Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 03:46 UTC

grpc-ecosystem / go-grpc-middleware

Golang gRPC Middlewares: interceptor chaining, auth, logging, retries and more.

GoApache-2.0★ 6,763 stars⑂ 746 forkssince May 2016View on GitHub ↗

grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (90/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated today. 13 contributors account for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

gRPC EcosystemOrganization
1,190 followers22 public repossince May 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware/v2v2.3.4-146 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases26 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~118.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count26
latest_release_tagv2.3.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases118.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

90Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars6,763 stars
23.9/25Forks746 forks
10.5/15Watchers80 watchers
Inputs used
forks746
stars6,763
watchers80
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

86Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
54/54Bus factor13 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
20/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 11% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor13
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.109
How it's scored
33.2/42Issue resolution79% of issues closed
19.4/30PR acceptance337/520 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs337
open_issues58
closed_issues219
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.791
closed_unmerged_prs183
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22.1/25Owner reach1,190 followers of grpc-ecosystem
21.9/25Track record22 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,190
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingrpc-ecosystem
public_repos22
account_age_days3,758

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 6 days ago
20/20Version history14 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgrpc, golang, middleware, generic-functions, library, logging, authentication, retries, testing, interceptor
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfilespublished library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesgo.sum
manifests.bingo/go.mod, examples/go.mod, go.mod
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories5 affected: google.golang.org/grpc 1.74.2 (critical 9.1), google.golang.org/grpc v1.74.2 (critical 9.1), golang.org/x/net 0.40.0 (moderate 6.5), +2 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
20.6/40No advisories left outstanding5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 203 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories54
affected_packages16
assessed_packages70
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 3, moderate 4, unknown 7
direct_affected_packages5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 70 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history88 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.946
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests.bingo/go.mod, examples/go.mod, go.mod, interceptors/logging/examples/go.mod, providers/prometheus/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/105 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes35,050
source_files_sampled105
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)testing/testpb/v1/test.proto, testing/testvalidate/v1/test_validate.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filestesting/testpb/v1/test.proto, testing/testvalidate/v1/test_validate.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

6,763GitHub stars
99contributors
15commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
26releases
13bus factor
58open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware: run: RepoClient.LocalPath: error during tarballHandler.setup: internal error: handler.httpClient.Do: Get "https://codeload.github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware/legacy.tar.gz/refs/heads/main": internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: internal error: innerTransport.RoundTrip: error in HTTP: dial tcp: lookup codeload.github.com on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 746 ⇿
0Stars
746Forks
25Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375500625750741112016-102021-092026-08
Major 2Minor 7Patch 6

Each point covers 10 days.

Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gobuf.build/gen/go/bufbuild/protovalidate/protocolbuffers/gov1.36.10-20250912141014-52f32327d4b0.1go.mod
Gobuf.build/go/protovalidatev1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.47.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.30.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.74.2go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.10go.mod
All dependencies 70

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 57 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gobuf.build/gen/go/bufbuild/protovalidate/protocolbuffers/go1.36.10-20250912141014-52f32327d4b0.1direct
Gobuf.build/go/protovalidate1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.4direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.40.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.47.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.47.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth20.30.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.74.2direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.74.2direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.10direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.36.6direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.10direct
Go../providers/prometheus1.0.0indirect
Gocel.dev/expr0.24.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/antlr4-go/antlr/v44.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-kit/logv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmtv0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logr1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdr1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/cel-go0.26.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuid1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware/v22.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compress1.17.9indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.14indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautoneg0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/oklog/run1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.20.5indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.37.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.55.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.15.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/zerologv1.29.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stoewer/go-strcase1.3.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk1.1.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpc0.56.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel1.36.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace1.31.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric1.36.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk1.36.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace1.36.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.7.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.6.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/exp0.0.0-20250620022241-b7579e27df2bindirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.33.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.25.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.31.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api0.0.0-20250603155806-513f23925822indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20250528174236-200df99c418aindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc0.0.0-20250603155806-513f23925822indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20250603155806-513f23925822indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.90.1indirect
Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 70 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 5 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpc1.74.2directcritical41.82.1
google.golang.org/grpcv1.74.2directcritical41.82.1
github.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.0indirecthigh21.9.3
go.opentelemetry.io/otel1.36.0indirecthigh21.41.0
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk1.36.0indirecthigh41.43.0
golang.org/x/net0.40.0directmoderate111.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/net0.47.0directmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/netv0.47.0directmoderate91.27.0-rc.3
github.com/google/cel-go0.26.1indirectmoderate20.30.0
github.com/klauspost/compress1.17.9indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/sys0.33.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/sys0.38.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.38.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.25.0indirectunknown10.39.0
golang.org/x/text0.31.0indirectunknown10.39.0
golang.org/x/textv0.31.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.