Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-23 10:57 UTC

hashicorp / terraform-plugin-framework-timeouts

Convenience functions and types for timeouts, for use with terraform-plugin-framework

GoMPL-2.0★ 11 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-timeouts holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (55/100). It was last updated 22 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HashiCorpOrganization · verified domain
10,904 followers943 public repossince May 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-timeoutsv0.7.0-9335 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 22 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence29/52 weeks with commits
14.5/18Commit volume40 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year40
human_commit_share0.24
days_since_last_push22
active_weeks_last_year29
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases9 releases published
16.2/36Release recencylatest release 335 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~140.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tagv0.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release335
mean_days_between_releases140.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
16.2/60Stars11 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
2.7/15Watchers4 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars11
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicespkg.go.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.441
How it's scored
36/42Issue resolution86% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance208/230 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs208
open_issues2
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.857
closed_unmerged_prs22
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach10,904 followers of hashicorp
25/25Track record943 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers10,904
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginhashicorp
public_repos943
account_age_days5,624
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
26/35Publish recencylatest publish 335 days ago
20/20Version history9 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-timeouts
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish335

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages3
assessed_packages55
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 55 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.1/40Legible commit history14 of 24 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.583
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance59 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod, tools/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.59
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes13,749
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

11GitHub stars
13contributors
40commits, last 12 months
22days since last push
9releases
2bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1223344412023-022024-092026-03
Major 0Minor 4Patch 2

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-23 10:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained6 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/copywritev0.25.3tools/go.mod
All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 50 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/copywritev0.25.3direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-frameworkv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-gov0.31.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-logv0.11.0direct
Gogithub.com/alecaivazis/survey/v2v2.3.7indirect
Gogithub.com/bmatcuk/doublestar/v4v4.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bradleyfalzon/ghinstallation/v2v2.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cli/go-gh/v2v2.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cli/safeexecv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.18.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4v4.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v45v45.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v84v84.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystringv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-hclogv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jedib0t/go-pretty/v6v6.7.9indirect
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquotev0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51indirect
Gogithub.com/knadh/koanfv1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/knadh/koanf/v2v2.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.13indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.14indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.16indirect
Gogithub.com/mergestat/timediffv0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mgutz/ansiv0.0.0-20200706080929-d51e80ef957dindirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/copystructurev1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/reflectwalkv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/thanhpk/randstrv1.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.39.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 55 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/sysv0.39.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.