go-control-plane/envoyv1.35.0indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validatev1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.7indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/detectors/gcpv1.30.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/exporter/metricv0.53.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/internal/resourcemappingv0.53.0indirect
Gogithub.com/planetscale/vtprotobufv0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10indirect
Gogithub.com/spiffe/go-spiffe/v2v2.6.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/gcpv1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.61.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.61.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.38.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.19.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.32.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.14.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20251202230838-ff82c1b0f217indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20251202230838-ff82c1b0f217indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20251222181119-0a764e51fe1bindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.78.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 48 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.46.0indirectcritical280.55.0
google.golang.org/grpcv1.78.0indirectcritical41.82.1
github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.3indirecthigh24.1.4
go.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.38.0indirecthigh21.41.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.38.0indirecthigh41.43.0
golang.org/x/netv0.48.0directmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/sysv0.40.0directunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.32.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.