Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 19:24 UTC

hylla-io / lagom

lagom — Go sibling in the hylla workspace

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

hylla-io/lagom holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Hylla, Inc.Organization · verified domain
0 followers8 public repossince Apr 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/hylla-io/lagom/gov0.1.2-310 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
15.7/18Commit volume55 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year55
human_commit_share0.667
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases4 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~21.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagv0.1.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases21.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
17.4/30PR acceptance25/43 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance3/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs25
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach0 followers of hylla-io
7.7/25Track record8 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginhylla-io
public_repos8
account_age_days144
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 10 days ago
12/20Version history3 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/hylla-io/lagom/go
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages235
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 235 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history44 of 44 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,590
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapjustfile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 66
8/8Automated maintenance22 of the last 66 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/lagom-audit/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-config/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-core/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-node/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-proxy/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-py/Cargo.toml, crates/lagom-wasm/Cargo.toml, go/examples/go.mod, go/go.mod, go/parity/go.mod, parity/runners/compare/Cargo.toml, parity/runners/rust/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.333
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes2/58 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes85,540
source_files_sampled58
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
55commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 19:24 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests16 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/tetratelabs/wazerov1.12.0go/go.mod
All dependencies 239

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 238 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/tetratelabs/wazerov1.12.0direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioassert_cmdindirect
crates.ioassert_cmd2.2.2indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobstr1.12.3indirect
crates.iobytes1.11.1indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.12.0indirect
crates.ioctor1.0.7indirect
crates.iodifflib0.4.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofloat-cmp0.10.0indirect
crates.iofutures0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibloading0.9.0indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iomio1.2.1indirect
crates.ionapi3.12.6indirect
crates.ionapi-build2.4.3indirect
crates.ionapi-derive3.6.7indirect
crates.ionapi-derive-backend6.1.3indirect
crates.ionapi-sys3.3.1indirect
crates.ionohash-hasher0.2.0indirect
crates.ionormalize-line-endings0.3.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.iopredicatesindirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.4indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.10indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.13indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.iopyo30.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.29.0indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.29.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.0indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.2indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.8indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.4indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotempfileindirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermtree0.5.1indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotokio1.52.3indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.3indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mark3labs/mcp-gov1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/yosida95/uritemplate/v3v3.0.2indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.42.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.11.0indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.9.2indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.11.0indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.9.2indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.1indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.2.2indirect
npm@inquirer/ansi2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/checkbox5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/confirm6.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/core11.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/editor5.2.2indirect
npm@inquirer/expand5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/external-editor3.0.3indirect
npm@inquirer/figures2.0.7indirect
npm@inquirer/input5.1.2indirect
npm@inquirer/number4.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/password5.1.1indirect
npm@inquirer/prompts8.5.2indirect
npm@inquirer/rawlist5.3.1indirect
npm@inquirer/search4.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/select5.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/type4.0.7indirect
npm@napi-rs/cli3.10.3indirect
npm@napi-rs/cross-toolchain1.0.3indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm-eabi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-freebsd-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-ppc64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-riscv64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-s390x-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-wasm32-wasi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-arm64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-ia32-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-x64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm-eabi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-freebsd-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-wasm32-wasi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-ia32-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-x64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.2.4indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm-eabi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-freebsd-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-wasm32-wasi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-ia32-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-x64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.10indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.4indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmchardet2.1.1indirect
npmcli-width4.1.0indirect
npmclipanion4.0.0-rc.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmes-toolkit1.47.1indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmjs-yaml5.4.2indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmute-stream3.0.0indirect
npmobug3.0.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.4indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypanion3.14.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
PyPImaturinindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 235 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.