Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 06:13 UTC

hovek / Syrilium.Caching

Easy and seamless caching implementation of any virtual method in any class.

C# · HTMLNo license detected★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Feb 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

hovek/Syrilium.Caching holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (50/100) and lowest on Vitality (1/100). It was last updated 657 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 27 is calibrated to 21 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

hovekPersonal account
0 followers5 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetSyrilium.Caching5.5.4-470 days agocachecachingeasytimemethodresultoutputparametersthreadsafegeneric

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

1Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 657 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push657
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate
How it's scored
49/80Total downloads — 51,421 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesSyrilium.Caching
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads51,421
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

74Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

35Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of hovek
17.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginhovek
public_repos5
account_age_days4,654
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 47 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesSyrilium.Caching
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

27At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

1Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/877717/Syrilium-Caching
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://www.codeproject.com/Tips/877717/Syrilium-Caching
docs_sitehttp://www.codeproject.com/Tips/877717/Syrilium-Caching
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

29At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

11Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 15 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate1.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories16
affected_packages8
assessed_packages30
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 30 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

30At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — 0 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

26At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Syrilium.Caching/Syrilium.Caching.csproj, Syrilium.CachingInterface/Syrilium.CachingInterface.csproj, Syrilium.Common/Syrilium.Common.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 61
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsSyrilium.Caching/Syrilium.Caching.csproj, Syrilium.CachingInterface/Syrilium.CachingInterface.csproj, Syrilium.Common/Syrilium.Common.csproj, Syrilium.CommonInterface/Syrilium.CommonInterface.csproj, TestMVC/TestMVC.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 3/68 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes273,990
source_files_sampled68
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
657days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.1 / 10
1.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 06:13 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities15 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 30

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAntlr3.4.1.9004indirect
NuGetbootstrap3.0.0indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.1.1indirect
NuGetEntityFramework6.2.0indirect
NuGetjQuery1.10.2indirect
NuGetjQuery.Validation1.11.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Identity.Core2.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Identity.EntityFramework2.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Identity.Owin2.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc5.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages3.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.jQuery.Unobtrusive.Validation3.2.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Host.SystemWeb3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.Cookies3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.Facebook3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.Google3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.MicrosoftAccount3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.OAuth3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Security.Twitter3.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetModernizr2.6.2indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json6.0.4indirect
NuGetNuGet.CommandLine4.5.1indirect
NuGetOwin1.0indirect
NuGetRespond1.2.0indirect
NuGetWebGrease1.5.2indirect
Dependency advisories 8

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 30 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 8 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
jQuery.Validation1.11.1indirecthigh11.19.3
Microsoft.AspNet.Identity.Owin2.1.0indirecthigh17.0.9
Microsoft.Owin3.0.0indirecthigh26.0.5
Microsoft.Owin.Security.Cookies3.0.0indirecthigh16.0.5
Newtonsoft.Json6.0.4indirecthigh113.0.1
bootstrap3.0.0indirectmoderate65.3.0
jQuery1.10.2indirectmoderate34.4.0
NuGet.CommandLine4.5.1indirectmoderate16.2.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with hovek/Syrilium.Caching. Read them side by side →

81Catel/CatelAn application development platformExcellent78soenneker/soenneker.maf.cacheProviding async thread-safe singleton Microsoft Agent Framework Agents instances.Good77aws/aws-secretsmanager-caching-netThe AWS Secrets Manager .NET caching client enables in-process caching of secrets for .NET applications.Good97wasmerio/wasmer🚀 Fast, secure, lightweight containers based on WebAssemblyExceptional94open-mercato/open-mercatoThe AI-Engineering Foundation Framework for CRM/ERP and commerce: open-source TypeScript, with multi-tenancy, RBAC, events and domain modules already decided as conventions and specs, so Cursor, Claude Code and Codex build features instead of re-deciding architecture. Start with 80% done.Exceptional94wp-media/wp-rocketPerformance optimization plugin for WordPressExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.