Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 15:36 UTC

harumiWeb / tree-sitter-vba

Tree-sitter grammar for Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) and VB6.

JavaScriptMIT★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

harumiWeb/tree-sitter-vba holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (30/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

harumiPersonal account
17 followers18 public repossince Mar 2024

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume132 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year132
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases22 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv0.14.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases5.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

30At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars2 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
40/80Monthly downloads1,002 downloads/month across go, npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/harumiWeb/tree-sitter-vba, tree-sitter-vba
dependents
ecosystemsgo, npm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads1,002
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.977
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance39/39 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs39
open_issues0
closed_issues23
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
9/25Owner reach17 followers of harumiWeb
14.3/25Track record18 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginharumiWeb
public_repos18
account_age_days914
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on go, npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history22 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/harumiWeb/tree-sitter-vba, tree-sitter-vba
ecosystemsgo, npm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://harumiweb.github.io/tree-sitter-vba/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsexcel, grammar, lsp, parser, syntax-highlighting, tree-sitter, vba, visual-basic, vb6
has_wikino
homepagehttps://harumiweb.github.io/tree-sitter-vba/
docs_sitehttps://harumiweb.github.io/tree-sitter-vba/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
4.5/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:tree-sitter-vba@0.14.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
36.3/40Legible commit history68 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.68
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,800
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapgo.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
52.8/55Manageable file sizes2/49 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes46,356,530
source_files_sampled49
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
2contributors
132commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
22releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 15:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitterv0.24.0go.mod
npmnode-addon-api^8.8.0package.json
npmnode-gyp-build^4.8.4package.json
All dependencies 69

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 66 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/tree-sitter/go-tree-sitterv0.24.0direct
npmnode-addon-api8.8.0direct
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-pointerv0.0.1indirect
npm@codemirror/commands6.10.4indirect
npm@codemirror/language6.12.4indirect
npm@codemirror/state6.7.1indirect
npm@codemirror/view6.43.7indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@lezer/common1.5.2indirect
npm@lezer/highlight1.2.3indirect
npm@lezer/lr1.4.10indirect
npm@marijn/find-cluster-break1.0.3indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm-eabi0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-android-arm640.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-arm640.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-darwin-x640.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-freebsd-x640.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-riscv64-musl0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-s390x-gnu0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-linux-x64-musl0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-openharmony-arm640.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-arm64-msvc0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-ia32-msvc0.54.0indirect
npm@oxfmt/binding-win32-x64-msvc0.54.0indirect
npmcrelt1.0.7indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmoxfmt0.54.0indirect
npmplaywright1.62.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.62.1indirect
npmstyle-mod4.1.3indirect
npmtinypool2.1.0indirect
npmtree-sitter0.25.0indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.26.9indirect
npmw3c-keyname2.2.8indirect
npmweb-tree-sitter0.26.9indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:tree-sitter-vba@0.14.1 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo, npm.