Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 13:41 UTC

gsrxyz / rusteron

A Rust client wrapper for Aeron C bindings

RustApache-2.0★ 62 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗

gsrxyz/rusteron holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Security (38/100). It was last updated 16 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GSROrganization · verified domain
9 followers2 public repossince Dec 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iorusteron-client0.2.522,91314416 days agoaeronaeron-c-bindingsaeron-clientlow-latencynetworkingnetwork-programming
crates.iorusteron-archive0.2.539,21214416 days agoaeronaeron-archiveaeron-c-bindingslow-latencynetworkingnetwork-programming
crates.iorusteron-code-gen0.2.563,56117116 days ago
crates.iorusteron-media-driver0.2.524,53314416 days agoaeronaeron-c-bindingslow-latencymedia-drivernetworkingnetwork-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 16 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence14/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18Commit volume54 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained22 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year54
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push16
active_weeks_last_year14
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 16 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv0.2.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release16
mean_days_between_releases18.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29/60Stars62 stars
9.3/25Forks14 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars62
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
69/80Monthly downloads150,219 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrusteron-client, rusteron-archive, rusteron-code-gen, rusteron-media-driver
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads1,401,330
monthly_downloads150,219
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 73% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.728
How it's scored
34.7/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance29/35 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues4
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.826
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of gsrxyz
6.9/25Track record2 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingsrxyz
public_repos2
account_age_days633

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 16 days ago
20/20Version history171 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrusteron-client, rusteron-archive, rusteron-code-gen, rusteron-media-driver
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish16

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter configrustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://gsrxyz.github.io/rusteron/rusteron_client/index.html
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://gsrxyz.github.io/rusteron/rusteron_client/index.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained22 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40Legible commit history61 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.61
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap.justfile, rusteron-docker-samples/.justfile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configrustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files.justfile, rusteron-docker-samples/.justfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, rusteron-archive/Cargo.toml, rusteron-client/Cargo.toml, rusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml, rusteron-docker-samples/rusteron-dummy-example/Cargo.toml, rusteron-media-driver/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
41.5/55Manageable file sizes16/65 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes2,971,039
source_files_sampled65
oversized_source_files16
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

62GitHub stars
7contributors
54commits, last 12 months
16days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
4open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151412025-072026-022026-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 21
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10
3.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 13:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests6 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iologrusteron-archive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregexrusteron-archive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioctrlcrusteron-client/Cargo.toml
crates.iologrusteron-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-formatrusteron-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregexrusteron-client/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertoolsrusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.iologrusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2rusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquoterusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregexrusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.iosynrusteron-code-gen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioctrlcrusteron-media-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.iologrusteron-media-driver/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregexrusteron-media-driver/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.