Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-29 16:18 UTC

hotgluexyz / HotglueSingerSDK

PythonApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2025forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

hotgluexyz/HotglueSingerSDK holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (29/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

hotglueOrganization
53 followers345 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIhotglue-singer-sdk1.0.5169,016510 days agohotgluehotglue-sdkelt

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
17.1/18Commit volume — 80 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year80
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv1.0.51
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

29At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
64.5/80Monthly downloads — 69,016 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshotglue-singer-sdk
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads69,016
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 51 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled51
top_contributor_share0.347
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.2/30PR acceptance — 70/72 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs70
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d10
prs_decided_30d10
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.5/25Owner reach — 53 followers of hotgluexyz
25/25Track record — 345 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers53
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginhotgluexyz
public_repos345
account_age_days2,324

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 51 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshotglue-singer-sdk
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort]), ruff.toml, tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

15Critical
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://hotglue.com
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepagehttps://hotglue.com
docs_sitehttps://hotglue.com
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6.7/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: click 8.1.8 (high 7.2), cryptography 37.0.4 (high 8.2), pyjwt 2.8.0 (high 7.5), +3 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
19.9/40No advisories left outstanding — 6 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,746 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories76
affected_packages14
assessed_packages87
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 5, moderate 6, low 1
direct_affected_packages6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 87 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 75 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.806
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort]), ruff.toml, tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — hotglue_singer_sdk/py.typed, mypy.ini
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnoxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configshotglue_singer_sdk/py.typed, mypy.ini
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.07
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (hotglue_singer_sdk/py.typed, mypy.ini)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/121 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes56,233
source_files_sampled121
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
51contributors
80commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
41releases
2bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • deps.dev does not index pypi:hotglue-singer-sdk@1.0.51; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-29 16:17 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained18 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities46 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpipelinewise-singer-python1.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbackoff>=1.8.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpendulum—pyproject.toml
PyPIclick~=8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT~=2.4pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests^2.25.1pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography>=3.4.6pyproject.toml
PyPIcffi—pyproject.toml
PyPIimportlib-metadata*pyproject.toml
PyPImemoization>=0.3.2,<0.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIjsonpath-ng^1.5.3pyproject.toml
PyPIjoblib—pyproject.toml
PyPIinflection^0.5.1pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy^1.4pyproject.toml
PyPIgreenlet>=3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv^0.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions^4.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic—pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas—pyproject.toml
PyPIhotglue-etl-exceptions0.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIisodate0.7.2pyproject.toml
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 65 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbackoff1.8.0direct
PyPIcffi1.15.1direct
PyPIclick8.1.8direct
PyPIcryptography37.0.4direct
PyPIgreenlet3.1.1direct
PyPIhotglue-etl-exceptions0.1.0direct
PyPIimportlib-metadata4.13.0direct
PyPIinflection0.5.1direct
PyPIisodate0.7.2direct
PyPIjoblib1.3.2direct
PyPIjsonpath-ng1.8.0direct
PyPImemoization0.4.0direct
PyPInumpy1.21.6direct
PyPIpandas1.3.5direct
PyPIpendulum2.1.2direct
PyPIpipelinewise-singer-python1.2.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.5.3direct
PyPIpyjwt2.8.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv0.20.0direct
PyPIrequests2.31.0direct
PyPIsqlalchemy1.4.54direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.7.1direct
PyPIannotated-types0.5.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.2.3indirect
PyPIattrs24.2.0indirect
PyPIbinaryornot0.4.4indirect
PyPIblack22.12.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIciso86012.3.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcookiecutter2.6.0indirect
PyPIcoverage6.5.0indirect
PyPIdarglint1.8.1indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIflake83.9.2indirect
PyPIflake8-annotations2.9.1indirect
PyPIflake8-docstrings1.7.0indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.5.1indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema3.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py2.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImccabe0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImypy0.971indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPIobjprint0.2.3indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIpathspec0.11.2indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.0.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow9.0.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.7.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.21indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.14.6indirect
PyPIpydocstyle6.3.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes2.3.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.17.2indirect
PyPIpyrsistent0.19.3indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.4indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-slugify8.0.4indirect
PyPIpytz2020.5indirect
PyPIpytzdata2020.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIrequests-mock1.12.1indirect
PyPIrich13.8.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools68.0.0indirect
PyPIsimplejson3.11.1indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2-stubs0.0.2a38indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItomli2.0.1indirect
PyPItyped-ast1.5.5indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.8.19.14indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.31.0.20231231indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.0.7indirect
PyPIviztracer0.15.6indirect
PyPIxdoctest1.1.6indirect
PyPIzipp3.15.0indirect
Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 87 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
black22.12.0indirectcritical426.3.1
pyarrow9.0.0indirectcritical317.0.0
click8.1.8directhigh18.3.3
cryptography37.0.4directhigh22300.0.12
pyjwt2.8.0directhigh112.13.0
setuptools68.0.0indirecthigh683.0.0
urllib32.0.7indirecthigh122.7.0
numpy1.21.6directmoderate11.22
python-dotenv0.20.0directmoderate21.2.2
requests2.31.0directmoderate62.33.0
idna3.10indirectmoderate23.15
pytest7.4.4indirectmoderate29.0.3
zipp3.15.0indirectmoderate23.19.1
pygments2.17.2indirectlow22.20.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.