Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 04:42 UTC

goklab / guardvibe

Security infrastructure your AI can't be — deterministic, daily CVE intel past your model's training cutoff, whole-repo-aware, author-independent, and shift-left: secure_prompt secures the prompt before code generation. The security MCP for vibe coding: 450 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor for Next.js, Supabase, Clerk, Stripe, Prisma, Hono & MCP.

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined
#ai-security#claude#clerk#cursor#mcp#nextjs#owasp#prisma#sast#security#stripe#supabase#typescript#vercel#vibe-coding#cve#drizzle#hono#mcp-server#prompt-injection

goklab/guardvibe holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (80/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (43/100). It was last updated 26 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GOKLABPersonal account
1 follower3 public repossince Aug 2025GokLab

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmguardvibe3.31.01,71920548 days agomcpsecurityvibe-codingowaspvulnerabilityclaudecursorgeminicodexwindsurfai-securitycode-auditnextjssupabasestripeclerkprismadrizzlevercelsastsecret-detectionwebhook-securitycomplianceresendupstashpineconeposthogcloudflareopenaidockerterraformgithub-actionspre-commitsarifcvereact-nativeexpofirebasemcp-serverprompt-injectionsupply-chaintrpchonographqlconvextursolibsqluploadthingoauthcspbolamass-assignmentauto-fix

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

67Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 26 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 288 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year288
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push26
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 48 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.31.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release48
mean_days_between_releases3.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

10Critical
How it's scored
9.8/60Stars — 5 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars5
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

54Moderate
How it's scored
43.1/80Monthly downloads — 1,719 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesguardvibe
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,719
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
3.3/30PR acceptance — 5/45 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

23At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of goklab
6.5/25Track record — 3 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingoklab
public_repos3
account_age_days389
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 48 days ago
20/20Version history — 205 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesguardvibe
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish48

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://guardvibe.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-security, claude, clerk, cursor, mcp, nextjs, owasp, prisma, sast, security, stripe, supabase, typescript, vercel, vibe-coding, cve, drizzle, hono, mcp-server, prompt-injection
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://guardvibe.dev
docs_sitehttps://guardvibe.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:guardvibe@3.31.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 96 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

63Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.1/40Legible commit history — 34 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.34
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,260

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

65Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/238 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes125,596
source_files_sampled238
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5GitHub stars
1contributors
288commits, last 12 months
26days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 04:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained14 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities19 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.26.0package.json
npmtypescript^5.7.0package.json
npmzod^3.25.0package.json
All dependencies 238

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 235 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0direct
npmtypescript5.9.3direct
npmzod3.25.76direct
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.4indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.5.4indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.0indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.4indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.0indirect
npm@hono/node-server1.19.14indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.7indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@istanbuljs/schema0.1.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/istanbul-lib-coverage2.0.6indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node25.5.2indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.58.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.58.0indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.14.0indirect
npmajv8.18.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbody-parser2.2.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.6indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmc811.0.0indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.0.1indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.1indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.2.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.0.6indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.3.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmforeground-child3.3.1indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhono4.12.26indirect
npmhtml-escaper2.0.2indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmistanbul-lib-coverage3.2.2indirect
npmistanbul-lib-report3.0.1indirect
npmistanbul-reports3.2.0indirect
npmjose6.2.2indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlru-cache11.2.7indirect
npmmake-dir4.0.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.0indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqs6.15.2indirect
npmrange-parser1.2.1indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.0indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtest-exclude8.0.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.15indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmtsx4.22.4indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-is2.0.1indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.58.0indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmv8-to-istanbul9.3.0indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:guardvibe@3.31.0 pulls in 96 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with goklab/guardvibe. Read them side by side →

98PostHog/posthog-jsSend usage data from your web app or site to PostHog, with autocapture.Exceptional100clerk/javascriptOfficial JavaScript repository for Clerk authenticationExceptional98CherryHQ/cherry-studioAI productivity studio with smart chat, autonomous agents, and 300+ assistants. Unified access to frontier LLMsExceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99nhost/nhostThe Open Source Firebase Alternative with GraphQL.Exceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.