Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-26 04:59 UTC

hanzo-fi / go-libs

Hanzo Finance — go-libs

GoNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

hanzo-fi/go-libs holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (22/100). It was last updated 32 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

hanzo-fiOrganization
0 followers10 public repossince Jul 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/hanzo-fi/go-libs/v5v5.6.2-332 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 32 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 115 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year115
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push32
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 32 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv2.2.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release32
mean_days_between_releases0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

22At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

45Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth — 9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.457

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

38Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of hanzo-fi
7.9/25Track record — 10 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginhanzo-fi
public_repos10
account_age_days51

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 32 days ago
12/20Version history — 3 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/hanzo-fi/go-libs/v5
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish32

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Nix, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesJustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/292 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes41,030
source_files_sampled292
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
9contributors
115commits, last 12 months
32days since last push
6releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-26 04:59 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities13 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 79
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/ClickHouse/ch-gov0.71.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go/v2v2.43.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/IBM/saramav1.46.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/ThreeDotsLabs/watermillv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/ThreeDotsLabs/watermill-awsv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/ThreeDotsLabs/watermill-http/v2v2.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/ThreeDotsLabs/watermill-kafka/v3v3.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/ThreeDotsLabs/watermill-nats/v2v2.1.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-msk-iam-sasl-signer-gov1.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.12go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/rds/authv1.6.20go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.97.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/snsv1.39.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sqsv1.42.24go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.24.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/getkin/kin-openapiv0.134.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-chi/chi/v5v5.2.5go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-jose/go-jose/v4v4.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.9.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/securecookiev1.1.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/invopop/jsonschemav0.13.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgerrcodev0.0.0-20250907135507-afb5586c32a6go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.9.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgxlistenv0.0.0-20250802141604-12b92425684cgo.mod
Gogithub.com/muhlemmer/guv0.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats-server/v2v2.12.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/nats-io/nats.gov1.49.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/olivere/elastic/v7v7.0.32go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2v2.28.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/onsi/gomegav1.39.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/ory/dockertest/v3v3.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/riandyrn/otelchiv0.12.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/uptrace/bunv1.2.18go.mod
Gogithub.com/uptrace/bun/dialect/pgdialectv1.2.18go.mod
Gogithub.com/uptrace/bun/extra/bundebugv1.2.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/uptrace/bun/extra/bunotelv1.2.18go.mod
Gogithub.com/uptrace/opentelemetry-go-extra/otellogrusv0.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/xdg-go/scramv1.2.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/xo/dburlv0.24.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/zitadel/oidc/v3v3.45.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/zitadel/schemav1.3.2go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/hostv0.66.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.66.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/runtimev0.66.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/propagators/b3v1.41.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetricgrpcv1.41.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpcv1.41.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdoutmetricv1.41.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttracev1.41.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0go.mod
Gogo.temporal.io/apiv1.62.5go.mod
Gogo.temporal.io/sdkv1.41.1go.mod
Gogo.temporal.io/sdk/contrib/opentelemetryv0.7.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/digv1.19.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/fxv1.24.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/mockv0.6.0go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/zapv1.27.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.39.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with hanzo-fi/go-libs. Read them side by side →

100stacklok/toolhiveToolHive is an enterprise-grade platform for running and managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.Exceptional100pingcap/tidbTiDB is built for agentic workloads that grow unpredictably, with ACID guarantees and native support for transactions, analytics, and vector search. No data silos. No noisy neighbors. No infrastructure ceiling.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100openfga/openfgaA high performance and flexible authorization/permission engine built for developers and inspired by Google ZanzibarExceptional100prometheus/prometheusThe Prometheus monitoring system and time series database.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.