Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 05:05 UTC

goldenm-software / layrz-sdk

Software Development Kit for Layrz scripting and related topics. This is not an API connector.

Python · GoMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

goldenm-software/layrz-sdk holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Golden MOrganization
12 followers32 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/goldenm-software/layrz-sdk/go/v4v4.3.16-361 day ago—
PyPIlayrz-sdk4.3.16-2161 day agosdkgoldenmlcllayrz-compute-languagelayrz

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 224 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year224
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 40 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count40
latest_release_tagv4.3.16
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases10.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.868

Issue & PR responsiveness

70Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 89/89 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs89
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

76Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of goldenm-software
23.1/25Track record — 32 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logingoldenm-software
public_repos32
account_age_days2,704
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 216 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/goldenm-software/layrz-sdk/go/v4, layrz-sdk
ecosystemsgo, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://developers.layrz.com
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://developers.layrz.com
docs_sitehttps://developers.layrz.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

75Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,501
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, go/Makefile, python/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checking — python/layrz_sdk/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, go/Makefile, python/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspython/layrz_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (python/layrz_sdk/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/229 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes25,172
source_files_sampled229
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
6contributors
224commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
40releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 05:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go/go.mod
PyPIxlsxwriter>=3.2.5,<4.0.0python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.12.3python/pyproject.toml
PyPIgeopy>=2.4.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIshapely>=2.1.1python/pyproject.toml
PyPIstrenum>=0.4.15python/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.32.4python/pyproject.toml
PyPItzdata>=2025.2python/pyproject.toml
PyPIty>=0.0.1a34python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 45 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
PyPIgeopy2.4.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIrequests2.33.1direct
PyPIshapely2.1.2direct
PyPIstrenum0.4.15direct
PyPIty0.0.29direct
PyPItzdata2026.1direct
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9direct
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.5indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.6indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIgeographiclib2.1indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlayrz-sdk4.3.15indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.0.1indirect
PyPInh30.3.4indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.4indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.9indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypes-shapely2.1.0.20260402indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with goldenm-software/layrz-sdk. Read them side by side →

98github/copilot-sdkMulti-platform SDK for integrating GitHub Copilot Agent into apps and servicesExceptional96digital-asset/damlThe Daml smart contract languageExceptional94Looker-open-source/sdk-codegenOne SDK to rule them all, and in the codegen bind themExceptional94firecrawl/firecrawlThe context API to search, scrape, and interact with the web at scale. 🔥Exceptional94PurpleAILAB/DecepticonAutonomous Hacking Agent for Red TeamExceptional92grafana/grafana-foundation-sdkA set of tools, types and libraries for building and manipulating Grafana objects.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, PyPI.