Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 21:55 UTC

google / brotli

Brotli compression format

TypeScript · CMIT★ 14,856 stars⑂ 1,350 forkssince Oct 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

google/brotli holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (62/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GoogleOrganization · verified domain
77,507 followers2,897 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmbrotlipoints to another repo — not scored1.3.360,484,43791541 days agocompressdecompressencodedecode
Gogithub.com/google/brotli/go/brotliv1.1.1-rc0-1435 days ago—
Gogithub.com/google/brotli/go/cbrotliv1.1.0-21094 days ago—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 203 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year203
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 304 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~288.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv1.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release304
mean_days_between_releases288.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

92Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 14,856 stars
25/25Forks — 1,350 forks
13.9/15Watchers — 321 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,350
stars14,856
watchers321
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.472
How it's scored
35.2/42Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
22.5/30PR acceptance — 758/1,010 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs758
open_issues76
closed_issues397
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.839
closed_unmerged_prs252
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 77,507 followers of google
25/25Track record — 2,897 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers77,507
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingoogle
public_repos2,897
account_age_days5,335
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on go
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 435 days ago
12/20Version history — 2 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/google/brotli/go/brotli, github.com/google/brotli/go/cbrotli
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish435

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — setup.cfg ([yapf])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:brotli@1.3.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.3/40Legible commit history — 36 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.474
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — python/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — setup.cfg ([yapf])
11/11Static type checking — TypeScript (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 24 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filespython/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestscsharp/brotlidec.Tests.csproj, csharp/brotlidec.csproj, go/brotli/go.mod, go/cbrotli/go.mod, java/org/brotli/dec/pom.xml, java/org/brotli/integration/pom.xml, java/org/brotli/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.24
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
50.2/55Manageable file sizes — 21/241 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes13,049,704
source_files_sampled241
oversized_source_files21

Key facts

14,856GitHub stars
99contributors
203commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
76open issues
npm, NuGet, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'brotli' points at a different repository (https://github.com/devongovett/brotli.js); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,350 ⇿
0Stars
1,350Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,350122016-092021-092026-08
Major 1Minor 3Patch 9

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 21:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
5Code-ReviewFound 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
7SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0csharp/brotlidec.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3.14.0csharp/brotlidec.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.2.0csharp/brotlidec.Tests.csproj
npmyargs~8.0.2js/package.json
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 12 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmyargs~8.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0direct
NuGetNUnit3.14.0direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter5.2.0direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin6.0.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.14.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.4.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.4indirect
Mavenorg.brotli:dec1.2.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.plugins:nexus-staging-maven-plugin1.7.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:brotli@1.3.3 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, Go.