Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 02:15 UTC

hyperpolymath / januskey

Rust CLI for reversible file operations. Every delete, modify, and move carries inversion metadata, enabling instant rollback without external backups. Uses content-addressed storage (SHA-256) and an append-only operation log. Formal proofs of the complete reversibility guarantee are pending.

RustMPL-2.0★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

hyperpolymath/januskey holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (88/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jonathan D.A. JewellPersonal account
312 followers352 public repossince Feb 2014The Open University & National Union of Journalists

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
27.7/36Commit cadence — 40/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 311 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year311
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year40
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 282 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv1.0.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release282
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

46Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

45Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.968
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 128/138 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs128
open_issues9
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d25
prs_decided_30d25
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
17.9/25Owner reach — 312 followers of hyperpolymath
25/25Track record — 352 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers312
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginhyperpolymath
public_repos352
account_age_days4,622
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 19 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfile-operations, rust, maximum-principal-reduction, cli-tool, content-addressed-storage, epistemic-computing, epistemic-infrastructure, equivalence-aware-computing, hyperpolymath, open-source, security, typed-provenance, veridical-computing, zero-trust, instant-rollback, reversible-file-operations, secure-deletion, transaction
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages216
unassessed_packages29
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 216 resolved dependencies against OSV. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .claude/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 74 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.841
agent_instruction_files.claude/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,410
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — .machine_readable/contractiles/Justfile, .mise.toml, Justfile, mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 41 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files.machine_readable/contractiles/Justfile, .mise.toml, Justfile, mise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.41
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/dashboard-check/Cargo.toml, crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml, crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/27 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes30,482
source_files_sampled27
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
2contributors
311commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
9open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'januskey' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'dashboard-check' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'reversible-core' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 02:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 5/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
7SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 7
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iotoml0.8crates/dashboard-check/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreversible-core—crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iohmac0.12crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs5crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iocolored2crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iodialoguer0.11crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.18crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhoami1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaes-gcm0.10crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioargon20.5crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.9crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iosubtle2crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22crates/januskey-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha20.10crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iouuid1crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohex0.4crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflate21crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iowhoami1crates/reversible-core/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 245

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 50 direct and 195 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaes-gcm—direct
crates.ioaes-gcm0.10.3direct
crates.ioanyhow—direct
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103direct
crates.ioargon2—direct
crates.ioargon20.5.3direct
crates.iobase64—direct
crates.iobase640.22.1direct
crates.iochrono—direct
crates.iochrono0.4.45direct
crates.ioclap—direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.iocolored—direct
crates.iocolored2.2.0direct
crates.iodialoguer—direct
crates.iodialoguer0.11.0direct
crates.iodirs—direct
crates.iodirs5.0.1direct
crates.ioflate2—direct
crates.ioflate21.1.9direct
crates.ioglob—direct
crates.ioglob0.3.3direct
crates.iohex—direct
crates.iohex0.4.3direct
crates.iohmac—direct
crates.iohmac0.12.1direct
crates.ioindicatif—direct
crates.ioindicatif0.18.6direct
crates.iorand—direct
crates.iorand0.9.4direct
crates.ioserde—direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.ioserde_json—direct
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150direct
crates.iosha2—direct
crates.iosha20.10.9direct
crates.iosubtle—direct
crates.iosubtle2.6.1direct
crates.iothiserror—direct
crates.iothiserror1.0.69direct
crates.iotoml—direct
crates.iotoml0.8.23direct
crates.iouuid—direct
crates.iouuid1.23.3direct
crates.iowalkdir—direct
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0direct
crates.iowhoami—direct
crates.iowhoami1.6.1direct
crates.iozeroize—direct
crates.iozeroize1.9.0direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaead0.5.2indirect
crates.ioaes0.8.4indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioassert_cmd—indirect
crates.ioassert_cmd2.2.2indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase64ct1.8.3indirect
crates.iobit-set0.8.0indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.8.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.ioblake20.10.6indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobstr1.12.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.2.64indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.iocipher0.4.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.ioconsole0.15.11indirect
crates.ioconsole0.16.4indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.iocriterion0.5.1indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.6indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.21indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.ioctr0.9.2indirect
crates.iodifflib0.4.0indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodirs-sys0.4.1indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode1.0.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofloat-cmp0.10.0indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioghash0.5.1indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.65indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.ioinout0.1.4indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.17indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitertools0.10.5indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.102indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibredox0.1.17indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.32indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionormalize-line-endings0.3.0indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.ioopaque-debug0.3.1indirect
crates.iooption-ext0.2.0indirect
crates.iopassword-hash0.5.0indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioplain0.2.3indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.iopolyval0.6.2indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.iopredicates—indirect
crates.iopredicates3.1.4indirect
crates.iopredicates-core1.0.10indirect
crates.iopredicates-tree1.0.13indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioproptest—indirect
crates.ioproptest1.11.0indirect
crates.ioquick-error1.2.3indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_xorshift0.4.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.8.1indirect
crates.ioredox_users0.4.6indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.14indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.22indirect
crates.iorusty-fork0.3.1indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.9indirect
crates.ioshell-words1.1.1indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.9indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotempfile—indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermtree0.5.1indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.11indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.22.27indirect
crates.iotoml_write0.1.2indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounarray0.1.4indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iounit-prefix0.5.2indirect
crates.iouniversal-hash0.5.1indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowait-timeout0.2.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasite0.1.0indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.125indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.125indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.102indirect
crates.ioweb-time1.1.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.62.2indirect
crates.iowindows-implement0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-interface0.59.3indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-result0.4.1indirect
crates.iowindows-strings0.5.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.15indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.52indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.52indirect
crates.iozeroize_derive1.5.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 216 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.