Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 11:03 UTC

honojs / hono

Web framework built on Web Standards

TypeScriptMIT★ 32,206 stars⑂ 1,314 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗

#cloudflare #web-framework #cloudflare-workers #npm #router #deno #bun #aws-lambda #typescript

honojs/hono holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HonoOrganization · verified domain

3,324 followers16 public repossince Jan 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	hono	4.13.8	217,131,876	450	1 day ago	hono web app http application framework router cloudflare workers fastly compute deno bun lambda nodejs

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

98Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
33.9/36	Commit cadence — 49/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 414 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	414
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	49

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~4.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v4.13.8
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1
mean_days_between_releases	4.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

96Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 32,206 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,314 forks
10.9/15	Watchers — 92 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,314
stars	32,206
watchers	92
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	10
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 217,131,876 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	hono
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	217,131,876
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 56 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.68

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good

How it's scored

35.7/42	Issue resolution — 85% of issues closed
23.6/30	PR acceptance — 2,067/2,633 decided PRs merged
3.2/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 4/16 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

merged_prs	2,067
open_issues	270
closed_issues	1,543
prs_merged_7d	8
prs_decided_7d	26
prs_merged_30d	19
prs_decided_30d	60
issue_closed_ratio	0.851
closed_unmerged_prs	566
first_time_authors_30d	9
first_time_prs_merged_30d	4
first_time_prs_decided_30d	16

Ownership & stewardship

93Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 3,324 followers of honojs
18.2/25	Track record — 16 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	3,324
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	honojs
public_repos	16
account_age_days	1,693

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 450 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	hono
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://hono.dev
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 9 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cloudflare, web-framework, cloudflare-workers, npm, router, deno, bun, aws-lambda, typescript
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://hono.dev
docs_site	https://hono.dev
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

55Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 56 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 132 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	54
affected_packages	6
assessed_packages	120
unassessed_packages	30
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 2, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 120 resolved dependencies against OSV. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://hono.dev/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 84 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://hono.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.84
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

65Good

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11	Static type checking — benchmarks/fetch/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/jsx/src/react-jsx/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/jsx/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/routers/tsconfig.json, perf-measures/type-check/scripts/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/bun/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/fastly/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/lambda-edge/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/lambda/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/node/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/workerd/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	bun.lockb, package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	benchmarks/fetch/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/jsx/src/react-jsx/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/jsx/tsconfig.json, benchmarks/routers/tsconfig.json, perf-measures/type-check/scripts/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/bun/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/fastly/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/lambda-edge/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/lambda/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/node/tsconfig.json, runtime-tests/workerd/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.2/55	Manageable file sizes — 5/360 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	TypeScript
largest_source_bytes	128,380
source_files_sampled	360
oversized_source_files	5

Key facts

32,206GitHub stars

99contributors

414commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

270open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 41 authors (cap 12)
deps.dev does not index npm:hono@4.13.8; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,314 ⇿

0Stars

1,314Forks

99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 6Patch 93

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10

5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 11:02 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	21 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6	Code-Review	Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10	Contributors	project has 56 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0	Vulnerabilities	132 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@esbuild-kit/cjs-loader	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild-kit/core-utils	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@esbuild-kit/esm-loader	`2.5.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	@hono/eslint-config	`^2.1.1`	indirect
npm	@hono/node-server	`^2.0.12`	indirect
npm	@medley/router	`^0.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/benchmark	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@types/jsdom	`^21.1.7`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^24.3.0`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`^26.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/prop-types	`15.7.5`	indirect
npm	@types/qs	`6.9.17`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`18.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`18.2.40`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`18.2.17`	indirect
npm	@types/scheduler	`0.16.2`	indirect
npm	@types/ws	`^8.18.1`	indirect
npm	@typescript/native-preview	`7.0.0-dev.20260210.1`	indirect
npm	@vitest/coverage-v8	`^4.1.7`	indirect
npm	benchmark	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	boolbase	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	buffer-from	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	bun-types	`^1.2.20`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	css-select	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	css-what	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	css.escape	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	define-data-property	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	dom-serializer	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	domelementtype	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	domhandler	`5.0.3`	indirect
npm	domutils	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	editorconfig-checker	`6.2.0`	indirect
npm	entities	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.17.14`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.19.8`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`^0.27.1`	indirect
npm	eslint	`^9.39.3`	indirect
npm	express	`^5.2.1`	indirect
npm	fast-decode-uri-component	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	fast-querystring	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	find-my-way	`^9.6.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	get-tsconfig	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	happy-dom	`12.10.3`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	has-proto	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	he	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	hono	`3.10.4`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsdom	`22.1.0`	indirect
npm	koa-router	`^14.0.0`	indirect
npm	koa-tree-router	`^0.13.1`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	loose-envify	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	memoirist	`^1.1.0`	indirect
npm	mitata	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	mitata	`^0.1.11`	indirect
npm	mitata	`^1.0.34`	indirect
npm	msw	`^2.6.0`	indirect
npm	nano-jsx	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	node-html-parser	`6.1.11`	indirect
npm	np	`11.2.1`	indirect
npm	nth-check	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.3`	indirect
npm	oxc-parser	`^0.96.0`	indirect
npm	pkg-pr-new	`^0.0.53`	indirect
npm	platform	`1.3.6`	indirect
npm	preact	`10.19.2`	indirect
npm	preact-render-to-string	`6.3.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.7.4`	indirect
npm	pretty-format	`3.8.0`	indirect
npm	publint	`0.3.15`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.13.0`	indirect
npm	radix3	`^1.1.2`	indirect
npm	react	`18.2.0`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`18.2.0`	indirect
npm	rou3	`^0.9.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.23.0`	indirect
npm	set-function-length	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-support	`0.5.21`	indirect
npm	trek-router	`^1.2.0`	indirect
npm	tsx	`3.12.6`	indirect
npm	tsx	`^4.20.5`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`^6.0.3`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-fastly-js-compute	`^0.4.2`	indirect
npm	vitest	`^4.1.9`	indirect
npm	webidl-conversions	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-encoding	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	whatwg-mimetype	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	wrangler	`4.107.0`	indirect
npm	ws	`^8.21.0`	indirect
npm	zod	`^3.23.8`	indirect

Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 120 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
happy-dom	`12.10.3`	indirect	critical	3	`20.8.9`
hono	`3.10.4`	indirect	high	42	`4.13.5`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
esbuild	`0.17.14`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
esbuild	`0.19.8`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
qs	`6.13.0`	indirect	moderate	4	`6.16.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records