Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 01:09 UTC

hibare / Moni

Application to monitor HTTP services

Python · Vue · TypeScriptMIT★ 1 star⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

hibare/Moni holds a health index of 48 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Shubham HibarePersonal account

15 followers43 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
PyPI	Moni	0.1.1	-	1	511 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 12 days ago
25.6/36	Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 106 commits in the last year
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

commits_last_year	106
human_commit_share	0.16
days_since_last_push	12
active_weeks_last_year	37

Release discipline

60Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 22 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 1,649 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	22
latest_release_tag	v0.7.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1,649
mean_days_between_releases	10.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 1 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	1
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.998

Issue & PR responsiveness

69Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
17.9/30	PR acceptance — 508/853 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	508
open_issues	0
closed_issues	21
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	345
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

53Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8.7/25	Owner reach — 15 followers of hibare
24/25	Track record — 43 public repos, account ~10 yr old

Inputs used

followers	15
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	hibare
public_repos	43
account_age_days	3,704

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

63Moderate

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 511 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	Moni
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	511

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

76Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	django, monitor, health-check
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
6/7.5	Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5	Packaging — no data
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	6.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

35Weak

How it's scored

3.5/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 8 affected: django 3.0.7 (critical 9.8), sqlparse 0.3.0 (high 7.5), sqlparse 0.5.5 (high 7.5), +5 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
22.4/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,203 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	115
affected_packages	16
assessed_packages	310
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 9, moderate 6
direct_affected_packages	8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 310 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 83 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	frontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.83

Code legibility for models

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/110 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	7,740
source_files_sampled	110
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

1GitHub stars

2contributors

106commits, last 12 months

12days since last push

22releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
pypi download statistics for 'Moni' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10

6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 01:08 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0	Contributors	project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
8	Maintained	10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	19 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 37

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	apscheduler	`==3.11.3`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	asgiref	`==3.11.1`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`==4.15.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	dj-database-url	`==3.1.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	django	`==6.0.6`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	django-apscheduler	`==0.7.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	django-filter	`==25.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	django-model-utils	`==5.0.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	djangorestframework	`==3.17.1`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	djangorestframework-simplejwt	`==5.5.1`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	drf-writable-nested	`==0.7.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	gunicorn	`==26.0.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	markdown	`==3.10.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	packaging	`==26.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`==2.9.12`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-decouple	`==3.8`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytz	`==2026.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pytz-deprecation-shim	`==0.1.0.post0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`==6.0.3`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.34.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	six	`==1.17.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	soupsieve	`==2.8.4`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	sqlparse	`==0.5.5`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`==4.15.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	tzdata	`==2026.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	tzlocal	`==5.4.4`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	urllib3	`==2.7.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	whitenoise	`==6.12.0`	backend/pyproject.toml
npm	@quasar/extras	`^1.18.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	@types/lodash.clonedeep	`^4.5.9`	frontend/package.json
npm	axios	`^1.18.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`^4.5.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	pinia	`^3.0.4`	frontend/package.json
npm	pinia-plugin-persistedstate	`^4.7.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	quasar	`^2.21.0`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue	`^3.5.39`	frontend/package.json
npm	vue-router	`^5.1.0`	frontend/package.json

