Public record
Software health reportschema 0.16.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 18:27 UTC

green-api / whatsapp-api-client-js

This library helps you easily create a javascript application with Whatsapp support

JavaScriptMIT★ 154 stars⑂ 38 forkssince May 2020View on GitHub ↗

green-api/whatsapp-api-client-js holds a health index of 12 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

12
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

12
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Green APIOrganization
148 followers80 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmexamplespoints to another repo — not scored0.1.03,25514252 days agodocsdocumentationgenerategeneratormarkdowntemplatesverb
npm@green-api/whatsapp-api-clientpoints to another repo — not scored0.4.83,837715 days agowhatsappwhatsapp-apiwhatsapp-librarywhatsapp-send-messagewhatsapp-senderwhatsapp-message-sender

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence3/52 weeks with commits
12.6/18Commit volume24 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year24
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year3
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 7 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~134.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv0.4.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases134.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.4/60Stars154 stars
13.1/25Forks38 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks38
stars154
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 28% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.284
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
17.5/30PR acceptance84/144 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs84
open_issues0
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs60
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.6/25Owner reach148 followers of green-api
25/25Track record80 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers148
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingreen-api
public_repos80
account_age_days2,264
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://green-api.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswhatsapp, whatsapp-api, whatsapp-library, whatsapp-sender, whatsapp-send-message, whatsapp-message-sender, whatsapp-bot, whatsapp-chat
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://green-api.com
docs_sitehttps://green-api.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier20
security_posture_after_multiplier9
security_posture_before_jurisdiction44
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 20% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.
How it's scored
15.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: axios 1.16.1 (moderate 6.5), fs 0.0.1-security (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 339 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories12
affected_packages4
assessed_packages137
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 137 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/40 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes33,163
source_files_sampled40
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

154GitHub stars
21contributors
24commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
24releases
3bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package 'examples' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jonschlinkert/examples); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@green-api/whatsapp-api-client' points at a different repository (https://github.com/green-api/whatsapp-api-client); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 18:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests3 out of 6 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained24 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@green-api/whatsapp-api-client^0.3.39examples/package.json
npm@green-api/whatsapp-api-client^0.4.6package.json
npmaxios^1.16.1package.json
npmfs0.0.1-securitypackage.json
npmjsdom^29.1.1package.json
npmmime^4.1.0package.json
npmrollup^4.60.4package.json
All dependencies 137

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 131 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@green-api/whatsapp-api-client0.4.6direct
npmaxios1.16.1direct
npmfs0.0.1-securitydirect
npmjsdom29.1.1direct
npmmime4.1.0direct
npmrollup4.60.4direct
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color5.1.11indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector7.1.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/generational-cache1.0.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/nwsapi2.3.9indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.0.2indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.2.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.1.1indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.4indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs29.0.2indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-json6.1.0indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve16.0.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-terser1.0.0indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.3.0indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/resolve1.20.2indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcommondir1.0.1indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdeepmerge4.3.1indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmform-data4.0.5indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.3indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.2indirect
npmis-module1.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmis-reference1.2.1indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmrollup-plugin-progress1.1.2indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmserialize-javascript7.0.5indirect
npmsmob1.6.2indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmterser5.48.0indirect
npmtldts7.4.0indirect
npmtldts-core7.4.0indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.1indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmundici7.26.0indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 137 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
form-data4.0.5indirecthigh14.0.6
undici7.26.0indirecthigh78.5.0
axios1.16.1directmoderate31.18.0
fs0.0.1-securitydirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.16.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.