Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 14:09 UTC

goldenm-software / layrz-sdk

Multi-language SDK for the Layrz IoT platform: shared data models, enums and utilities across Dart, Python and Go, plus the Layrz Compute Language interpreter and a GraphQL API connector.

Dart · Python · GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#dart#flutter#go#iot#layrz#models#python#sdk#telemetry#layrz-sdk

goldenm-software/layrz-sdk holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Golden M & LayrzOrganization · verified domain
11 followers34 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/goldenm-software/layrz-sdk/go/v4v4.4.6-433 days ago—
PyPIlayrz-sdk4.4.6-2233 days agosdkgoldenmlcllayrz-compute-languagelayrz

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 230 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year230
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year31

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 45 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~13.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv4.4.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases13.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.867

Issue & PR responsiveness

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 98/98 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs98
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

81Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
7.8/25Owner reach — 11 followers of goldenm-software
23.2/25Track record — 34 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingoldenm-software
public_repos34
account_age_days2,758

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 223 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/goldenm-software/layrz-sdk/go/v4, layrz-sdk
ecosystemsgo, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml, python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://developers.layrz.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdart, flutter, go, iot, layrz, models, python, sdk, telemetry, layrz-sdk
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://developers.layrz.com
docs_sitehttps://developers.layrz.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum, uv.lock
manifestsgo/go.mod, python/pyproject.toml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:layrz-sdk@4.4.6 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 18 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

90Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,869

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

91Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, dart/Makefile, go/Makefile, python/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml, python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — python/layrz_sdk/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 62 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile, dart/Makefile, go/Makefile, python/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/layrz_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.62
toolchain_manifestsgo/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Dart (statically typed)
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 2/364 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageDart
largest_source_bytes78,579
source_files_sampled364
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

0GitHub stars
6contributors
230commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • pypi download statistics for 'layrz-sdk' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/goldenm-software/layrz-sdk: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-09T14:09:44Z. Please include `CC64:1821A7:14E5D93:1438B91:6AA168A6` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go/go.mod
PyPIxlsxwriter>=3.2.5,<4.0.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.3python/pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopy>=2.4.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIshapely>=2.1.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIstrenum>=0.4.15python/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.4python/pyproject.toml
PyPItzdata>=2025.2python/pyproject.toml
PyPIty>=0.0.1a34python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 45 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
PyPIgeopy2.4.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIrequests2.33.1direct
PyPIshapely2.1.2direct
PyPIstrenum0.4.15direct
PyPIty0.0.29direct
PyPItzdata2026.1direct
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9direct
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.6indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIgeographiclib2.1indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlayrz-sdk4.4.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.0.1indirect
PyPInh30.3.4indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.4indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.9indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypes-shapely2.1.0.20260402indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:layrz-sdk@4.4.6 pulls in 18 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with goldenm-software/layrz-sdk. Read them side by side →

98pulumi/pulumiPulumi - Infrastructure as Code in any programming language 🚀Exceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100astropy/astropyAstronomy and astrophysics core libraryExceptional99Qiskit/qiskitQiskit is an open-source SDK for working with quantum computers at the level of extended quantum circuits, operators, and primitives.Exceptional99gradio-app/gradioBuild and share delightful machine learning apps, all in Python. 🌟 Star to support our work!Exceptional99apache/supersetApache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration PlatformExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, PyPI.