Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 08:43 UTC

henrikwidlund / net-dns

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Aug 2025View on GitHub ↗

henrikwidlund/net-dns holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Henrik WidlundPersonal account
7 followers47 public repossince Jun 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetTheodicean.Makaretu.Dns0.0.11-110 days agodns
NuGetTheodicean.Makaretu.Dns.Multicast0.0.11-110 days agomulticastmdnsdnszeroconf

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 378 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year378
human_commit_share0.42
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year48
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~29.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv0.0.11
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases29.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.1/80Total downloads — 82,473 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesTheodicean.Makaretu.Dns, Theodicean.Makaretu.Dns.Multicast
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads82,473
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.977
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
21.4/30PR acceptance — 176/247 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs176
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs71
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of henrikwidlund
24.2/25Track record — 47 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginhenrikwidlund
public_repos47
account_age_days4,803
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesTheodicean.Makaretu.Dns, Theodicean.Makaretu.Dns.Multicast
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.6

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages26
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 26 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24.1/40Legible commit history — 19 of 42 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.452
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Dns/Dns.csproj, src/Mdns/Mdns.csproj, tests/Dns.Tests/Dns.Tests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 58 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackages.lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/Dns/Dns.csproj, src/Mdns/Mdns.csproj, tests/Dns.Tests/Dns.Tests.csproj, tests/Mdns.Tests/Mdns.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.58
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/145 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes26,125
source_files_sampled145
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
378commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 08:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 1/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool detected
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzer3.0.123src/Dns/Dns.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301src/Dns/Dns.csproj
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzer3.0.123src/Mdns/Mdns.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10src/Mdns/Mdns.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301src/Mdns/Mdns.csproj
All dependencies 26

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMeziantou.Analyzer3.0.123direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.10direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub10.0.301direct
NuGetCastle.Core5.1.1indirect
NuGetEnumerableAsyncProcessor3.8.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.ApplicationInsights2.23.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Tasks.Git10.0.301indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.DiaSymReader2.2.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyModel10.0.8indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.ILLink.Tasks10.0.10indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.Common10.0.301indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage18.9.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.Telemetry2.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport2.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport.Abstractions2.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform2.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild2.3.2indirect
NuGetMoq4.20.72indirect
NuGetSimpleBase5.6.2indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.EventLog6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing10.0.10indirect
NuGetTUnit1.61.15indirect
NuGetTUnit.Assertions1.61.15indirect
NuGetTUnit.Core1.61.15indirect
NuGetTUnit.Engine1.61.15indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 26 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.