Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 19:23 UTC

google / gson

A Java serialization/deserialization library to convert Java Objects into JSON and back

JavaApache-2.0★ 24,235 stars⑂ 4,476 forkssince Mar 2015View on GitHub ↗

google/gson holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (57/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 81 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GoogleOrganization · verified domain
78,658 followers2,904 public repossince Jan 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.0-44146 days ago
Mavencom.google.code.gson:proto2.13.2-rc1-1371 days ago
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson-extras2.13.2-rc1-1371 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 107 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year107
human_commit_share0.79
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 13 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 145 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~151.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count13
latest_release_taggson-parent-2.14.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release145
mean_days_between_releases151.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 24,235 stars
25/25Forks — 4,476 forks
15/15Watchers — 739 watchers
Inputs used
forks4,476
stars24,235
watchers739
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.363
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed
21.5/30PR acceptance — 879/1,226 decided PRs merged
3.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 3/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs879
open_issues223
closed_issues1,450
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d23
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d30
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs347
first_time_authors_30d11
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d11
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 78,658 followers of google
25/25Track record — 2,904 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers78,658
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingoogle
public_repos2,904
account_age_days5,355

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 146 days ago
20/20Version history — 44 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescom.google.code.gson:gson, com.google.code.gson:proto, com.google.code.gson:gson-extras
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish146

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

57Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

95Exceptional · 16% of overall

Security posture

94Exceptional
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate9.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:com.google.code.gson:gson@2.14.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 76 of 79 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.962
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — extras/pom.xml, gson/pom.xml, metrics/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 21 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsextras/pom.xml, gson/pom.xml, metrics/pom.xml, pom.xml, proto/pom.xml, test-graal-native-image/pom.xml, test-jpms/pom.xml, test-shrinker/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.21
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/264 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes94,670
source_files_sampled264
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — proto/src/test/protobuf/annotations.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/bag.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/json_test.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/json_test_proto2.proto
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesproto/src/test/protobuf/annotations.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/bag.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/json_test.proto, proto/src/test/protobuf/json_test_proto2.proto
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

24,235GitHub stars
99contributors
107commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
13releases
2bus factor
223open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 28 authors (cap 12)
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.google.code.gson:gson-metrics' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.google.code.gson:test-jpms' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.google.code.gson:test-shrinker' from its registry
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.google.code.gson:test-graal-native-image' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4,476 ⇿
0Stars
4,476Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

3,0003,5004,0004,5004,476112021-082024-032026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 9.4 / 10
9.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 19:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 23/24 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.1-SNAPSHOTextras/pom.xml
Mavenjavax.annotation:jsr250-api1.0extras/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.50.0gson/pom.xml
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-base7.9.1gson/pom.xml
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-core9.3.2gson/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${project.parent.version}metrics/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.22.2metrics/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.caliper:caliper1.0-beta-3metrics/pom.xml
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2pom.xml
Mavencom.google.truth:truth1.4.5pom.xml
Maven${project.groupId}:${project.artifactId}0.0.0-JAPICMP-OLDpom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${project.parent.version}proto/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java${protobufVersion}proto/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.7.0-jreproto/pom.xml
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom6.1.3test-graal-native-image/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${project.parent.version}test-graal-native-image/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${project.parent.version}test-jpms/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson${project.parent.version}test-shrinker/pom.xml
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-base7.9.1test-shrinker/pom.xml
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-core9.3.2test-shrinker/pom.xml
Mavencom.android.tools:r89.4.14test-shrinker/pom.xml
All dependencies 59

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 43 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.android.tools:r89.4.14direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.22.2direct
Mavencom.google.caliper:caliper1.0-beta-3direct
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson—direct
Mavencom.google.code.gson:gson2.14.1-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavencom.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations2.50.0direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.7.0-jredirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java4.35.1direct
Mavencom.google.truth:truth—direct
Mavencom.google.truth:truth1.4.5direct
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-base7.9.1direct
Mavencom.guardsquare:proguard-core9.3.2direct
Mavenjavax.annotation:jsr250-api1.0direct
Mavenjunit:junit—direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2direct
Mavenorg.junit:junit-bom6.1.3direct
Mavenbiz.aQute.bnd:bnd-maven-plugin6.4.0indirect
Mavencom.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavencom.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin3.10.0indirect
Mavencom.github.siom79.japicmp:japicmp-maven-plugin0.26.1indirect
Mavencom.github.wvengen:proguard-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavencom.github.wvengen:proguard-maven-plugin2.7.0indirect
Mavencom.google.guava:guava-testlib33.7.0-jreindirect
Mavencom.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util4.35.1indirect
Mavencom.google.testparameterinjector:test-parameter-injector1.22indirect
Mavencom.google.truth.extensions:truth-proto-extension1.4.5indirect
Mavenio.github.ascopes:protobuf-maven-plugin5.1.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin3.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-artifact-plugin3.6.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.15.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin3.1.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin3.6.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin3.1.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin3.6.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin3.5.6indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:animal-sniffer-maven-plugin1.27indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.6.3indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:templating-maven-plugin3.1.0indirect
Mavenorg.graalvm.buildtools:native-maven-plugin1.1.9indirect
Mavenorg.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter—indirect
Mavenorg.junit.platform:junit-platform-launcher—indirect
Mavenorg.moditect:moditect-maven-plugin1.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:com.google.code.gson:gson@2.14.0 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.