Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 23:36 UTC

guardrails-ai / guardrails-api-client

OpenAPI Specifications and scripts for generating SDKs for the various Guardrails services

JavaScript · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗

guardrails-ai/guardrails-api-client holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (62/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (17/100). It was last updated 93 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Guardrails AIOrganization · verified domain

234 followers97 public repossince Jul 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
npm	@guardrails-ai/api-client	0.4.0	26	18	360 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

36Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

20At Risk

How it's scored

9.9/36	Push recency — last push 93 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
8.6/18	Commit volume — 8 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	8
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	93
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

60Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 5 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 881 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~9.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	5
latest_release_tag	v0.2.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	881
mean_days_between_releases	9.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

17Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 2 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	2
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

24At Risk

How it's scored

19.1/80	Monthly downloads — 26 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@guardrails-ai/api-client
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	26
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.874

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
27.9/30	PR acceptance — 27/29 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	27
open_issues	1
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

86Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
17/25	Owner reach — 234 followers of guardrails-ai
19.3/25	Track record — 97 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	234
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	guardrails-ai
public_repos	97
account_age_days	1,148

Package maintenance

91Excellent

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
26/35	Publish recency — latest publish 360 days ago
20/20	Version history — 18 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@guardrails-ai/api-client
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	360

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

37Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

28At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
4/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 2 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 6/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
1/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 59 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	63
affected_packages	13
assessed_packages	172
unassessed_packages	4
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 7, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 172 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

41Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

10Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
10.2/40	Legible commit history — 19 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.192
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

49Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — resources/py/Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — resources/ts/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	resources/py/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	resources/ts/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (resources/ts/tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/10 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	14,489
source_files_sampled	10
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

2GitHub stars

4contributors

8commits, last 12 months

93days since last push

5releases

1bus factor

1open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'guardrails-api-client' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 23:36 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
8	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2	CI-Tests	2 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 6/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
2	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	59 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 176

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@borewit/text-codec	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	@hyperjump/browser	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@hyperjump/json-pointer	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@hyperjump/json-schema	`1.16.2`	indirect
npm	@hyperjump/pact	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@hyperjump/uri	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/core	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/select	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/type	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@lukeed/csprng	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@nestjs/axios	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	@nestjs/common	`11.1.17`	indirect
npm	@nestjs/core	`11.1.18`	indirect
npm	@nuxt/opencollective	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@nuxtjs/opencollective	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	@openapitools/openapi-generator-cli	`2.31.1`	indirect
npm	@tokenizer/inflate	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	@tokenizer/token	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	@tootallnate/quickjs-emscripten	`0.23.0`	indirect
npm	@types/mute-stream	`0.0.4`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`20.12.11`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`20.19.39`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.4.0`	indirect
npm	@types/wrap-ansi	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`7.1.4`	indirect
npm	ansi-escapes	`4.3.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-sequence-parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	ast-types	`0.13.4`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	axios	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	basic-ftp	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	cli-spinners	`2.9.2`	indirect
npm	cli-width	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	clone	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	commander	`8.3.0`	indirect
npm	compare-versions	`6.1.1`	indirect
npm	concurrently	`9.2.1`	indirect
npm	consola	`2.15.3`	indirect
npm	consola	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	console.table	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	data-uri-to-buffer	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	defaults	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	degenerator	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	easy-table	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	escodegen	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esprima	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-safe-stringify	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	figures	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	file-type	`21.3.2`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.15.11`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`11.3.4`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	get-uri	`6.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob	`13.0.6`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	handlebars	`4.7.8`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-proxy-agent	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	ieee754	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	ip-address	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	iterare	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	json-stringify-deterministic	`1.0.12`	indirect
npm	jsonc-parser	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	just-curry-it	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	load-esm	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`11.3.5`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`7.18.3`	indirect
npm	lunr	`2.3.9`	indirect
npm	marked	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`9.0.4`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	minipass	`7.1.3`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	mute-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	neo-async	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	netmask	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	node-fetch	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	pac-proxy-agent	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	pac-resolver	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-scurry	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.2.5`	indirect
npm	prettier-plugin-organize-imports	`3.2.4`	indirect
npm	proxy-agent	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	reflect-metadata	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	run-async	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	rxjs	`7.8.2`	indirect
npm	shell-quote	`1.8.3`	indirect
npm	shiki	`0.14.7`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.8.7`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`8.0.5`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strtok3	`10.3.5`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	token-types	`6.1.2`	indirect
npm	tr46	`0.0.3`	indirect
npm	tree-kill	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.21.3`	indirect
npm	typedoc	`0.25.13`	indirect
npm	typedoc-plugin-markdown	`3.17.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.4.5`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.2`	indirect
npm	uglify-js	`3.17.4`	indirect
npm	uid	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	uint8array-extras	`1.5.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`5.26.5`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`6.21.0`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.11.0`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	uuid	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	vscode-oniguruma	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	vscode-textmate	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	wcwidth	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	whatwg-url	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	wordwrap	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyright	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`—`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 13

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 172 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 13 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
basic-ftp	`5.0.5`	indirect	critical	4	`5.3.1`
handlebars	`4.7.8`	indirect	critical	8	`4.7.9`
shell-quote	`1.8.3`	indirect	critical	2	`1.9.0`
axios	`1.15.0`	indirect	high	28	`1.18.0`
brace-expansion	`2.0.1`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`5.0.5`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
form-data	`4.0.5`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.6`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`9.0.4`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
uuid	`9.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`13.0.1`
follow-redirects	`1.15.11`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.16.0`
ip-address	`10.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`10.3.1`
yaml	`2.8.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.8.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records