Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 16:37 UTC

hydephp / hyde

HydePHP - Static Site Generator with the power of Laravel and the simplicity of Markdown.

PHP · BladeMIT★ 486 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Mar 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

#hyde #php #blog-engine #static-site-generator #hydephp #laravel #tailwind #tailwindcss #documentation-generator

hydephp/hyde holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (61/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HydePHPOrganization · verified domain

47 followers45 public repossince Mar 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	hyde/hyde	v2.0.1	207	112	61 days ago	framework static-site-generator hyde ssg hyde-framework hydephp static-site-framework

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
6.2/36	Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
15.3/18	Commit volume — 49 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	49
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	9

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 61 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~90.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v2.0.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	61
mean_days_between_releases	90.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

58Moderate

How it's scored

43.6/60	Stars — 486 stars
10.5/25	Forks — 19 forks
4.3/15	Watchers — 7 watchers

Inputs used

forks	19
stars	486
watchers	7
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

31At Risk

How it's scored

30.9/80	Monthly downloads — 207 downloads/month across packagist
0/20	Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	hyde/hyde
dependents	0
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	4,144
monthly_downloads	207
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.893

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good

How it's scored

39.2/42	Issue resolution — 93% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 202/223 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	202
open_issues	6
closed_issues	84
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.933
closed_unmerged_prs	21
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

83Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
12.1/25	Owner reach — 47 followers of hydephp
21.1/25	Track record — 45 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	47
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	hydephp
public_repos	45
account_age_days	1,636

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 61 days ago
20/20	Version history — 112 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	hyde/hyde
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	61

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://hydephp.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 9 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	hyde, php, blog-engine, static-site-generator, hydephp, laravel, tailwind, tailwindcss, documentation-generator
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://hydephp.com
docs_site	https://hydephp.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

61Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	6.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	124
unassessed_packages	4
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 124 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://hydephp.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 82 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://hydephp.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.845
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	242

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/15 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	18,299
source_files_sampled	15
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

486GitHub stars

4contributors

49commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

6open issues

npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿

0Stars

19Forks

28Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 2Minor 8Patch 5

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10

6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 16:37 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	25 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 2

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	hyde/framework	`^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	laravel-zero/framework	`^11.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 128

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	hyde/framework	`—`	direct
Packagist	laravel-zero/framework	`—`	direct
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/node	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/typography	`0.5.20`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/vite	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.2`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	autoprefixer	`10.5.4`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.17`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.8`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001809`	indirect
npm	cssesc	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.412`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.5`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fraction.js	`5.3.4`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	hyde-vite-plugin	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hydefront	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.53`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	postcss-selector-parser	`6.0.10`	indirect
npm	postcss-value-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	tailwindcss	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.15`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`7.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	hyde/realtime-compiler	`—`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 124 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records