All dependencies 310

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 48 direct and 262 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@quasar/extras	`1.18.0`	direct
npm	@types/lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.9`	direct
npm	axios	`1.18.1`	direct
npm	lodash.clonedeep	`4.5.0`	direct
npm	pinia	`3.0.4`	direct
npm	pinia-plugin-persistedstate	`4.7.1`	direct
npm	quasar	`2.21.0`	direct
npm	vue	`3.5.39`	direct
npm	vue-router	`5.1.0`	direct
PyPI	apscheduler	`3.11.3`	direct
PyPI	asgiref	`3.11.1`	direct
PyPI	asgiref	`3.2.3`	direct
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	dj-database-url	`0.5.0`	direct
PyPI	dj-database-url	`3.1.2`	direct
PyPI	django	`3.0.7`	direct
PyPI	django	`6.0.6`	direct
PyPI	django-apscheduler	`0.7.0`	direct
PyPI	django-filter	`25.2`	direct
PyPI	django-model-utils	`5.0.0`	direct
PyPI	djangorestframework	`3.17.1`	direct
PyPI	djangorestframework-simplejwt	`5.5.1`	direct
PyPI	drf-writable-nested	`0.7.2`	direct
PyPI	gunicorn	`26.0.0`	direct
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.2`	direct
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	direct
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`2.8.4`	direct
PyPI	psycopg2-binary	`2.9.12`	direct
PyPI	python-decouple	`3.3`	direct
PyPI	python-decouple	`3.8`	direct
PyPI	pytz	`2019.3`	direct
PyPI	pytz	`2026.2`	direct
PyPI	pytz-deprecation-shim	`0.1.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.23.0`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	six	`1.14.0`	direct
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	direct
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	direct
PyPI	sqlparse	`0.3.0`	direct
PyPI	sqlparse	`0.5.5`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.2`	direct
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.4.4`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`1.25.8`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	whitenoise	`5.0.1`	direct
PyPI	whitenoise	`6.12.0`	direct
npm	@babel/generator	`8.0.0-rc.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`8.0.0-rc.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`8.0.0-rc.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`8.0.0-rc.5`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`8.0.0-rc.5`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	@nuxt/kit	`3.17.3`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.138.0`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-android-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-arm64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-ia32	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-x64	`2.5.6`	indirect
npm	@quasar/vite-plugin	`1.12.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/jsesc	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@types/lodash	`4.14.195`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-vue	`6.0.7`	indirect
npm	@volar/language-core	`2.4.28`	indirect
npm	@volar/source-map	`2.4.28`	indirect
npm	@volar/typescript	`2.4.28`	indirect
npm	@vue-macros/common	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-core	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-dom	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-sfc	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/compiler-ssr	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`7.7.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-api	`8.1.2`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`7.7.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-kit	`8.1.2`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`7.7.8`	indirect
npm	@vue/devtools-shared	`8.1.2`	indirect
npm	@vue/language-core	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	@vue/reactivity	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-core	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/runtime-dom	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/server-renderer	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	@vue/shared	`3.5.39`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	alien-signals	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	ast-kit	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	ast-walker-scope	`0.9.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	birpc	`2.8.0`	indirect
npm	c12	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	citty	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.1.8`	indirect
npm	confbox	`0.2.2`	indirect
npm	consola	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	copy-anything	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	defu	`6.1.7`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	destr	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`16.5.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	entities	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	errx	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	es-set-tostringtag	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.27.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	estree-walker	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	exsolve	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	follow-redirects	`1.16.0`	indirect
npm	form-data	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	giget	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	hookable	`5.5.3`	indirect
npm	https-proxy-agent	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ignore	`7.0.4`	indirect
npm	immutable	`5.1.5`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-what	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`9.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	klona	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	knitwork	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	local-pkg	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	magic-string-ast	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	mitt	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	mlly	`1.8.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	muggle-string	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.15`	indirect
npm	node-addon-api	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	node-fetch-native	`1.6.6`	indirect
npm	nypm	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	ohash	`2.0.11`	indirect
npm	path-browserify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	pathe	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	perfect-debounce	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	pkg-types	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.16`	indirect
npm	proxy-from-env	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	quansync	`0.2.11`	indirect
npm	rc9	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	rfdc	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.101.0`	indirect
npm	scule	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.2`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	speakingurl	`14.0.1`	indirect
npm	std-env	`3.9.0`	indirect
npm	strip-literal	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	superjson	`2.2.5`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	ufo	`1.6.4`	indirect
npm	unctx	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	unimport	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	unplugin	`2.3.11`	indirect
npm	unplugin	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	unplugin-utils	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	unplugin-utils	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	untyped	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.1.3`	indirect
npm	vscode-uri	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	vue-tsc	`3.3.6`	indirect
npm	webpack-virtual-modules	`0.6.2`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	amqp	`2.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	autopep8	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	billiard	`3.6.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	celery	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2019.11.28`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2025.4.26`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`3.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	django-celery-beat	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	django-celerybeat-status	`0.0.10`	indirect
PyPI	django-timezone-field	`4.0`	indirect
PyPI	honcho	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`2.8`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.10`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	kombu	`4.6.8`	indirect
PyPI	moni	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycodestyle	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-crontab	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`3.3.11`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	uritemplate	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	vine	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.47.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`2.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 310 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 8 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
django	`3.0.7`	direct	critical	29	`6.0.8`
sqlparse	`0.3.0`	direct	high	15	`0.6.0`
sqlparse	`0.5.5`	direct	high	10	`0.6.0`
urllib3	`1.25.8`	direct	high	20	`2.7.0`
celery	`4.4.1`	indirect	high	2	`5.2.2`
certifi	`2019.11.28`	indirect	high	5	`2024.7.4`
idna	`2.8`	indirect	high	4	`3.15`
immutable	`5.1.5`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.8`
nanoid	`3.3.15`	indirect	high	2	`5.1.16`
postcss	`8.5.16`	indirect	high	2	`8.5.23`
django	`6.0.6`	direct	moderate	7	`6.0.8`
djangorestframework	`3.17.1`	direct	moderate	4	`3.17.2`
quasar	`2.21.0`	direct	moderate	1	`2.22.0`
requests	`2.23.0`	direct	moderate	8	`2.33.0`
idna	`3.10`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
zipp	`2.1.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.19.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records