Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 19:55 UTC

guidepup / guidepup-playwright

Screen reader automation library for Playwright testing.

TypeScriptMIT★ 84 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗

guidepup/guidepup-playwright holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (56/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GuidepupOrganization
26 followers22 public repossince Dec 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@guidepup/playwright0.19.1104,4073529 days agoplaywrightscreen-readeraccessibilitya11yvoiceovernvdaguidepup

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 19 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
14.4/18Commit volume39 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year39
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push19
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases35 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 29 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~69.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tag0.19.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release29
mean_days_between_releases69.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.1/60Stars84 stars
6.5/25Forks7 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars84
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
66.9/80Monthly downloads104,407 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@guidepup/playwright
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads104,407
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.98
How it's scored
29.4/42Issue resolution70% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance28/32 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs28
open_issues3
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.7
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.3/25Owner reach26 followers of guidepup
19.4/25Track record22 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers26
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginguidepup
public_repos22
account_age_days1,735

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history35 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@guidepup/playwright
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://guidepup.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics13 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsplaywright, voiceover, accessibility, accessibility-testing, accessibility-automation, screen-reader-api, a11y, a11y-testing, a11y-automation, a11y-api, playwright-a11y, nvda, screen-reader
has_wikino
homepagehttps://guidepup.dev
docs_sitehttps://guidepup.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories19
affected_packages5
assessed_packages193
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 193 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history83 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.892
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.js
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes13,185
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

84GitHub stars
3contributors
39commits, last 12 months
19days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
19Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712022-042024-032026-03
Major 0Minor 9Patch 10

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 19:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained28 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities17 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 193

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@cspotcode/source-map-support0.8.1indirect
npm@derhuerst/http-basic8.2.4indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.9.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc2.1.4indirect
npm@eslint/js8.57.1indirect
npm@gerrit0/mini-shiki3.23.0indirect
npm@guidepup/guidepup0.33.0indirect
npm@guidepup/record0.1.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/config-array0.13.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/object-schema2.0.3indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.14indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.9indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@playwright/test1.61.1indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types3.23.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@tsconfig/node101.0.9indirect
npm@tsconfig/node121.0.11indirect
npm@tsconfig/node141.0.3indirect
npm@tsconfig/node161.0.3indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/node10.17.60indirect
npm@types/node24.13.3indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/project-service8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/type-utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.65.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.65.0indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.3indirect
npm@xmldom/xmldom0.9.10indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn8.8.2indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmacorn-walk8.2.0indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmarg4.1.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.16indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.7indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcaseless0.12.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconcat-stream2.0.0indirect
npmcreate-require1.1.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.3.7indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdiff4.0.2indirect
npmdoctrine3.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint8.57.1indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-scope7.2.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree9.6.1indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.20.1indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmffmpeg-static5.2.0indirect
npmfile-entry-cache6.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache3.2.0indirect
npmflatted3.4.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmglob13.0.6indirect
npmglob7.2.3indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals13.24.0indirect
npmgraphemer1.4.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-response-object3.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmignore7.0.6indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-path-inside3.0.3indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmake-error1.3.6indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpackage-json-from-dist1.0.1indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-cache-control1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-scurry2.0.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.61.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.61.1indirect
npmplist4.0.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprogress2.0.3indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreadable-stream3.6.2indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.1.0indirect
npmrimraf3.0.2indirect
npmrimraf6.1.3indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.1.0indirect
npmstring_decoder1.3.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmts-api-utils2.5.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtype-fest0.20.2indirect
npmtypedarray0.0.6indirect
npmtypedoc0.28.20indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmv8-compile-cache-lib3.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmxmlbuilder15.1.1indirect
npmyaml2.9.0indirect
npmyn3.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 193 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@xmldom/xmldom0.9.10indirecthigh130.9.12
brace-expansion1.1.16indirecthigh25.0.9
brace-expansion5.0.7indirecthigh25.0.9
js-yaml4.3.1indirecthigh14.3.2
diff4.0.2indirectmoderate18.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.