Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 16:28 UTC

griptape-ai / griptape-cli

CLI tool for the Griptape Framework and Cloud

PythonApache-2.0★ 7 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

griptape-ai/griptape-cli holds a health index of 36 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (77/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 753 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

36
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

36
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GriptapeOrganization · verified domain
198 followers94 public repossince Jan 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIgriptape-cli0.6.0328772 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 753 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push753
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

60Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 999 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv0.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release999
mean_days_between_releases3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

16Critical
How it's scored
12.6/60Stars — 7 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
3.9/15Watchers — 6 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars7
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

25At Risk
How it's scored
20.2/80Monthly downloads — 32 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgriptape-cli
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads32
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

56Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.423

Issue & PR responsiveness

97Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 33/34 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs33
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

87Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
16.5/25Owner reach — 198 followers of griptape-ai
20.3/25Track record — 94 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers198
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingriptape-ai
public_repos94
account_age_days1,331

Package maintenance

69Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 772 days ago
20/20Version history — 8 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgriptape-cli
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish772

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

40Weak
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

79Good
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
10/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: starlette 0.37.2 (high 7.5)
33.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 697 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories14
affected_packages1
assessed_packages55
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the pypi:griptape-cli@0.6.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 55 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.8/40Legible commit history — 31 of 52 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.596
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 52
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes9,758
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

7GitHub stars
6contributors
0commits, last 12 months
753days since last push
2releases
2bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 16:28 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick^8.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIgriptape^0.25.0pyproject.toml
PyPIattrs^23.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn^0.29.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfastapi^0.110.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv^1.0.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 64

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 58 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIattrs23.2.0direct
PyPIclick8.1.7direct
PyPIfastapi0.110.3direct
PyPIgriptape0.25.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.0.1direct
PyPIuvicorn0.29.0direct
PyPIannotated-types0.6.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.3.0indirect
PyPIblack23.12.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.3.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIdateparser1.2.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocker6.1.3indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.0.3indirect
PyPIh110.14.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.5indirect
PyPIhttptools0.6.1indirect
PyPIhttpx0.27.0indirect
PyPIidna3.7indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.4indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImarshmallow3.21.2indirect
PyPImarshmallow-enum1.5.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPInumpy1.26.4indirect
PyPIopenai1.26.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.2.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.7.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.18.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.18.0indirect
PyPIpytest8.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.14.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpytz2024.1indirect
PyPIpywin32306indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIregex2024.4.28indirect
PyPIrequests2.31.0indirect
PyPIrich13.7.1indirect
PyPIschema0.7.7indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy1.4.52indirect
PyPIstarlette0.37.2indirect
PyPIstringcase1.2.0indirect
PyPItenacity8.2.3indirect
PyPItiktoken0.6.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.66.4indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.11.0indirect
PyPItzdata2024.1indirect
PyPItzlocal5.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.1indirect
PyPIuvloop0.19.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles0.21.0indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.8.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets12.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:griptape-cli@0.6.0 pulls in 55 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
starlette0.37.2indirecthigh141.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with griptape-ai/griptape-cli. Read them side by side →

100OSGeo/gdalGDAL is an open source MIT licensed translator library for raster and vector geospatial data formats.Exceptional100astropy/astropyAstronomy and astrophysics core libraryExceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100NVIDIA-NeMo/SpeechA scalable generative AI framework built for researchers and developers working on Large Language Models, Multimodal, and Speech AI (Automatic Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech)Exceptional100kubeflow/trainerDistributed AI Model Training and LLM Fine-Tuning on KubernetesExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.