Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 00:07 UTC

google / auto

A collection of source code generators for Java.

JavaApache-2.0★ 10,551 stars⑂ 1,224 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗

google/auto holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (59/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GoogleOrganization · verified domain
77,515 followers2,897 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavencom.google.auto:auto-common1.2.2-191172 days ago
Mavencom.google.auto.factory:auto-factory1.1.0-121011 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 9 days ago
29.1/36Commit cadence — 42/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 130 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year130
human_commit_share0.33
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year42
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 67 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 289 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~100.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count67
latest_release_tagauto-value-1.11.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release289
mean_days_between_releases100.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

92Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 10,551 stars
25/25Forks — 1,224 forks
14/15Watchers — 330 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,224
stars10,551
watchers330
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 81 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled81
top_contributor_share0.44
How it's scored
35.8/42Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
12.2/30PR acceptance — 639/1,577 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs639
open_issues73
closed_issues424
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.853
closed_unmerged_prs938
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 77,515 followers of google
25/25Track record — 2,897 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers77,515
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingoogle
public_repos2,897
account_age_days5,335
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on maven
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 1,011 days ago
20/20Version history — 19 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescom.google.auto:auto-common, com.google.auto.factory:auto-factory
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,011

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

81Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate7.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:com.google.auto:auto-common@1.2.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.3/40Legible commit history — 20 of 33 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.606
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — common/pom.xml, factory/pom.xml, factory/src/it/functional/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 67 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscommon/pom.xml, factory/pom.xml, factory/src/it/functional/pom.xml, service/annotations/pom.xml, service/pom.xml, service/processor/pom.xml, service/processor_ksp/pom.xml, value/annotations/pom.xml, value/pom.xml, value/processor/pom.xml, value/src/it/functional/pom.xml, value/src/it/gwtserializer/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.67
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.5/55Manageable file sizes — 3/322 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes171,986
source_files_sampled322
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

10,551GitHub stars
81contributors
130commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
67releases
2bus factor
73open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,224 ⇿
0Stars
1,224Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

02505007501,0001,2501,224132016-052021-072026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.6 / 10
7.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 00:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.google.guava:guava${guava.version}common/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.1common/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup:javapoet1.13.0common/pom.xml
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.1factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.auto:auto-common1.2.2factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.auto.value:auto-value-annotations${auto-value.version}factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.auto.service:auto-service-annotations${auto-service.version}factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava${guava.version}factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup:javapoet1.13.0factory/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava${guava.version}service/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.testing.compile:compile-testing0.23.0service/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.truth:truth${truth.version}service/pom.xml
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2service/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava${guava.version}value/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-gwt${guava.version}value/pom.xml
Mavencom.squareup:javapoet1.13.0value/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2value/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-testlib${guava.version}value/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.testing.compile:compile-testing0.23.0value/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.truth:truth1.4.5value/pom.xml
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2value/pom.xml
All dependencies 67

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.google.auto.service:auto-service-annotations1.1.1direct
Mavencom.google.auto.service:auto-service-annotationsHEAD-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavencom.google.auto.value:auto-value-annotations1.11.0direct
Mavencom.google.auto.value:auto-value-annotations1.11.1direct
Mavencom.google.auto.value:auto-value-annotationsHEAD-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavencom.google.auto:auto-common1.2.2direct
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr305—direct
Mavencom.google.code.findbugs:jsr3053.0.2direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava—direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.7.1-jredirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-gwt—direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-gwt33.7.1-jredirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-testlib—direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-testlib33.7.1-jredirect
Mavencom.google.testing.compile:compile-testing—direct
Mavencom.google.testing.compile:compile-testing0.23.0direct
Mavencom.google.truth:truth—direct
Mavencom.google.truth:truth1.4.5direct
Mavencom.squareup:javapoet—direct
Mavencom.squareup:javapoet1.13.0direct
Mavenjunit:junit—direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2direct
Mavenorg.jspecify:jspecify1.0.1direct
Mavenandroidx.room3:room3-compiler-processing-testing3.0.1indirect
Mavencom.google.auto.factory:auto-factory—indirect
Mavencom.google.auto.service:auto-service1.1.1indirect
Mavencom.google.auto.service:auto-serviceHEAD-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavencom.google.auto.service:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavencom.google.auto.value:auto-valueHEAD-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavencom.google.dagger:dagger2.42indirect
Mavencom.google.devtools.ksp:symbol-processing-api2.3.11indirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.50.0indirect
Mavencom.google.escapevelocity:escapevelocity1.1indirect
Mavencom.google.inject:guice5.1.0indirect
Mavencom.google.testparameterinjector:test-parameter-injector1.22indirect
Mavendev.gradleplugins:gradle-test-kit8.11.1indirect
Mavenjakarta.inject:jakarta.inject-api2.0.1indirect
Mavenjavax.inject:javax.inject1indirect
Mavennet.ltgt.gradle.incap:incap1.0.0indirect
Mavennet.ltgt.gwt.maven:gwt-maven-plugin1.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin1.1.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.8.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-invoker-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin3.6.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.checkerframework:checker-compat-qual2.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.checkerframework:checker-qual4.2.2indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.jdt:ecj3.46.0indirect
Mavenorg.gwtproject:gwt2.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.gwtproject:gwt-dev—indirect
Mavenorg.gwtproject:gwt-user—indirect
Mavenorg.gwtproject:gwt-user2.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.immutables.tools:maven-shade-plugin4indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-maven-plugin2.4.10indirect
Mavenorg.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib2.4.10indirect
Mavenorg.ow2.asm:asm9.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:com.google.auto:auto-common@1.2.2 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.