Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-07 08:33 UTC

hanzoai / beego

Hanzo fork of beego v2 — prometheus/client_golang stripped, luxfi/metric backend (0 prom/grpc)

GoCustom license★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

hanzoai/beego holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Hanzo AIOrganization

38 followers323 public repossince Dec 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/hanzoai/beego/v2	v2.4.2	-	5	56 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

69Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 7 days ago
6.9/36	Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18	Commit volume — 62 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	62
human_commit_share	0.677
days_since_last_push	7
active_weeks_last_year	10

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 6 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 56 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	6
latest_release_tag	v1.12.13
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	56
mean_days_between_releases	10

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	0
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

72Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, goreportcard.com, pkg.go.dev
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.909

Issue & PR responsiveness

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
23.6/30	PR acceptance — 22/28 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	22
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
11.4/25	Owner reach — 38 followers of hanzoai
25/25	Track record — 323 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	38
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	hanzoai
public_repos	323
account_age_days	3,923

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 56 days ago
20/20	Version history — 5 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/hanzoai/beego/v2
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	56

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

30At Risk

Jurisdiction risk alert

High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected

1 contributor organization profilesRussia

Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.

How jurisdiction exposure is assessed

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	4
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap	34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier	75
security_posture_after_multiplier	30
security_posture_before_jurisdiction	40

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 75% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

65Good

How it's scored

8.9/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.81.1 (critical 9.1), golang.org/x/crypto v0.53.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	12
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	80
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, unknown 5
direct_affected_packages	2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 80 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 42 of 42 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

84Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, test/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
6.5/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 62 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 20 of the last 62 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, test/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.032
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.323

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.8/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/361 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	82,587
source_files_sampled	361
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

0GitHub stars

2contributors

62commits, last 12 months

7days since last push

6releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-07 08:32 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 31 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 36

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/beego/x2j	`v0.0.0-20131220205130-a0352aadc542`	go.mod
Go	github.com/bits-and-blooms/bloom/v3	`v3.7.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/bradfitz/gomemcache	`v0.0.0-20190913173617-a41fca850d0b`	go.mod
Go	github.com/casbin/casbin	`v1.9.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/cloudflare/golz4	`v0.0.0-20150217214814-ef862a3cdc58`	go.mod
Go	github.com/couchbase/go-couchbase	`v0.1.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch/v6	`v6.8.10`	go.mod
Go	github.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfs	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-kit/kit	`v0.13.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-kit/log	`v0.2.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gogo/protobuf	`v1.3.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hanzokv/go/v9	`v9.22.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru	`v1.0.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ledisdb/ledisdb	`v0.0.0-20200510135210-d35789ec47e6`	go.mod
Go	github.com/lib/pq	`v1.12.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/luxfi/metric	`v1.5.8`	go.mod
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go	`v1.2.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml	`v1.9.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/shiena/ansicolor	`v0.0.0-20200904210342-c7312218db18`	go.mod
Go	github.com/ssdb/gossdb	`v0.0.0-20180723034631-88f6b59b84ec`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	go.mod
Go	go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3	`v3.6.12`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.21.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.81.1`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hanzoai/csqlite	`v0.1.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 36 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/beego/x2j	`v0.0.0-20131220205130-a0352aadc542`	direct
Go	github.com/bits-and-blooms/bloom/v3	`v3.7.1`	direct
Go	github.com/bradfitz/gomemcache	`v0.0.0-20190913173617-a41fca850d0b`	direct
Go	github.com/casbin/casbin	`v1.9.1`	direct
Go	github.com/cloudflare/golz4	`v0.0.0-20150217214814-ef862a3cdc58`	direct
Go	github.com/couchbase/go-couchbase	`v0.1.1`	direct
Go	github.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch/v6	`v6.8.10`	direct
Go	github.com/elazarl/go-bindata-assetfs	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/go-kit/kit	`v0.13.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-kit/log	`v0.2.1`	direct
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.10.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gogo/protobuf	`v1.3.2`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hanzoai/csqlite	`v0.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hanzokv/go/v9	`v9.22.0`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru	`v1.0.2`	direct
Go	github.com/ledisdb/ledisdb	`v0.0.0-20200510135210-d35789ec47e6`	direct
Go	github.com/lib/pq	`v1.12.3`	direct
Go	github.com/luxfi/metric	`v1.5.8`	direct
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/opentracing/opentracing-go	`v1.2.0`	direct
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml	`v1.9.5`	direct
Go	github.com/shiena/ansicolor	`v0.0.0-20200904210342-c7312218db18`	direct
Go	github.com/ssdb/gossdb	`v0.0.0-20180723034631-88f6b59b84ec`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`v1.0.0`	direct
Go	go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3	`v3.6.12`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/stdout/stdouttrace	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`v1.44.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.21.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.81.1`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	filippo.io/edwards25519	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bits-and-blooms/bitset	`v1.24.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/cenkalti/backoff	`v2.2.1+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/coreos/go-semver	`v0.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22	`v22.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/couchbase/gomemcached	`v0.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/couchbase/goutils	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cupcake/rdb	`v0.0.0-20161107195141-43ba34106c76`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc`	indirect
Go	github.com/dgryski/go-rendezvous	`v0.0.0-20200823014737-9f7001d12a5f`	indirect
Go	github.com/edsrzf/mmap-go	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logfmt/logfmt	`v0.5.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`v1.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`v1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`v1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/snappy	`v0.0.0-20180518054509-2e65f85255db`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/rpc	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/grandcat/zeroconf	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2	`v2.26.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/knetic/govaluate	`v3.0.1-0.20171022003610-9aa49832a739+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/luxfi/mdns	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/luxfi/pq	`v1.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/luxfi/zap	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/miekg/dns	`v1.1.62`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`v0.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2`	indirect
Go	github.com/siddontang/go	`v0.0.0-20170517070808-cb568a3e5cc0`	indirect
Go	github.com/siddontang/rdb	`v0.0.0-20150307021120-fc89ed2e418d`	indirect
Go	github.com/syndtr/goleveldb	`v0.0.0-20160425020131-cfa635847112`	indirect
Go	go.etcd.io/etcd/api/v3	`v3.6.12`	indirect
Go	go.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3	`v3.6.12`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk	`v1.2.1`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`v1.44.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/multierr	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/zap	`v1.27.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.36.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.46.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.45.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api	`v0.0.0-20260226221140-a57be14db171`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20260226221140-a57be14db171`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 80 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.81.1`	direct	critical	3	`1.83.1`
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.53.0`	direct	unknown	4	`0.56.0`
go.etcd.io/etcd/client/pkg/v3	`v3.6.12`	indirect	unknown	1	`3.7.1`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.36.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.55.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.38.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records