Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 09:33 UTC

gp-pereira / refactorex

A VS Code extension for fast and reliable Elixir code refactoring.

ElixirMIT★ 279 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Apr 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#elixir#code-actions#developer-tools#refactoring#vs-code#lsp#refactor

gp-pereira/refactorex holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (55/100) and lowest on Security (22/100). It was last updated 373 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 41 is calibrated to 36 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Gabriel PereiraPersonal account
22 followers5 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Hexrefactorex0.1.546,92410373 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 373 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push373
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

68Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 50 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 373 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tag0.1.54
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release373
mean_days_between_releases16.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

49Weak
How it's scored
39.6/60Stars — 279 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars279
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

64Moderate
How it's scored
51.2/80Monthly downloads — 6,924 downloads/month across hex
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrefactorex
dependents—
ecosystemshex
total_downloads58,292
monthly_downloads6,924
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.987

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate
How it's scored
32.9/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
18.8/30PR acceptance — 5/8 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs5
open_issues5
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.783
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

47Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
9.8/25Owner reach — 22 followers of gp-pereira
17.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers22
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingp-pereira
public_repos5
account_age_days2,485
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 373 days ago
20/20Version history — 10 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrefactorex
ecosystemshex
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish373

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=gp-pereira.refatorex
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselixir, code-actions, developer-tools, refactoring, vs-code, lsp, refactor
has_wikino
homepagehttps://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=gp-pereira.refatorex
docs_sitehttps://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=gp-pereira.refatorex
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

22At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

22At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — extensions/vscode/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configsextensions/vscode/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Elixir with type-check config (extensions/vscode/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/96 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageElixir
largest_source_bytes11,427
source_files_sampled96
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

279GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
373days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
5open issues
Hexpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch hex package 'refactorex_workspace' from its registry
  • Could not fetch hex package 'refactorex_lsp' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.2 / 10
2.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 09:32 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Hexsourceror~> 1.7refactorex/mix.exs
Hexgen_lsp~> 0.3.0refactorex_lsp/mix.exs
Hexrefactorex../refactorexrefactorex_lsp/mix.exs
All dependencies 138

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@aashutoshrathi/word-wrap1.2.6indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.10.0indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.11.14indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node18.19.30indirect
npm@types/semver7.5.8indirect
npm@types/vscode1.88.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys6.21.0indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.2.0indirect
npmacorn8.11.3indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.0indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.3.1indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.1indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch5.1.6indirect
npmminimatch9.0.3indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.3indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils1.3.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypescript5.4.4indirect
npmundici-types5.26.5indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvscode-jsonrpc8.2.0indirect
npmvscode-languageclient9.0.1indirect
npmvscode-languageserver-protocol3.17.5indirect
npmvscode-languageserver-types3.17.5indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with gp-pereira/refactorex. Read them side by side →

89software-mansion/live-debuggerTool for debugging LiveView applicationsExcellent89repowise-dev/repowiseCodebase intelligence for AI and humans: code health scores, auto-generated docs, git analytics, dead code detection, and architectural decisions via MCP.Excellent87Cranot/roam-codeLocal codebase intelligence CLI + MCP server for AI coding agents: SQLite code graph, 28 languages, 238 commands, 224 MCP tools, change-safety gates, audit evidence, zero API keys.Excellent86Oolab-labs/patchwork-osThe decision layer for personal AI. Local-first runtime where agents automate across GitHub, Slack, Gmail & 45+ services — but every risky action can stop for your yes, workers (agents) earn autonomy from track record, and every decision leaves a receipt. Your models, your machine, your policy. Includes an MCP bridge: 180 IDE tools for Claude Code.Excellent99taskforcesh/bullmqBullMQ - Message Queue and Batch processing for NodeJS, Python, .NET, Elixir, Rust and PHP based on Redis or PostgreSQLExceptional97supabase/realtimeBroadcast, Presence, and Postgres Changes via WebSocketsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.