Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 09:26 UTC

houseme / qrcode-rs

QR code encoder in Rust,Generate QR Code matrices and images in RAW, PNG and SVG formats.

RustApache-2.0★ 21 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

houseme/qrcode-rs holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (50/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HauserPersonal account
251 followers135 public repossince Jun 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioqrcode-rs2.2.014,1232415 days agoimageqrcodeencoderbarcodegenerateencoding

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 302 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year302
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

98Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.9 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases18.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
21.1/60Stars — 21 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars21
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.3/80Monthly downloads — 14,123 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesqrcode-rs
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads81,049
monthly_downloads14,123
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
18.9/30PR acceptance — 17/27 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs17
open_issues0
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.3/25Owner reach — 251 followers of houseme
25/25Track record — 135 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers251
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginhouseme
public_repos135
account_age_days4,864
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 24 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesqrcode-rs
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://houseme.github.io/qrcode-rs/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsencoder, encoder-decoder, qrcode, qrcode-generator, rust, rust-lang, rust-library
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://houseme.github.io/qrcode-rs/
docs_sitehttps://houseme.github.io/qrcode-rs/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages210
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 210 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

71Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-compat/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/qrcode-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-compat/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-core/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-decode/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-eps/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-html/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-image/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-parse/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-pdf/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-pic/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-render/Cargo.toml, crates/qrcode-svg/Cargo.toml, fuzz/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.7/55Manageable file sizes — 4/174 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes154,556
source_files_sampled174
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

21GitHub stars
1contributors
302commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 09:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
8Signed-Releases2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioimage—Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—Cargo.toml
crates.iolog—Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon—Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate2—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-core—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-decode—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-eps—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-html—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-image—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-pdf—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-pic—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-parse—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-render—Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrcode-svg—Cargo.toml
All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 202 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioclap4.6.7direct
crates.ioflate21.1.10direct
crates.ioimage0.25.10direct
crates.iolog0.4.34direct
crates.iorayon1.12.0direct
crates.ioserde1.0.229direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.154direct
crates.iotokio1.53.3direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioaligned0.4.3indirect
crates.ioaligned-vec0.6.4indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.104indirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.4.2indirect
crates.ioarbitrary1.5.0indirect
crates.ioarg_enum_proc_macro0.3.4indirect
crates.ioarrayvec0.7.8indirect
crates.ioas-slice0.2.1indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.ioav-scenechange0.14.1indirect
crates.ioav1-grain0.2.5indirect
crates.ioavif-serialize0.8.9indirect
crates.iobit-set0.11.1indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.10.1indirect
crates.iobit_field0.10.3indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.2indirect
crates.iobitstream-io4.10.0indirect
crates.ioborsh1.8.1indirect
crates.ioborsh-derive1.8.1indirect
crates.iobuilt0.8.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobytemuck1.25.2indirect
crates.iobyteorder-lite0.1.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocc1.8.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.5indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.2.2indirect
crates.iochacha200.10.2indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.7indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.1indirect
crates.iocolor_quant1.1.0indirect
crates.iocore_detect1.0.0indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.1indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.1indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.2indirect
crates.iocriterion0.8.2indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.8indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.21indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.23indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioeither1.19.0indirect
crates.ioequator0.4.2indirect
crates.ioequator-macro0.4.2indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.3indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.ioexr1.74.2indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iofax0.2.7indirect
crates.iofdeflate0.3.7indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.14indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iog2gen1.2.2indirect
crates.iog2p1.2.2indirect
crates.iog2poly1.2.2indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iogif0.14.2indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioimage-webp0.2.4indirect
crates.ioimgref1.12.3indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.2indirect
crates.iointerpolate_name0.2.4indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitertools0.14.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.35indirect
crates.iolebe0.5.3indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.190indirect
crates.iolibfuzzer-sys0.4.13indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.ioloop90.1.5indirect
crates.iolru0.18.5indirect
crates.iomaybe-rayon0.1.1indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.9.1indirect
crates.iomoxcms0.8.1indirect
crates.ionew_debug_unreachable1.0.6indirect
crates.iono_std_io20.9.4indirect
crates.ionom8.0.0indirect
crates.ionoop_proc_macro0.3.0indirect
crates.ionum0.4.3indirect
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.8indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-derive0.4.2indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.47indirect
crates.ionum-iter0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-rational0.4.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.iopaste1.0.15indirect
crates.iopastey0.1.1indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopng0.18.1indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.5.0indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioprofiling1.0.18indirect
crates.ioprofiling-procmacros1.0.18indirect
crates.ioproptest1.12.0indirect
crates.iopulp0.22.3indirect
crates.iopulp-wasm-simd-flag0.1.1indirect
crates.iopxfm0.1.30indirect
crates.ioqoi0.4.1indirect
crates.ioqrcode0.14.1indirect
crates.ioquick-error1.2.3indirect
crates.ioquick-error2.0.1indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.47indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.10.3indirect
crates.iorand0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.10.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.5.0indirect
crates.iorav1e0.8.1indirect
crates.ioravif0.13.0indirect
crates.ioraw-cpuid11.6.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioreborrow0.5.5indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorgb0.8.53indirect
crates.iorqrr0.11.0indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.5indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.iorusty-fork0.3.1indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.10indirect
crates.iosimd_helpers0.1.0indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.16.3indirect
crates.iostable_deref_trait1.2.1indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.6indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.9indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.21indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.21indirect
crates.iotiff0.11.3indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.25.17+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.5+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.26indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.27indirect
crates.iov_frame0.3.9indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.129indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.129indirect
crates.ioweezl0.1.12indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.4indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.ioy4m0.8.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.63indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.63indirect
crates.iozlib-rs0.6.7indirect
crates.iozlib-rs0.6.8indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
crates.iozune-core0.5.1indirect
crates.iozune-core0.5.3indirect
crates.iozune-inflate0.2.54indirect
crates.iozune-jpeg0.5.15indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 210 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
paste1.0.15indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.