Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 20:46 UTC

google / flatbuffers

FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library

C++ · RustApache-2.0★ 26,295 stars⑂ 3,612 forkssince May 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMobile applicationhow this is determined

google/flatbuffers holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated 43 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

GoogleOrganization
76,396 followers2,889 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmflatbuffers25.9.2330,969,07938314 days agoflatbuffers
Packagistgoogle/flatbuffersv25.12.194,39540227 days agoserializationgoogleflatbuffers
Mavencom.google.flatbuffers:flatbuffers-java25.2.10-29539 days ago
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19-26227 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 43 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume186 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year186
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push43
active_weeks_last_year28
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases45 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 178 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~78 days
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv25.12.19-2026-02-06-03fffb2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release178
mean_days_between_releases78

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars26,295 stars
25/25Forks3,612 forks
15/15Watchers628 watchers
Inputs used
forks3,612
stars26,295
watchers628
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads30,973,474 downloads/month across maven, npm, packagist, pypi
4.7/20Registry dependents4 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesflatbuffers, google/flatbuffers, com.google.flatbuffers:flatbuffers-java, flatbuffers
dependents4
ecosystemsmaven, npm, packagist, pypi
total_downloads153,146
monthly_downloads30,973,474
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.219
How it's scored
40.3/42Issue resolution96% of issues closed
21.9/30PR acceptance2,120/2,908 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 28/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs2,120
open_issues105
closed_issues2,548
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio0.96
closed_unmerged_prs788
first_time_authors_30d6
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d6
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach76,396 followers of google
25/25Track record2,889 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers76,396
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingoogle
public_repos2,889
account_age_days5,312
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on maven, npm, packagist, pypi
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 227 days ago
20/20Version history40 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesflatbuffers, google/flatbuffers, com.google.flatbuffers:flatbuffers-java, flatbuffers
ecosystemsmaven, npm, packagist, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish227

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

94Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://flatbuffers.dev/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsflatbuffers, serialization, serialization-library, json-parser, marshalling, rpc, zero-copy, mmap, cross-platform, c-plus-plus, java, c-sharp, go, python, rust, javascript, typescript, grpc, c, protobuf
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://flatbuffers.dev/
docs_sitehttps://flatbuffers.dev/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 28/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
1.5/7.5Signed-Releases1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier30
security_posture_before_jurisdiction59
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories30
affected_packages8
assessed_packages179
unassessed_packages25
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 5
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 179 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history89 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.937
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapgrpc/samples/greeter/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkinggrpc/examples/ts/greeter/tsconfig.json, python/py.typed, tests/ts/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesgrpc/samples/greeter/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsgrpc/examples/ts/greeter/tsconfig.json, python/py.typed, tests/ts/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsandroid/app/build.gradle, android/build.gradle, examples/go-echo/go.mod, grpc/examples/go/greeter/client/go.mod, grpc/examples/go/greeter/models/go.mod, grpc/examples/go/greeter/server/go.mod, grpc/flatbuffers-java-grpc/pom.xml, grpc/pom.xml, grpc/tests/pom.xml, java/pom.xml, kotlin/benchmark/build.gradle.kts, kotlin/build.gradle.kts, kotlin/convention-plugins/build.gradle.kts, kotlin/flatbuffers-kotlin/build.gradle.kts, net/FlatBuffers/Google.FlatBuffers.csproj, rust/flatbuffers/Cargo.toml, rust/flexbuffers/Cargo.toml, rust/reflection/Cargo.toml, samples/go.mod, tests/FlatBuffers.Benchmarks/FlatBuffers.Benchmarks.csproj, tests/FlatBuffers.Test/FlatBuffers.Test.csproj, tests/rust_no_std_compilation_test/Cargo.toml, tests/rust_reflection_test/Cargo.toml, tests/rust_serialize_test/Cargo.toml, tests/rust_usage_test/Cargo.toml, tests/rust_usage_test/outdir/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC++ (statically typed)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes42/1,317 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes181,011
source_files_sampled1,317
oversized_source_files42
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)tests/prototest/imported.proto, tests/prototest/non-positive-id.proto, tests/prototest/test.proto, tests/prototest/twice-id.proto, tests/prototest/use-reserved-id.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, examples, sample, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, sample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filestests/prototest/imported.proto, tests/prototest/non-positive-id.proto, tests/prototest/test.proto, tests/prototest/twice-id.proto, tests/prototest/use-reserved-id.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

26,295GitHub stars
99contributors
186commits, last 12 months
43days since last push
45releases
4bus factor
105open issues
Go, Maven, npm, Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3,612 ⇿
0Stars
3,612Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2,5002,7503,0003,2503,5003,7503,612152022-072024-072026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 26

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 20:46 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 28/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained5 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
2Signed-Releases1 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 1 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 204 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhowindirect
crates.ioarray-initindirect
crates.ioassert_approx_eqindirect
crates.iobencherindirect
crates.iobitflagsindirect
crates.iobyteorderindirect
crates.iolibc_allocindirect
crates.ionum-traitsindirect
crates.ionum_enumindirect
crates.ioquickcheckindirect
crates.ioquickcheck_deriveindirect
crates.iorandindirect
crates.iorustc_versionindirect
crates.ioserdeindirect
crates.ioserde_bytesindirect
crates.ioserde_deriveindirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
crates.iostatic_assertionsindirect
crates.iothiserrorindirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffers1.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffers2.0.8+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffers22.10.26+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffers/go0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000indirect
Gogithub.com/google/flatbuffers/grpc/examples/go/greeter/models0.0.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.35.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.39.0-devindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.56.3indirect
Mavencom.google.flatbuffers:flatbuffers-javaindirect
Mavencom.google.flatbuffers:flatbuffers-java-grpcindirect
Mavencom.google.truth:truth1.1.3indirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-core1.67.1indirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-netty2.0.3indirect
Mavenio.grpc:grpc-stub2.0.3indirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin5.1.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.0.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin2.5.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-pluginindirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:build-helper-maven-plugin1.12indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin1.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.plugins:nexus-staging-maven-plugin1.6.7indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.plugins:nexus-staging-maven-plugin1.6.8indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.5indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.7.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.20.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.2.3indirect
npm@eslint/core0.14.0indirect
npm@eslint/core0.15.2indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.1indirect
npm@eslint/js9.29.0indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.6indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.3.5indirect
npm@grpc/grpc-js^1.3.2indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.6indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.3.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node24.0.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.34.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.34.1indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.14.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.12indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.3.7indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmesbuild0.25.5indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.29.0indirect
npmeslint-scope8.4.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatbuffers../../../indirect
npmflatbuffers^2.0.0indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.5indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.23indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimatch9.0.9indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.3indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils2.1.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.8.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.34.1indirect
npmundici-types7.8.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.11.3indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet.Diagnostics.Windows0.11.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub8.0.0indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 179 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpc1.35.0indirectcritical61.82.1
google.golang.org/grpc1.39.0-devindirectcritical61.82.1
google.golang.org/grpc1.56.3indirectcritical41.82.1
brace-expansion1.1.12indirecthigh45.0.9
brace-expansion2.0.2indirecthigh45.0.9
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh24.3.0
lodash4.17.23indirecthigh24.18.0
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm, Packagist, Maven, PyPI.